Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
The section aims to promote the credibility and wider use of cheques as a financial instrument, with proceedings primarily being compensatory but carrying criminal consequences ["Jayesh E. Shet vs The VPK Urban Co-op Credit Society Ltd. - Bombay"].
Role and Investigation by NIA - Main points and insights:
The NIA's jurisdiction extends to cases involving criminal acts, including those under the Negotiable Instruments Act, and its proceedings are subject to judicial review and judicial discretion ["Jayesh E. Shet vs The VPK Urban Co-op Credit Society Ltd. - Bombay"].
Legal Proceedings and Court Interpretations - Main points and insights:
Cases have demonstrated that if the accused or company responsible has paid or settled the liability, or if proceedings are initiated without proper grounds, courts may quash or acquit defendants ["Jayesh E. Shet vs The VPK Urban Co-op Credit Society Ltd. - Bombay"], ["VARUN vs AMIT KHANNA - Delhi"].
Summary and Conclusion:
References:- ["Anju VS Ram Gupta - Punjab and Haryana"]- ["Ankush Vipan Kapoor VS National Investigation Agency - Supreme Court"]- ["Ayaz Ahmad VS Union Territory of J&K - Crimes"]- ["Ayaz Ahmad VS Union Territory of J&K - Jammu and Kashmir"]- ["Jayesh E. Shet vs The VPK Urban Co-op Credit Society Ltd. - Bombay"]- ["Jayesh E. Shet vs The VPK Urban Co-op Credit Society Ltd. - Bombay"]- ["Jayesh E. Shet vs The VPK Urban Co-op Credit Society Ltd. - Bombay"]- ["Jayesh E. Shet vs The VPK Urban Co-op Credit Society Ltd. - Bombay"]- ["VARUN vs AMIT KHANNA - Delhi"]
In today's fast-paced business environment, cheques remain a common payment method. But what happens when a cheque bounces? Many people search for 'what is 138 NIA,' referring to Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (NIA). This provision criminalizes the dishonour of cheques issued for discharging debts or liabilities, aiming to ensure trust in financial transactions. KALAMANI TEX VS P. BALASUBRAMANIAN - 2021 1 Supreme 720
This blog post breaks down Section 138 NIA comprehensively, covering its scope, presumptions, procedures, exceptions, and insights from judicial cases. Note: This is general information and not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your situation.
Section 138 NIA establishes a criminal offense when a cheque, drawn for the discharge, in whole or in part, of any debt or other liability, is returned unpaid by the bank due to insufficient funds or exceeding arrangement. KALAMANI TEX VS P. BALASUBRAMANIAN - 2021 1 Supreme 720 The drawer (issuer) commits an offense if the payee presents the cheque within its validity period, receives a dishonour memo, and the drawer fails to pay after a statutory notice.
Key objectives include:- Facilitating quick recovery for payees.- Penalizing bad-faith cheque issuance. KALAMANI TEX VS P. BALASUBRAMANIAN - 2021 1 Supreme 720
The law applies broadly, including cheques issued as security or guarantees in loan agreements or hire purchases, provided they intend to discharge a liability. KALAMANI TEX VS P. BALASUBRAMANIAN - 2021 1 Supreme 720
For Section 138 to apply, several conditions must be met:- The cheque must be issued for a debt or liability (legally enforceable obligation). KALAMANI TEX VS P. BALASUBRAMANIAN - 2021 1 Supreme 720- Dishonour due to 'insufficient funds' or similar reasons (e.g., account closed, signature mismatch).- Payee serves a demand notice within 30 days of dishonour memo.- Drawer fails to pay within 15 days of notice receipt.
The offense completes upon lapse of this period, shifting focus to prosecution. KALAMANI TEX VS P. BALASUBRAMANIAN - 2021 1 Supreme 720
Sections 118 and 139 NIA create rebuttable presumptions:- Section 118: Every negotiable instrument is presumed made for consideration. KALAMANI TEX VS P. BALASUBRAMANIAN - 2021 1 Supreme 720- Section 139: The cheque was issued for discharging a debt or liability unless proven otherwise. KALAMANI TEX VS P. BALASUBRAMANIAN - 2021 1 Supreme 720
These shift the burden to the drawer to disprove with evidence, easing prosecution. Courts emphasize this facilitates expeditious resolution. KALAMANI TEX VS P. BALASUBRAMANIAN - 2021 1 Supreme 720
Penalty: Up to 2 years imprisonment, fine up to twice the cheque amount, or both. Courts often impose fines, allowing compounding (settlement). STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH through inspector general, national investigation agency VS MOHD. HUSSAIN alias saleem - 2013 0 Supreme(SC) 859
Indian courts have clarified Section 138 through numerous rulings, integrating nuances from real-world scenarios.
