Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
Allegation of Cheating and Criminal Intent - The case discusses whether the accused had dishonest intention under Section 420 IPC. It was argued that the contract between the accused and PW-2 involved the latter paying expenses for Gulf employment, indicating no criminal intent. Evidence showed that payments were made for employment arrangements, and the accused's role was limited to facilitating passports and visas, not cheating ["2023 0 Supreme(AP) 170"].
Section 138 NI Act Proceedings - The prosecution proved the issuance and service of statutory notices via postal records, establishing a debt owed by the accused, which was dishonored by cheque. The court found the offence under Section 138 of the NI Act made out, and the accused was held guilty due to non-repayment ["K MOHAMMED ALI vs P D SUNNY - Kerala"], ["2004 0 Supreme(Ker) 118"].
Absence of Dowry and Harassment Claims - The evidence indicated no demand for dowry or harassment under Section 304 B. The victim's complaints about harassment existed both before and after the husband's Gulf trip, but the court noted that mere visits or brief stay do not constitute cruelty or dowry harassment ["2004 0 Supreme(Ker) 118"].
Section 498A and Related Offences - The courts observed that there was no sufficient evidence to establish cruelty or mental harassment under Section 498A IPC. The accused's absence in Gulf and the absence of evidence of cruelty led to the conclusion that no offence under Section 498A was made out ["K MOHAMMED ALI vs P D SUNNY - Kerala"], ["K MOHAMMED ALI vs P D SUNNY - Kerala"].
Offence of Dishonest Conveyance (Section 420 IPC) - The case clarified that without evidence of dishonest intention from the outset, the offence under Section 420 IPC cannot be established. The accused's receipt of money for Gulf shows no proof of cheating or fraudulent intent ["2021 Supreme(Online)(KER) 4475"].
Physical Assault with Shoes - Allegations of intentionally kicking the victim with shoes, causing pain and swelling, were supported by her statements. The prosecution characterized this as deliberate cruelty, which could attract offences related to assault or cruelty ["2025 Supreme(Online)(KER) 6361"], ["2025 0 Supreme(Ker) 147"].
Criminal Conspiracy and Shoe Seizure - The prosecution's claim of conspiracy and illegal seizure of shoes lacked proper evidence, and the court highlighted that no acknowledgment or record supported the seizure. The Supreme Court's ruling emphasized that the accused can discharge burden during trial, and in this case, acquittal was ordered due to insufficient proof ["2023 0 Supreme(Telangana) 589"].
Legal Proceedings and Notices - Several cases discussed the importance of proper service of notices under Section 138 NI Act. In some instances, notices were deemed valid due to postal records, while in others, the accused was found to be abroad or unserved, affecting the prosecution's case ["2024 Supreme(Online)(KER) 14526"], ["K MOHAMMED ALI vs P D SUNNY - Kerala"].
Offences Related to Gulf Employment and Fraud - Cases involving false representations for Gulf employment or contractual disputes showed no criminal offence unless dishonest intent was proven. Evidence indicated that agreements and payments were for legitimate purposes, and no cheating was established ["2006 0 Supreme(AP) 1007"], ["1978 0 Supreme(Bom) 238"].
Offences of Cruelty and Animal Rights - The change of shoes on a horse did not constitute cruelty or violation of animal protection laws, as normal shoe changes were not harmful. Fines and suspension were imposed for minor violations, but no serious cruelty was proved ["2025 Supreme(Online)(KER) 6621"].
Analysis and Conclusion:The provided cases collectively demonstrate that allegations of cheating, criminal breach of trust, cruelty, or harassment require clear evidence of dishonest intent, malicious conduct, or unlawful acts. Many cases were dismissed or resulted in acquittal due to lack of proof, especially regarding mental cruelty, dowry demand, or cheating. Notices under Section 138 NI Act are crucial and must be properly served; otherwise, prosecution may fail. Claims related to Gulf employment often hinge on contractual clarity and proof of fraudulent intent. The courts emphasize that mere allegations without substantive evidence cannot sustain criminal charges.
