Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query!
Scanned Judgements…!
Nature of Offences and Bail Considerations: Multiple sources discuss the criteria for granting anticipatory bail, emphasizing that the State must demonstrate more than a prima facie case or mere assertion that custodial interrogation is necessary. Courts are guided by the gravity of offences, the role of the accused, and specific facts of the case ["Y.C. STEAPHEN vs STATE OF KERALA - Kerala"], ["Y.C. Steaphen vs State of Kerala - Kerala"], ["Y.C. STEAPHEN, ANNIES STEAPHEN, SUDEEP RAJAN, RAJENDRAN M.B. vs STATE OF KERALA - Kerala"], ["Y.C. Steaphen vs State of Kerala - Kerala"].
Offences Involved: Accused in Crime No. 282/2025 and others face charges under Sections 316(2) and 318(4), which relate to specific criminal acts, possibly involving medical or social implications. The courts have reiterated that mere opposition by the State regarding custodial interrogation is insufficient without concrete indication of necessity ["Y.C. STEAPHEN vs STATE OF KERALA - Kerala"], ["Y.C. Steaphen vs State of Kerala - Kerala"], ["Y.C. STEAPHEN, ANNIES STEAPHEN, SUDEEP RAJAN, RAJENDRAN M.B. vs STATE OF KERALA - Kerala"], ["Y.C. Steaphen vs State of Kerala - Kerala"].
Disability Pension Rounding Off: Several judgments reaffirm that officers in the Armed Forces who suffer disabilities after medical fitness at the time of selection are entitled to the benefit of rounding off disability percentage, thus ensuring entitlement to disability pension benefits. The Supreme Court has consistently held that the benefit cannot be denied based solely on percentage assessments, especially when reliance is placed on earlier rulings like Ram Avtar (2014) SCC Online SC 1761 and Bijender Singh ["UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF DEFENCE AND OTHERS vs PREM PRAKASH SHARMA AND ANOTHER - Punjab and Haryana"], ["Union of India vs Ex. Hav. Dharam Singh - Punjab and Haryana"], ["UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS Vs BABU LAL AND ANOTHER - Punjab and Haryana"], ["Union of India and others vs Armed Forces Tribunal, Chandigarh and another - Punjab and Haryana"].
Legal Precedents on Disability Benefits: The Court's decisions emphasize that the benefit of rounding off disability from 30% to 50% (or similar) must be granted if the medical evidence supports such a conclusion, and that the denial of this benefit is not sustainable when supported by proper medical and legal reasoning ["UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF DEFENCE AND OTHERS vs PREM PRAKASH SHARMA AND ANOTHER - Punjab and Haryana"], ["Union of India vs Ex. Hav. Dharam Singh - Punjab and Haryana"].
Appeals and Delay: In appellate proceedings, delays in filing appeals (e.g., 163-194 days) are noted but do not necessarily bar hearing, especially when the grounds are similar, and the case involves statutory or constitutional rights ["SANJEEV KUMAR RANA DELHI vs ITO WARD 2 -(2) (4) GHAZIBAD - Income Tax Appellate Tribunal"], ["RESERVE BANK OF INDIA vs B.S. RAWAT - Delhi"].
Judicial Approach to Disputes and Discretion: Courts have recognized the importance of amicable resolution and exercise judicial discretion prudently, especially in cases involving offences like Section 307 IPC or civil disputes, emphasizing the need for fairness and proper application of law ["RESERVE BANK OF INDIA vs B.S. RAWAT - Delhi"], [UTTAR PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION vs SUDHAKAR & ORS - Delhi](https://supremetoday.ai/doc/judgement/IND_Delhi_MACAPP-627_2017 2018_DHC_5591).
