Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Revocation of Letters of Administration: Multiple sources confirm that Letters of Administration can be revoked if the court finds grounds such as the existence of a valid will or procedural irregularities. For example, in ["
ROSALIN THAVARANY A/P KULASINGAM & ANOR. vs KULASINGAM S/O SAMUEL - High Court
"], [](https://supremetoday.ai/doc/judgement/MYS_MARSDENLR_1997_1913), [](https://supremetoday.ai/doc/judgement/MY_MLRH_1997_6_MLRH_285), and ["ROSALIN THAVARANY A/P KULASINGAM vs KULASINGAM S/O SAMUEL
"], courts have held that when a will is acknowledged and the grant was based on a will or incorrect procedures, the Letters of Administration are subject to revocation. Specifically, The grant of the Letters of Administration is revoked [](https://supremetoday.ai/doc/judgement/MYS_MARSDENLR_1997_1913), ["ROSALIN THAVARANY A/P KULASINGAM vs KULASINGAM S/O SAMUEL
"].Main Points and Insights:
ROSALIN THAVARANY A/P KULASINGAM & ANOR. vs KULASINGAM S/O SAMUEL - High Court
"].Courts have emphasized that revocation can occur when the grant was improperly issued or based on procedural flaws, and the revocation restores the estate to its rightful legal standing [](https://supremetoday.ai/doc/judgement/MY_MLRH_1997_6_MLRH_285).
Analysis and Conclusion:
ROSALIN THAVARANY A/P KULASINGAM & ANOR. vs KULASINGAM S/O SAMUEL - High Court
"], [](https://supremetoday.ai/doc/judgement/MYS_MARSDENLR_1997_1913), [](https://supremetoday.ai/doc/judgement/MY_MLRH_1997_6_MLRH_285), ["ROSALIN THAVARANY A/P KULASINGAM vs KULASINGAM S/O SAMUEL
"].
In the realm of property transfers, few acts carry as much emotional and legal weight as gifting property through a , often referred to as '' in traditional terms. But what happens when the donor has second thoughts? A common question arises: can be revoked? This query touches on fundamental principles of Indian property law, balancing the donor's intent with the donee's rights.
This article delves into the legal framework governing gift deeds, drawing from statutory provisions and judicial precedents. While gifts symbolize generosity, their underscores the seriousness of such transfers. Note that this is general information and not specific legal advice—consult a qualified lawyer for your situation.
A is a legal instrument under the (TPA) that transfers voluntarily . Once executed, registered, and accepted, it binds both parties. The key question—can be revoked—hinges on whether the deed is absolute or conditional.
Main Legal Finding: A , once validly executed and not expressly made revocable, cannot be revoked arbitrarily or at the will of the donor, unless specific conditions or clauses permitting revocation are present. Based on legal principles, a gift that is absolute and free from reservation of rights of revocation generally remains irrevocable. 2011 0 Supreme(SC) 1118
explicitly states: a gift which the parties agree shall be revocable wholly or in part, at the mere will of the donor, is void wholly or in part, as the case may be. 2011 0 Supreme(SC) 1118 In the absence of such an agreement, the gift is generally irrevocable. 2011 0 Supreme(SC) 1118
Revocation is not impossible but strictly limited. Here are the primary scenarios:
Absence of a revocation clause renders the gift irrevocable. 2024 7 Supreme 759 2016 0 Supreme(SC) 1729
Courts have consistently upheld these principles:
These cases reinforce that an , with no reservation of rights, cannot be revoked unilaterally.2011 0 Supreme(SC) 1118 2024 7 Supreme 759
Mere non-utilization or lack of development of the gifted property does not justify revocation. 2016 0 Supreme(SC) 1729
While gift deeds follow specific rules, revocation principles appear across Indian and related jurisprudence, offering comparative insights:
This highlights how statutory mechanisms can imply revocation, unlike voluntary gifts.
These examples illustrate that revocation typically requires explicit provision, procedure, or cause—aligning with rules.