In today's fast-paced business world, cases under of the () are commonplace. Imagine issuing a cheque for a loan given to someone heading to the Gulf for a job, only for it to bounce due to insufficient funds. The accused relocates abroad, and you send a via (Acknowledgment Due). Does this attract liability under ? Questions like Shoes that Accused in Gulf 138NIAct Attract highlight real concerns about notice service to NRIs or those in Gulf countries, cheque validity, and prosecution success.
This blog breaks down the legal framework, drawing from judicial precedents. Note: This is general information, not specific legal advice. Consult a lawyer for your case.
criminalizes due to insufficient funds or account closure. It provides a framework for prosecution, but success depends on strict compliance:- Issuance of a cheque for a .- Dishonour by the bank.- Service of a within 30 days of bank memo.- Failure to pay within 15 days of notice receipt.
The drawer (accused) faces up to 2 years imprisonment, fine up to twice the cheque amount, or both. Presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 favor the complainant unless rebutted. 2023 0 Supreme(Ker) 932
Proper notice service is pivotal, especially when the accused is in the Gulf. Courts presume if sent to the known address, even if undelivered or unacknowledged.
The accused must be served with a for the dishonored cheque. If the notice is sent to the known address of the accused, the of applies, even if the accused claims not to have received it. The court held that the accused cannot resist the of unless they provide evidence that they were deliberately kept out of service. 2020 0 Supreme(Ker) 189
In a Kerala High Court case, the prosecution proved notice under (b) via postal records, receipt, and acknowledgment card. The accused had borrowed Rs.40,000/- in for a Gulf job and promised repayment upon arrival. The court upheld conviction, affirming notice validity and liability. 2009 Supreme(Online)(KER) 39355
Another case emphasized: Giving of notice by complainant has come on record in form of documents including legal notice, registered post AD slip and track report of postal department confirming service of notice upon accused – cannot be rebutted unless contrary is proved by the accused.
Tip for Complainants: Always send via Registered AD Post to the last known address. Retain postal proof. Errors in address don't invalidate if no prejudice is shown. 2020 0 Supreme(Ker) 189
For Defendants in Gulf: Challenge service only with strong evidence of non-receipt or wrong address causing prejudice.
The cheque must discharge a or liability. presumes consideration, shifting the burden to the accused.
To attract liability under , the cheque must represent a . The complainant must prove that the cheque was issued in discharge of a debt or liability. The of consideration under of the applies unless rebutted by the accused. 2023 0 Supreme(Ker) 932 2023 0 Supreme(Ker) 809
However, won't qualify. In one instance, a loan's cheque was deemed unenforceable due to limitation, leading to acquittal. The court noted: If the case of the complainant may be believed to be true that he had lent the amount to the accused in the year , then the cheque issued in the year is barred by period of limitation and no longer remained for . 2019 0 Supreme(Guj) 1043
Direct evidence of transaction (loan agreements, witnesses) strengthens cases, especially with Gulf remittances involved.
Accused can rebut presumptions under Sections 118/139:1. Prove no consideration (e.g., blank cheque or gift). 2023 0 Supreme(Ker) 9002. Show cheque from closed account. 2023 0 Supreme(Ker) 9003. Contest execution/delivery without direct proof. 2020 0 Supreme(Ker) 965
The court emphasized the necessity of direct evidence proving the execution and delivery of the cheque. The absence of such evidence can lead to acquittal. 2020 0 Supreme(Ker) 965
Notice purpose: Give opportunity to pay. Denial of liability negates prejudice claims. 2020 0 Supreme(Ker) 189
For firms, directors/partners face liability if the company is prosecuted. 1989 0 Supreme(SC) 646 2011 0 Supreme(SC) 1010
Gulf connections recur: Accused borrowing for Gulf jobs, issuing cheques post-return, notices via post. Courts stress postal evidence. One case dismissed vague Gulf stay allegations insufficient for other offenses but underscored rigor. 2019 Supreme(Online)(KER) 68949
Irrelevant tangents like shoe trademarks (e.g., Adidas 'THREE STRIPES') or voice tests don't apply here, but highlight cheque cases' specificity. 2019 0 Supreme(Del) 607
Prosecution under for Gulf-based accused hinges on deemed notice service via , enforceable debt proof, and unrebutted presumptions. Cases like the Rs.40,000 Gulf loan affirm postal records' power. 2009 Supreme(Online)(KER) 39355
Outcomes vary by facts—strong evidence wins. Stay informed, act swiftly.