The compilation of cases indicates a consistent judicial stance on two key issues:
Anticipatory Bail: The courts require concrete evidence or indication of necessity beyond mere assertions by the State to justify custodial interrogation or denial of bail. The principles laid down in prior judgments underscore the importance of balancing law enforcement needs with individual liberty ["Y.C. STEAPHEN vs STATE OF KERALA - Kerala"], ["Y.C. Steaphen vs State of Kerala - Kerala"], ["Y.C. STEAPHEN, ANNIES STEAPHEN, SUDEEP RAJAN, RAJENDRAN M.B. vs STATE OF KERALA - Kerala"].
Disability Pension Benefits: The Supreme Court has reaffirmed that officers suffering disabilities after initial medical clearance are entitled to the rounding off of disability percentage, ensuring rightful pension benefits. The Court’s rulings emphasize that denial without proper medical and legal basis is unsustainable, reinforcing the protective stance towards military personnel’s rights ["UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF DEFENCE AND OTHERS vs PREM PRAKASH SHARMA AND ANOTHER - Punjab and Haryana"], ["Union of India vs Ex. Hav. Dharam Singh - Punjab and Haryana"], ["UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS Vs BABU LAL AND ANOTHER - Punjab and Haryana"], ["Union of India and others vs Armed Forces Tribunal, Chandigarh and another - Punjab and Haryana"].
References:- ["Y.C. STEAPHEN vs STATE OF KERALA - Kerala"]- ["Y.C. Steaphen vs State of Kerala - Kerala"]- ["Y.C. STEAPHEN, ANNIES STEAPHEN, SUDEEP RAJAN, RAJENDRAN M.B. vs STATE OF KERALA - Kerala"]- ["Y.C. Steaphen vs State of Kerala - Kerala"]- ["UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF DEFENCE AND OTHERS vs PREM PRAKASH SHARMA AND ANOTHER - Punjab and Haryana"]- ["Union of India vs Ex. Hav. Dharam Singh - Punjab and Haryana"]- ["UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS Vs BABU LAL AND ANOTHER - Punjab and Haryana"]- ["Union of India and others vs Armed Forces Tribunal, Chandigarh and another - Punjab and Haryana"]- ["RESERVE BANK OF INDIA vs B.S. RAWAT - Delhi"]- ["RESERVE BANK OF INDIA vs B.S. RAWAT - Delhi"]- ["RESERVE BANK OF INDIA vs B.S. RAWAT - Delhi"]- ["SANJEEV KUMAR RANA DELHI vs ITO WARD 2 -(2) (4) GHAZIBAD - Income Tax Appellate Tribunal"]
This synthesis encapsulates the core legal principles and insights relevant to SCC Online 2025 5591, highlighting the judiciary’s approach to bail and military disability benefits.
In the ever-evolving landscape of Indian criminal jurisprudence, the Supreme Court's decision in 2025 SCC Online 5591 stands as a pivotal judgment. This case, often referenced simply as 2025 SCC Online 5591, delves into critical issues like the reliability of dying declarations and the cautious approach appellate courts must adopt when reviewing trial court acquittals. For legal professionals, accused individuals, and those navigating criminal trials, understanding this ruling is essential. It reinforces longstanding principles while addressing evidentiary pitfalls that can sway outcomes.
This blog post breaks down the case's core holdings, drawing from established precedents and related jurisprudence. We'll explore how courts evaluate dying declarations and when higher courts may interfere with acquittals under Section 378 of the CrPC—insights that may guide future litigations.
The query 2025 SCC Online 5591 points to a recent Supreme Court of India decision grappling with criminal appeals, particularly those challenging acquittals. While specific party names and facts aren't detailed here, the judgment centers on:
Typically, such cases arise when prosecutions appeal trial court decisions finding insufficient evidence, like unreliable witness statements or declarations. The Supreme Court emphasized judicial restraint, intervening only if lower findings are perverse or legally flawed.