In one case, permission to compound the offence under Section 138 NIA was granted after settlement. NILESH PALYEKAR, PRESENTLY IN COLVALE JAIL, THR. NEHA PALYEKAR vs ANAND KANDOLKAR AND ANR The court noted: permission to compound the offence punishable under Section 138 of the NIA is granted. This highlights settlements as a common resolution.
Directors' liability under Section 141 requires specific averments linking them to the company's conduct. A complaint was quashed against a resigned director: the petitioner who resigned prior to issuance of the relevant cheque, and no averments were made to show her involvement. Dharna Goyal VS Aryan Infratech Pvt. Ltd. - 2020 Supreme(Del) 1515 The court held: Mere designation as a director or officer does not automatically entail liability. Dharna Goyal VS Aryan Infratech Pvt. Ltd. - 2020 Supreme(Del) 1515
Legal heirs cannot be prosecuted: A legal heir of drawer of cheque cannot be held criminally liable under Section 138 of NI Act. In a ruling, summoning a daughter was quashed since criminal liability is not transferred to the descendants or legal heirs. Neena Chopra VS Mahendra Singh Vaishya
Company prosecutions need the firm arrayed as accused: Prosecution against the individuals, without arraying the company as accused, is not maintainable. Vijay Kumar Bansal VS Shiv Kumar Grover - 2012 Supreme(P&H) 1142
Concurrent sentences in multiple cases were directed: Criminal Case No.391/NIA/138/2014/A and Criminal Case No.391/NIA/138/2016/C shall run concurrently. DEEPA DINESH MANDREAKR, PRESENTLY LODGED AT MODERN CENTRAL COLVALE JAIL, COLVALE vs BHATAGRAM URBAN CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD., REP. BY ITS C.E.O., SANJAY G. PARMEKAR AND ANR
These cases underscore strict compliance with procedural safeguards. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH through inspector general, national investigation agency VS MOHD. HUSSAIN alias saleem - 2013 0 Supreme(SC) 859
Not every bounced cheque triggers Section 138:- Cheques as mere security without intent to discharge liability may not qualify. KALAMANI TEX VS P. BALASUBRAMANIAN - 2021 1 Supreme 720- No consideration or illegal transactions (e.g., public policy violations). KALAMANI TEX VS P. BALASUBRAMANIAN - 2021 1 Supreme 720- Dishonour for reasons like 'stop payment' without valid defense may still apply if linked to debt evasion.- Time-barred complaints or improper notice. KALAMANI TEX VS P. BALASUBRAMANIAN - 2021 1 Supreme 720
Courts rebut presumptions with evidence, like proving no debt existed. KALAMANI TEX VS P. BALASUBRAMANIAN - 2021 1 Supreme 720
To avoid pitfalls:- Issuers: Ensure sufficient funds; document transactions clearly.- Payee: Send precise notices; preserve bank memos.- Disputes: Respond promptly to notices; seek compounding if possible.- Maintain records to rebut presumptions if needed. KALAMANI TEX VS P. BALASUBRAMANIAN - 2021 1 Supreme 720
In civil suits overlapping criminal cases, courts assess triable issues carefully, as in cheque-based recovery where leave to defend was denied due to defaults. TILAK SONDHI VS DEV CHANDRA JHA - 2019 Supreme(Del) 716
Section 138 NIA is a powerful tool for cheque dishonour enforcement, backed by presumptions and streamlined procedures. It promotes financial discipline but requires proof of liability and procedural adherence. From security cheques to director liabilities, courts interpret it pragmatically, often favoring settlements. KALAMANI TEX VS P. BALASUBRAMANIAN - 2021 1 Supreme 720STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH through inspector general, national investigation agency VS MOHD. HUSSAIN alias saleem - 2013 0 Supreme(SC) 859
Stay informed, document dealings, and act swiftly. For tailored advice, consult a legal expert. This framework helps navigate India's cheque bounce landscape effectively.
#Section138NIA, #ChequeBounce, #NIALaw
of Section 138 of NIA, 1881. ... under Section 138 of NIA only on existence of a legally enforceable debt or liability. ... A cumulative reading of Sections 79, 80, 82, 118, 138, and 139 of NIA makes it crystal clear that given the statutory mandate of Section 82 of NIA, before filing of the complaint in terms of Section 138 NIA, the moment the complainant receives the amount equal to the cheque amount, accepts it and admits ... The....
investigated by NIA. ... 14 of the NIA Act. ... over to the NIA to investigate a Scheduled Offence under Section 6 of the NIA Act. ... of powers under Section 6(5) read with Section 8 of the NIA Act, the NIA was directed to investigate the same. ... That having regard to Section 8 of NIA Act and in continuation of Order No.11011/44/2020/NIA dated 29.06.2020, it was ordered by the Central Government that the NIA may investigate FIR N....