Even with clauses, revocable gifts are void if at the donor's mere will. 2011 0 Supreme(SC) 1118 Failed contingencies or unproven vitiating factors (e.g., ) do not suffice. Any attempt to revoke without basis is invalid. 2016 0 Supreme(SC) 1729
In conclusion: A gift (or ) cannot be revoked unless the deed explicitly provides for it or specific legal grounds are proven. Absent such, it remains irrevocable. 2011 0 Supreme(SC) 1118 2024 7 Supreme 759 2016 0 Supreme(SC) 1729
Key Takeaways:- Gifts are irrevocable by default under TPA Section 126.- Explicit clauses or court-proven vitiation are essential for revocation.- Case law prioritizes donee's security post-acceptance.- Broader laws reinforce procedural rigor for revocations.
Understanding these nuances protects your interests. For personalized guidance, engage a legal expert.
References:1. 2011 0 Supreme(SC) 1118: TPA Section 126 and related principles.2. 2024 7 Supreme 759: Judgment on absence of revocation clause.3. 2016 0 Supreme(SC) 1729: Clarification on irrevocable gifts.
#GiftDeedRevocation, #PropertyLawIndia, #DanRevocable
(i) Menurut pengakuan nyata Defendan di dalam pembelaan dan Tuntutan-Balas Terpinda Defendan bahawa Defendan sedar tentang Wasiat bertarikh 20 haribulan Jun 1972 pada semua masa material, Defendan tiada locus dan asas untuk memohon dan diberikan Surat Kuasa Mentadbir dalam Mahkamah Tinggi Kuala ... S3-31-413-95 dan "ex-facie" dan tuntutan Plentif-Plentif untuk pembatalan Surat Kuasa Mentadbir yang tersebut di atas di dalam Pernyataan Tuntutan Terpinda Semula haruslah dibenarkan dan Pe....
(i) Menurut pengakuan nyata Defendan di dalam pembelaan dan Tuntutan-Balas Terpinda Defendan bahawa Defendan sedar tentang Wasiat bertarikh 20 haribulan Jun 1972 pada semua masa material, Defendan tiada locus dan asas untuk memohon dan diberikan Surat Kuasa Mentadbir dalam Mahkamah ... S3-31-413-95 dan "ex-facie" dan tuntutan Plentif-Plentif untuk pembatalan Surat Kuasa Mentadbir yang tersebut di atas di dalam Pernyataan Tuntutan Terpinda Semula haruslah dibenarkan dan Penghakiman dim....
(i) Menurut pengakuan nyata Defendan di dalam pembelaan dan Tuntutan-Balas Terpinda Defendan bahawa Defendan sedar tentang Wasiat bertarikh 20 haribulan Jun 1972 pada semua masa material, Defendan tiada locus dan asas untuk memohon dan diberikan Surat Kuasa Mentadbir dalam Mahkamah ... S3-31-413-95 dan "ex-facie" dan tuntutan Plentif-Plentif untuk pembatalan Surat Kuasa Mentadbir yang tersebut di atas di dalam Pernyataan Tuntutan Terpinda Semula haruslah dibenarkan dan Penghakiman dim....
(i) Menurut pengakuan nyata Defendan di dalam pembelaan dan Tuntutan-Balas Terpinda Defendan bahawa Defendan sedar tentang Wasiat bertarikh 20 haribulan Jun 1972 pada semua masa material, Defendan tiada locus dan asas untuk memohon dan diberikan Surat Kuasa Mentadbir dalam Mahkamah Tinggi Kuala ... S3-31-413-95 dan "ex-facie" dan tuntutan Plentif-Plentif untuk pembatalan Surat Kuasa Mentadbir yang tersebut di atas di dalam Pernyataan Tuntutan Terpinda Semula haruslah dibenarkan dan Pe....
Kedua menjadi sah dan menggantikan pencalonan yang dibuat memihak kepada saya iaitu pada 9 Mac 2003, satu deklarasi bahawa Defendan Pertama dan Kedua memegang wang si mati sebagai amanah untuk kanak-kanak yang menjadi sebahagian daripada harta pusaka mendiang Paribalan; 3) dan sekiranya mahkamah ... In considering this issue, the Court has to determine whether the 1st nomination has been revoked or cancelled by the Deceased, and has been superseded by the 2nd nomination. ... 7) Perintah lain atau selanjutnya dianggap se....
bagi kerugian kepada Pemohon yang disebabkan oleh keputusan serta tindakan Menteri bagi Kementerian Tenaga, Teknologi Hijau dan Air, Malaysia dan/atau Suruhanjaya Tenaga tersebut di atas.". ... Kekompetenan Pemohon; 4) Satu perintah certiorari untuk membatalkan tindakan dan/atau keputusan Suruhanjaya Tenaga atas pembatalan secara mutlak Sijil Perakuan kekompetenan Pemohon melalui satu surat bertarikh 11 March 2013; dan 5) Gantirugi khas dan gantirugi am oleh Kerajaan Malaysia ... [2] Following the abov....