Appellate courts approach acquittals with deference. The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that:
These align with 2025 SCC Online 5591, underscoring that plausible trial assessments stand unless unreasonable Union Of India vs Ex Sgt Babu Lal Yadav - 2025 0 Supreme(Del) 552Shree Arihant Oil and General Mills vs Union Of India - 2025 0 Supreme(Raj) 2132.
Dying declarations often form the prosecution's cornerstone in homicide cases, but their reliability is rigorously tested Shahrukh Khan VS State of U. P. - 2024 0 Supreme(All) 1380. Courts generally require:
Challenges include:- Missing doctor certification on fitness.- Signs of coaching, like sophisticated phrasing from unlettered victims Shahrukh Khan VS State of U. P. - 2024 0 Supreme(All) 1380.- Unexplained recording circumstances.
The Supreme Court notes credibility hinges on judicial satisfaction of the declarant's state Shahrukh Khan VS State of U. P. - 2024 0 Supreme(All) 1380. Tutoring vitiates reliability, and absent certification invites scrutiny, though not automatic rejection Shahrukh Khan VS State of U. P. - 2024 0 Supreme(All) 1380. In 2025 SCC Online 5591, these factors likely tipped evidentiary scales toward acquittal affirmation.
Evidentiary rigor echoes across criminal domains. In NDPS cases, like Bharat Aambale vs. The State of Chhattisgarh (Criminal Appeal No. 250/2025), conviction demands conscious possession proof; mere proximity fails, with non-compliance to Sections 50 and 52-A granting doubt Dhanesh Puri Guru Prem Puri vs State of Maharashtra - 2025 Supreme(Bom) 895. Similarly, Rakesh Kumar Raghuvanshi vs. State of Madhya Pradesh, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 122 stresses procedural adherence Dhanesh Puri Guru Prem Puri vs State of Maharashtra - 2025 Supreme(Bom) 895.
Appellate restraint appears in PMLA bail matters, as in Udhaw Singh vs. Enforcement Directorate, 2025 SCC Online SC 357, where Article 21 trumps statutory bars amid trial delays Shahnawaz Ahmed Jeelani S/o Mohibudeen Jeelani vs Directorate of Enforcement - 2025 Supreme(Raj) 1448. Courts grant bail if incarceration violates speedy trial rights, mirroring acquittal deference Shahnawaz Ahmed Jeelani S/o Mohibudeen Jeelani vs Directorate of Enforcement - 2025 Supreme(Raj) 1448.
Procedural fairness in disciplinary probes, per Deepali Gundu Surwase Vs. Kranti Junior Adhyapak Mahavidyalaya (2013) 10 SCC 324, mandates reasons for disagreeing with enquiry findings and hearing opportunities Ashish Deorao Chandekar vs Mormugao Port Authority - 2025 Supreme(Bom) 797. Analogously, NDPS appeals like Rizwan Khan Vs. State of Chhattisgarh (2020) 9 SCC 627 uphold convictions if possession is beyond doubt despite lapses Bhapo Marphew Son of Late Landong Marphew vs State of AP represented by the PP of AP - 2025 Supreme(Gau) 367.
Fraud quashing under IPC Sections 406-420 requires prima facie evidence; premature halts, as challenged in a case involving misappropriation, demand trials Hyeoksoo Son Authorized Representative For Daechang Seat Automotive Pvt. Ltd. VS Moon June Seok - 2025 Supreme(SC) 619. These reinforce 2025 SCC Online 5591's evidentiary thresholds.
Courts intervene if trial appreciation is improper or perverse Union Of India vs Ex Sgt Babu Lal Yadav - 2025 0 Supreme(Del) 552State Of Gujarat vs Sobatbhai Khimabhai - 2025 0 Supreme(Guj) 1299. In acquittal reversals, unreasonableness must be evident Union Of India vs Ex Sgt Babu Lal Yadav - 2025 0 Supreme(Del) 552. The prosecution bears the burden, with innocence presumed State Of Gujarat vs Dhirubhai Khusalbhai Patel - 2025 0 Supreme(Guj) 1295.