There are certain special attributes to the NIA Act, which we must notice to conclude that the NIA Act is an enactment which inter alia aims at securing expeditious disposal of the cases investigated by the National Investigating Agency under the NIA Act. ... Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and gone through the scheme of the NIA Act, we deem it necessary to first set out Section 21 of the NIA Act, which reads thus:— “21. ... The appeal is preferred under Section 21 of the National Inves....
There are certain special attributes to the NIA Act, which we must notice to conclude that the NIA Act is an enactment which inter-alia aims at securing expeditious disposal of the cases investigated by the National Investigating Agency under the NIA Act. ... Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and gone through the scheme of the NIA Act, we deem it necessary to first set out Section 21 of the NIA Act, which reads thus: “21. ... The appeal is preferred under section 21 of the National Invest....
There are certain special attributes to the NIA Act, which we must notice to conclude that the NIA Act is an enactment which inter alia aims at securing expeditious disposal of the cases investigated by the National Investigating Agency under the NIA Act. ... Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and gone through the scheme of the NIA Act, we deem it necessary to first set out Section 21 of the NIA Act, which reads thus:- "21. Appeals. ... The appeal is preferred under section 21 of the Natio....
/138/2016/B is concerned. ... /138/2014/A and Criminal Case No.391/NIA/138/2016/C shall run concurrently and not consecutively. ... /138/2014/A and sentence in Criminal Case No.391/NIA/138/2016/C imposed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, ... /138/2016/B relates to the issue of gold Loan Account out that the conviction and sentence recorded in Criminal Case No.191/NIA
of the NIA. ... In view of the above, permission to compound the offence punishable under Section 138 of the NIA is granted. ... /179/2012/B for the offence punishable under petitioner is acquitted of the offence punishable under Section The Petitioner has been convicted by learned JMFC, Mapusa in Other Acts/NIA
MM to the extent of summoning the present respondents for the alleged offence under section 138 NIA. ... Thus, since no payment was made within the stipulated time, the petitioner instituted a complaint case under section 138 NIA against the said 11 cheques. However, the Ld. ... The petitioner thus seeks to restore the summoning order dated 28.01.2022 passed in CC No. 2352/2021 vide which the respondents along with others were summoned for the offence alleged under section 138 NIA. .......
of the NIA. ... of the NIA. ... of the NIA were compromised between the parties. ... of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (in acquitted the accused of the offence punishable under Section 138
of the NIA. ... of the NIA is granted subject to deposit of 15% of cheque amount in favour of Goa State Legal Services Authority, Panaji, have sought leave of the Court to compound the offence CRIR/16/2017 aside and is acquitted of the offence punishable under Section 138
It seems that the respondent was convicted for the offences under Section 138 of NIA. We may not be justified in adverting those aspects in this case as it may adversely affect the prosecution of the above case. The respondent also stated that she was forced to give a cheque to the creditors of the appellant. There is no dispute to the fact of raising imputation of adultery made by the appellant.
At this stage it is necessary to refer to Sections 138 and 141 of the NIA which are as follows:- "138. Dishonour of cheque for insufficiency, etc., of funds in the account.--Where any cheque drawn by a person on an account maintained by him with a banker for payment of any amount of money to another person from out of that account for the discharge, in whole or in part, of any debt or other liability, is returned by the bank unpaid, either because of the amount of money standing to the credit of that account is insufficient to honour the cheque or that it exceeds the amoun....
The cheques bearing No. 445362, 445364 and 445365 placed alongwith the suit plaint are only worth Rs.28,074/-, Rs.29000/- and Rs. 30,802/-/- totaling to Rs.87,876/. Us 138 NIA are also subject matter of present civil suit. Thus the cheques which were subject matter of proceedings 7. That the present suit has been filed on the basis of the account statement which is categorically denied by the defendant.
Sheetal Gaurav Jain and another which is pending in the court of Sh. Amit Thind, JMIC, Ludhiana and is fixed for 30.10.2009, which was filed due to misunderstanding and now the said misunderstanding has been removed with the intervention of the respectable persons from both the sides. 1. That the deponent has filed a complaint under Section 138 of NIA titled as Shiv Kumar Grover Vs. 2. The deponent will not pursue the complaint under Section 138 of the NIA mentioned above against Sheetal Gaurav Jain and Vijay Kumar Kaka RamBansal and will get the same withdrawn from the c....
Provided that nothing contained in this section shall apply unless: (a) the cheque has been presented to the bank within a period of six months from the date on which it is drawn or within the period of its validity, whichever is earlier. Section 138 of the NI Act is relevant and is extracted below: “138. Section 138 of the NI Act makes only signatory to the cheque returned unpaid criminally liable. Dishonour of cheque for insufficiency, etc. of funds in the account—Where any cheque drawn by a person on an account maintained by him with a banker for payment of any amount o....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