On 12 March 2008 the Deputy Minister revoked the detention order dated 6 November 2007. When the Deputy Minister signed the Cancellation Order dated 12 March 2008, the detention order dated 6 November 2007 is with immediate effect revoked. ... Hence the issue of "Penahanan Salah dan Pencabulan Kebebasan Dan Hak Asasi plaintif yang dijamin oleh perlembagaan sebagai seorang Warganegara Malaysia" does not arise. ... [38] Both the orders have been effectively revoked. There is no question of both the order....
On 12 March 2008 the Deputy Minister revoked the detention order dated 6 November 2007. When the Deputy Minister signed the Cancellation Order dated 12 March 2008, the detention order dated 6 November 2007 is with immediate effect revoked. ... Hence the issue of "Penahanan Salah dan Pencabulan Kebebasan Dan Hak Asasi plaintif yang dijamin oleh perlembagaan sebagai seorang Warganegara Malaysia" does not arise. ... 28 March 2011 adalah perintah yang sah dan berkuatkuasa pada masa ianya dikeluarkan". ... k....
Kerjasama dan pertihbangan segera pihak tuan di dalam perkara ini adalah sangat dihargai dan diharapkan. Sekian, terima kasih. ... On 2 April 1980, the Executive Council approved the appellants application for the qualified titles to the 1,462 lots but revoked its earlier approval for the undivided Lot No 72656. ... Galian informed the appellant that the original approval for alienation of land Lot 72656 had been revoked at the Executive Councils meeting on 13 July 1994 in accordance with the decisio....
72656 had been revoked at the Executive Councils meeting on 13 July 1994 in accordance with the decision which was made by the council on 2 July 1980. ... Kerjasama dan pertihbangan segera pihak tuan di dalam perkara ini adalah sangat dihargai dan diharapkan. Sekian, terima kasih. ... On 2 April 1980, the Executive Council approved the appellants application for the qualified titles to the 1,462 lots but revoked its earlier approval for the undivided Lot No 72656. ... Galian Perak Pejabat T....
Pardon, once granted, he contends, can neither be revoked, nor withdrawn or cancelled. Strictly speaking, this contention may be correct; however, certain judicial decisions have referred to revocation of pardon, once tendered under Section 306 of the Cr PC, following the issuance of certificate, by the Public Prosecutor under Section 308 (1). A preliminary objection had been advanced, by Mr. Handoo, that the Cr PC does not contemplate "revocation of pardon". Interestingly, Ratanlal and Dhirajlal, too, in their "The Code of Criminal Procedure" - which has, with the passage ....
5. A reading of Section 70 shows that a Will can be revoked in different methods. The second is by destroying the same such as by burning or tearing. One method is to declare by writing an intention to revoke the Will. 5. A reading of Section 70 shows that a Will can be revoked in different methods. The second is by destroying the same such as by burning or tearing. One method is to declare by writing an intention to revoke the Will.
It can also be revoked after he has proceeded on leave. The exigency necessitating the revocation of leave may arise after the officer has proceeded on leave. It can be exercised before the officer to whom leave was granted proceeds on leave. Revocation of leave simply means cancelling the leave granted.
The issue will assume a new dimension altogether if it was to be examined on the touchstone of the position that the power to appoint includes the power to recall also. None of these events like the Arbitrator s inability to perform or his withdrawal from office exists in the present case. Could his authority be revoked still is the question. Similarly it could also be argued that the appointing authority had become functus officio after the appointment of Respondent No.
In his submission, M/s. Jagruti Textile has not yet got their industrial unit de-registered from the central excise department as such it is not possible under Notification No. 35/2001CE(NT), dated 26-6-2002 to issue another registration certificate in the name of the petitioner for carrying out processing of fabrics in the very same industrial premises. 6. Shri Jetly submits that once registration is given it is permanent. It can be revoked only by proper authority or the registrant may get himself de-registered with the Central Excise authority following procedure laid down under....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