Key Takeaways:- to known address = . 2020 0 Supreme(Ker) 189- Prove debt; rebuttals need evidence. 2023 0 Supreme(Ker) 932- Gulf location no escape without proof.
References:2020 0 Supreme(Ker) 189 2020 0 Supreme(Ker) 965 2023 0 Supreme(Ker) 900 2023 0 Supreme(Ker) 932 1989 0 Supreme(SC) 646 2011 0 Supreme(SC) 1010 2009 Supreme(Online)(KER) 39355
2019 0 Supreme(Guj) 1043
This post is for informational purposes. Seek professional advice.
#Section138NIACT, #ChequeDishonour, #LegalNoticeGulf
Both the Courts below did not consider the defence of the accused that the contract between the petitioner (accused) and PW-2 is that PW-2 had to be sent to Gulf countries, for which PW-2 had to meet the expenditure and it was acted upon, as such, there was no criminal intention to attract Section 420 ... Similar is the evidence of PW-4, who testified that PW-2 told him that he is going to Gulf with the help of accused and about four years ago, he (PW-4), PW-2 and two others went to th....
According to prosecution, accused-revision petitioner borrowed a sum of Rs.40,000/- from the complainant in January, 1992 for the purpose of going to Gulf for job and he promised to return the amount on his reaching Gulf. ... It was also held that notice under Section 138(b) of the N.I Act was issued and this fact was proved by postal records, postal receipt and acknowledgment card. It was also found that the offence under Section 138 of the N.I Act is made out and the accused is guilt....
Therefore, there was no demand for dowry at all, to attract the ingredients of Section 304 B. The 1st accused had been in Gulf. The incident occurred a few days after he returned from Gulf. ... Merely because PW1 had gone to the house of accused persons, after 1st accused had arrived from Gulf, to say that he will give the land later, it cannot be said there was no harassment. ... The victim has been coming to the house of PW8, almost everyday, as spoken to by her, co....
The Court had observed that the complainant ought to have sent the statutory notice to the accused on his correct address in order to attract the offence under Section 138 of the NI Act. ... Whether the notice issued upon accused under Section 138(b) of the NI Act has been complied with ? II. Whether there was any legal debt outstanding in favour of the complainant in order to attract the offence under Section 138 of the NI Act against the accused ? ... Saiyed, learned advocate for the applicant has p....
There is no ingredient to attract the abovesaid ::3:: offences as alleged by the prosecution against any of the accused, especially against the petitioner. ... From Gulf, both husband and wife have lived together at the flat of the defacto complainant. ... countries where her husband is ::6:: employed and that families of both the couples were also in Gulf and that accused No.1 and the lady defacto complainant stayed ... Those types of vague allegations are not at all sufficient to attra....
The letter dated 5th August, 1968, addressed by the said Ministry of the Government of India to the said Gulf Oil shoes that a large amount of foreign exchange was released to the respondent for the import of the additives on behalf of the said Gulf Oil for blending finished lubricating oils for the ... Gulf Oil. ... said Gulf Oil. ... required for this would be supplied by the said Gulf Oil. ... On 23rd May, 1966, it entered into a contract with Gulf Oil (India) Pvt.....
