Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
State of Uttar Pradesh vs Ramprakash Singh Citation:
Main Points and Insights:
Analysis and Conclusion:
References:- ["DIVISIONAL MANAGER GUJARAT STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION V/s RAMPRAKASH MATAFER - Gujarat"]- ["RAMPRAKASH MISHRA vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. PRIN. SECY. LUCKNOW - Allahabad"]- ["CHANDAR MOHAN GURJAR S/O BHANWAR LAL GURJAR Vs. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN - Rajasthan"]- ["RAMPRAKASH SINGH SIKARWAR (DEAD) THR LITS LEGAL HEIRS SMT. NIRMALA SIKARWAR vs SARDAR JAI SINGH JADHAV - Madhya Pradesh"]- ["Tajinderpal Singh vs Bhairam - Madhya Pradesh"]- ["Munna @ Umrao vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh - Madhya Pradesh"]- ["Bablu @ Bhura vs State Of M.P. - Madhya Pradesh"]
In the realm of Indian legal research, locating precise case citations can be crucial for lawyers, students, and researchers. A common query arises: What is the citation for State of UP vs Ramprakash Singh? This question often stems from references in criminal law discussions, appeals, or administrative matters involving Uttar Pradesh (UP). However, a thorough examination of available legal documents reveals no direct reference to this specific case. This blog post delves into the findings, explores related cases, and offers practical insights for effective legal research.
When investigating State of UP vs Ramprakash Singh, researchers typically turn to high court judgments, Supreme Court appeals, or databases of Allahabad High Court decisions. Unfortunately, core legal documents do not contain any explicit mention of this case. As noted in detailed reviews, The legal documents provided do not contain any direct reference or citation to a case titled State of UP vs Ramprakash Singh. Manjinder Singh VS State Of Punjab - 2019 0 Supreme(SC) 1980
Key observations include:- No document explicitly mentions Ramprakash Singh or the case title.- References cover criminal appeals, acquittals, evidence principles, and administrative law, but none align precisely. State of Uttar Pradesh VS Ishaq - 2024 0 Supreme(All) 1604Afjal Ansari VS State of Uttar Pradesh - 2024 0 Supreme(All) 1115
This absence implies the case may not be part of standard compilations or could require access to specialized archives. A thorough review of all the provided documents shows no mention of Ramprakash Singh or the specific case State of UP vs Ramprakash Singh. State of U. P. (Now Uttarakhand) VS Rabindra Singh - 2009 4 Supreme 768
Legal databases like Manupatra, SCC Online, or Indian Kanoon index millions of judgments, yet gaps exist due to:- Variant Naming: Cases might be listed under slightly different titles, such as applicant names or abbreviated forms.- Unreported Judgments: Older or lower court decisions may lack digital citations.- Scope Limitations: Analysis is confined to provided materials, which focus on appellate review, procedural fairness, and precedents. Mohd. Aslam @ Bhure VS State of U. P. - 1993 0 Supreme(SC) 1221Reshama W/o Mohmmad Ali @ Bablu VS State of Rajasthan - 2024 0 Supreme(Raj) 921
For instance, documents discuss principles of evidence and appellate interference without referencing this case. State of Uttar Pradesh VS Ishaq - 2024 0 Supreme(All) 1604 Principles like those in acquittal reviews are highlighted: general appellate standards apply but do not pertain here. Manjinder Singh VS State Of Punjab - 2019 0 Supreme(SC) 1980
While the exact case eludes direct citation, several related matters provide context, particularly in criminal and bail proceedings from Uttar Pradesh.
A notable reference is BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9511 of 2023, where Ramprakash Mishra is the applicant against State of U.P. Applicant :- Ramprakash Mishra Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Prin. Secy... Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC-LKO:49705. RAMPRAKASH MISHRA vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. PRIN. SECY. LUCKNOW The Lucknow Bench heard arguments, perused records, and issued an order on 28.7.2023. This bail matter underscores procedural norms in UP criminal cases, potentially akin to broader appeals. Pramit VS State of Uttar Pradesh - 2024 0 Supreme(All) 1019
These snippets illustrate Ramprakash in witness, applicant, or party roles across jurisdictions, often tied to criminal procedure or administrative recovery as arrears of land revenue.
UP-related documents emphasize enduring principles that might inform similar matters:
Courts exercise caution in interfering with acquittals. Contains general principles on appellate review and law of acquittals. Manjinder Singh VS State Of Punjab - 2019 0 Supreme(SC) 1980 No roving inquiry is mandated without clear defects. G. S. Agarwal: Sabajmala Jain VS State Of U. P. - 1983 0 Supreme(SC) 235
Where case is based on direct evidence it is not incumbent for the prosecution to allege or prove motive. Pahalwan Singh VS State of U. P. - 2020 Supreme(All) 82 Site maps and witness testimonies solidify place of occurrence, as in State of UP vs Lakhan Singh. Ram Charan VS State of U. P. - 2020 Supreme(All) 374Pahalwan Singh VS State of U. P. - 2020 Supreme(All) 82
Courts may recall orders under inherent powers: Apex Court in State of Gujarat Vs. Ramprakash P Puri, (1969) 3 SCC 156... Procedure has been described to be a handmaid and not a mistress of law. Virendra Kumar Anand @ V. K. Anand VS State of U. P.
Fraud on court allows recall: Respondent who signed Vakalathnama... Court found as a fact that respondent's signature was forged. A. Yameen Qureshi VS S. Rajeshwari - 2019 Supreme(Telangana) 171
These align with procedural fairness in UP matters. U. P. Co Operative Federation LTD. VS State Of U. P. - 1973 0 Supreme(SC) 21BRIJ KISHORE VERMA VS STATE OF U. P. - 2012 0 Supreme(All) 2523
To locate elusive citations:1. Use Multiple Databases: Cross-check Indian Kanoon, SCC Online, and High Court portals.2. Refine Searches: Try variants like Ram Prakash Singh or neutral citations.3. Consult Original Records: Approach Allahabad High Court registry for unreported cases.4. Leverage Precedents: Related cases like bail apps offer analogous principles. RAMPRAKASH MISHRA vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. PRIN. SECY. LUCKNOW
Disclaimer: This post provides general information based on available sources and is not legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for case-specific guidance.
The query State of UP vs Ramprakash Singh citation yields no direct hit in examined documents, highlighting research challenges. There is no reference or citation to State of UP vs Ramprakash Singh within the provided documents. Prakash Jha Productions VS Union of India - 2011 6 Supreme 109 Yet, related proceedings like Ramprakash Mishra's bail application and procedural precedents enrich understanding. RAMPRAKASH MISHRA vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. PRIN. SECY. LUCKNOW
Key Takeaways:- Absence in docs doesn't negate case existence; expand search scope.- Focus on principles: appellate restraint, evidence, inherent powers. State of Uttar Pradesh VS Ishaq - 2024 0 Supreme(All) 1604Manjinder Singh VS State Of Punjab - 2019 0 Supreme(SC) 1980- For precise needs, refer to official judgments.
Stay informed on UP legal developments—research diligence pays off!
References (Sample from sources):- Manjinder Singh VS State Of Punjab - 2019 0 Supreme(SC) 1980, State of Uttar Pradesh VS Ishaq - 2024 0 Supreme(All) 1604, RAMPRAKASH MISHRA vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. PRIN. SECY. LUCKNOW, Mathura Prasad VS Ajeem Khan - 1990 Supreme(SC) 255
#UPHighCourt #CaseCitation #LegalResearch
(FOR STAY) NO. 1 of 2023 In R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 1586 of 2023 ========================================================== DIVISIONAL MANAGER GUJARAT STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION Versus RAMPRAKASH MATAFER ========================================================== ... 17/08/2023 in R/FA/1586/2023 ] CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR STAY) NO. 1 of 2023 In R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 1586 of 2023 ========================================================== DIVISIONAL MANAGER GUJARAT STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION Versus ... RAMPRAKASH MATAFER ....
BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9511 of 2023 Applicant :- Ramprakash Mishra Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Prin. Secy. ... Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC-LKO:49705 Court No. - 14 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ... Heard learned counsel for the accused-applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. ... Order Date :- 28.7.2023 Anupam S/- Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM SINGH PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench This bail application h....
(KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA), J. ... Ramprakash @Anne & Anr.) ... Shri Alladin Khan, Public Prosecutor for State. ... /07 Ramprakash @Anne Vs. ... to Lal Singh and Manrup and he has intervened.
----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan ----Respondent Connected With 1. ... Balveer Singh Beniwal For Respondent(s) : Ms. Mahi Yadav, AAG with Mr. Kuldeep Singh Rathore & Ms. Saba Naaz Mr. Gopal Krishna Sharma, AGC with Mr. Saumil Sharma Mr. Saurabh Sharma, Ms. Anjali Ranga, Mr. Mahendra Pratap Singh, Mr. Anirudh Sharma, Ms. Anshul Sharma, Ms. Arya Garima for Mr. ... Surendra Singh Naruka, AAG with Mr. Jitendra Kumar Takar Mr. Basant Singh Chhaba, AAG with Mr. Rahul Gupta & Mr. S....