The learned counsel further submits that the petitioner has to return to Gulf countries at the earliest in connection with his business. ... EXHIBITS:- EXHIBIT P1 COPY OF RELEVANT PAGES 1 AND 2 OF PASSPORT OF PETITIONER EXHIBIT P2 COPY OF NOTICE DATED 17/07/23 ISSUED BY RESPONDENT TO PETITIONER EXHIBIT P3 COPY OF REPLY DATED 03/08/23 ISSUED BY PETITIONER EXHIBIT P4 COPY OF POSTAL ... Since it is submitted that C.C.No.1238 of 16/08/23 EXHIBIT P7 COPY OF CHARGE SHEET IN CC 1238/2023 OF JFCM COURT, KOTHAMANGALAM EXHIBIT P8 COPY OF THE REMAINDER LETTER DATED 1....
Petitioner is the sole accused in the above case. The above committal proceedings was taken on file alleging offence punishable under Section 376(2)(n) IPC. 2. ... Thereafter, the defacto complainant went to Gulf. A close relative of the defacto complainant was there in Gulf and she and her relative was residing at separate places in Gulf. ... The same would CRL.MC NO. 6815 OF 2018 8 not attract the offence under Section 376 IPC. Therefore, I am of the considered opinion that the proceedings against the....
Thereafter, the defacto complainant went to Gulf. A close relative of the defacto complainant was there in Gulf and she and her relative was residing at separate places in Gulf. ... Petitioner is the sole accused in the above case. The above committal proceedings was taken on file alleging offence punishable under Section 376(2)(n) IPC. 2. ... The same would not attract the offence under Section 376 IPC. Therefore, I am of the considered opinion that the proceedings against the petitioner is an abuse o....
In the said case, the prosecution had alleged criminal conspiracy amongst two accused and in pursuance of conspiracy, amount was received. ... No reasons are assigned by the appellant as to why shoes were taken from P.W.1 and others and placed in the police station. At the time of taking shoes, there is no acknowledgment given by the appellant nor any record in the police station reflects that the shoes were taken from P.W.1 and others. ... It is further not in dispute that ten pairs of shoes from each ....
Therefore, the aforesaid complaint came to be lodged under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the respondent accused. In consequent whereof, the complainant issued notice through Registered AD Post as well as postal service which the accused refused to accept. Thereafter, on completion of that period, the complainant demanded the amount and in lieu thereof, the accused issued a cheque in favour of the complainant for Rs.8 Lacs which was deposited and came to be bounced with an endorsement “insufficient fund”.
It is defendant no.1, who used to supply alleged shoes and other footwears to the answering defendant and the defendant no.2, was receiving and selling those shoes under and upon bonafide belief that that was / were genuine shoes and there is no any violation of any law." 3. It is further submitted that the Plaintiffs have not come before this Hon'ble Court with clean hands and suppressed material facts herein, in fact the answering defendant itself is a victim of this falsehood perpetrated by Plaintiffs and other Defendants.
“The learned Additional Sessions Judge, however, in order to derive further assurance attempted, in the examination of the accused under Section 342. If the accused had refused to accede to this suggestion of the learned Additional Sessions Judge he would have been justified in doing so and there is no provision in law by which this demonstration could have been made.” 98. Thus, having viewed the matter from all possible angles, I find it extremely difficulty to take the view that by virtue of the provisions of the Act, 1920, Section 53 of the Cr.P.C. and Sections 73 and 165 of the Evidence ....
The police officers are put to hard work and they often spend sleepless nights under a load of stress and stain; but when they come to the court they should take care not to give the impression of sleepy policeman in the court of law. He must keep his hair well combed, his nails clean, his shoes shining. He must take particular care that his shoes do not creek so as to attract unwholesome attention. It is in the court of law that the police officer is expected to be alert.
This system eliminates the need for the advertiser to specify each of the myriad different search query combinations that are relevant to their ad.” So, the ad would show if the user entered any of the following search queries: “lennis shoes”, “red shoes” or “Nike shoes”. For example, if an advertiser has selected the keyword “shoes” that advertisers ad will appear when a user enters the word “shoes” as a search query, regardless of other search terms that may be used.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