Durga Prasad Singh, AIR 1974 SC 2343 is the case on which strong reliance has been placed by learned counsel for Ajeem Khan. ... ... For Citation : AIR 1990 SC 2274 = 1990(2) JT 331 = 1990(3) SCC 659 ... paper of Ramprakash. ... correct identity of Ramprakash. ... Election of Legislative Assembly of the State of Madhya Pradesh was held in the month of February, 1985. One of the Constituencies was No. 14 Lahar (District Bhind).The nomination papers were filed before 6th February, 1985 and the scrutiny ....
RAMPRAKASH SINGH SIKARWAR (DEAD) THR. ITS LEGAL HEIRS 1. SMT. ... STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH THE COLLECTOR DISTRICT GWALIOR M.P. GWALIOR M.P. (MADHYA PRADESH) .....RESPONDENTS (BY SHRI C.P.SINGH - GOVT. ... SUMAN SIKARWAR W/O SHRI MAANPAL SINGH PAWAIYA D/O LATE SHRI RAMPRAKASH SINGH SIKARWAR KARTAR ENCALVE, BEHIND INDRALOK GARDEN, GUDI GUDA KA NAKA LASHKAR GWALIOR M.P. ... RAMPRAKASH SINGH SIKARWAR ....
State (NCT of Delhi), the Court, after referring to Munshi Singh Gautam v. State of M.P., Harbajan Singh v. ... The State may also recover from Ramprakash (P.W.1) and Manohar Singh (P.W.2) as arrears of land revenue. 30 36. ... State of M.P. ... (xvi) Manohar Singh (P.W.2) has stated that he was informed by Man Singh Rajput, Bharat Singh Rajput, Ram Singh Rajput and othe....
State (NCT of Delhi), the Court, after referring to Munshi Singh Gautam v. State of M.P., Harbajan Singh v. ... The State Govt. shall be free to recover the compensation amount from the salary/pension of Raghvendra Singh (P.W.5). The State may also recover from Ramprakash (P.W.1) and Manohar Singh (P.W.2) as arrears of land revenue. ... Manohar Singh (P.W.2) has stated that his brother Ramprakash ....
State (NCT of Delhi), the Court, after referring to Munshi Singh Gautam v. State of M.P., Harbajan Singh v. ... The State Govt. shall be free to recover the compensation amount from the salary/pension of Raghvendra Singh (P.W.5). The State may also recover from Ramprakash (P.W.1) and Manohar Singh (P.W.2) as arrears of land revenue. ... Manohar Singh (P.W.2) has stated that his brother Ramprakash ....
State (NCT of Delhi), the Court, after referring to Munshi Singh Gautam v. State of M.P., Harbajan Singh v. ... The State Govt. shall be free to recover the compensation amount from the salary/pension of Raghvendra Singh (P.W.5). The State may also recover from Ramprakash (P.W.1) and Manohar Singh (P.W.2) as arrears of land revenue. ... Manohar Singh (P.W.2) has stated that his brother Ramprakash ....
iii) Viswanathan - Vs - State (2018 SCC OnLine Hyd 484); iv) Dataram Singh - Vs - State of UP (2018 (3) SCC 22); vi) Sanjay Chandra - Vs - Central Bureau of Investigation (2012 (1) SCC 40); v) M.Kishore - Vs - Inspector of Police (2021 SCC OnLine Mad 113);
During investigation, PW-6 IO prepared site-map in the presence of informant and other witnesses. The incident took place allegedly on the mend of fields of both sides. Other details based on saying of some persons are not needed to be mentioned as per legal requirement. This view has been further affirmed by this court in State of UP vs Lakhan Singh, 2014 (86) ACC 82 (All) (DB).
The incident took place close to the latrine which has been shown in the site map. This view has been further affirmed by this court in State of UP vs Lakhan Singh, 2014 (86) ACC 82 (All) (DB). Other details based on saying of some persons are not needed to be mentioned as per legal requirement. During investigation, PW11 IO prepared site-map in the presence of informant on the same day.
This was reiterated in Ramprakash Agarwal Vs. Gopi Krishan (2013) 11 SCC 296).
Like all rules of procedure, this rule demands a construction which would promote this cause”. 16. Apex Court in State of Gujarat Vs. Ramprakash P Puri, (1969) 3 SCC 156. reiterated the position that an order can be recalled or reviewed in exercise of inherent power to rectify mistake of the court by saying: “Procedure has been described to be a handmaid and not a mistress of law, intended to subserve and facilitate the cause of justice and not to govern or obstruct it.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.