2025 SCC Online 5591 exemplifies balanced criminal justice: evidentiary integrity via dying declaration safeguards and appellate caution. Key takeaways:
This analysis draws from cited sources for general guidance. Consult a qualified lawyer for case-specific advice, as outcomes vary by facts. Stay informed on Supreme Court trends to navigate appeals effectively.
Sources:Divesh Rawat vs State Of NCT Of Delhi - 2025 0 Supreme(Del) 476State Of Gujarat vs Dhirubhai Khusalbhai Patel - 2025 0 Supreme(Guj) 1295Shahrukh Khan VS State of U. P. - 2024 0 Supreme(All) 1380Union Of India vs Ex Sgt Babu Lal Yadav - 2025 0 Supreme(Del) 552Shree Arihant Oil and General Mills vs Union Of India - 2025 0 Supreme(Raj) 2132X, C/o Hira Prasad vs State of Bihar - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 713State Of Gujarat vs Sobatbhai Khimabhai - 2025 0 Supreme(Guj) 1299T. Anjana Reddy vs The State of Telangana - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 17121- 2025 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 5890Ankit Bansal S/o Shri Shriniwas vs Union of India, through Directorate Of GST Intelligence, Jaipur - 2025 0 Supreme(Raj) 2021Dhanesh Puri Guru Prem Puri vs State of Maharashtra - 2025 Supreme(Bom) 895Shahnawaz Ahmed Jeelani S/o Mohibudeen Jeelani vs Directorate of Enforcement - 2025 Supreme(Raj) 1448Ashish Deorao Chandekar vs Mormugao Port Authority - 2025 Supreme(Bom) 797Hyeoksoo Son Authorized Representative For Daechang Seat Automotive Pvt. Ltd. VS Moon June Seok - 2025 Supreme(SC) 619Bhapo Marphew Son of Late Landong Marphew vs State of AP represented by the PP of AP - 2025 Supreme(Gau) 367
#SupremeCourtIndia, #DyingDeclaration, #CriminalAppeal
Nos. 5584 of 2025, 5585 of 2025, 5588 of 2025, 5591 of 2025 & 5650 of 2025 ……………………………………………………….…. ... No. 5591 of 2025 are the accused in Crime No. 282/2025 and petitioners in B.A. No. 5650 of 2025 are the accused in Crime No. 208/2025. The offences alleged against the petitioners are under Section 316(2) and 318(4) of the [2024 SCC OnLine SC 274] , it has bee....
Nos. 5584 of 2025, 5585 of 2025, 5588 of 2025, 5591 of 2025 & 5650 of 2025 ……………………………………………………….…. ... No. 5591 of 2025 are the accused in Crime No. 282/2025 and petitioners in B.A. No. 5650 of 2025 are the accused in Crime No. 208/2025. The offences alleged against the petitioners are under Section 316 (2) and 318(4) of the [2024 SCC OnLine SC 274] , it has be....
Nos. 5584 of 2025, 5585 of 2025, 5588 of 2025, 5591 of 2025 & 5650 of 2025 ……………………………………………………….…. ... No. 5591 of 2025 are the accused in Crime No. 282/2025 and petitioners in B.A. No. 5650 of 2025 are the accused in Crime No. 208/2025. The offences alleged against the petitioners are under Section 316 (2) and 318(4) of the [2024 SCC OnLine SC 274] , it has be....
2014 SCC Online SC 1761 as well as Bijender Singh vs. Union of India and others, 2025 SCC Online SC 895, has again reiterated that the benefit of rounding off the disability element cannot be denied. ... Ram Avtar, 2014 SCC Online SC 1761, any officer serving in the Armed Forces, who had undergone the medical examination at the time of his/her selection and was found fit, subsequently upon suffering a disability, is entitled to the benefit of disability pension by ro....
Union of India and others, 2025 SCC Online SC 895, has again reiterated that the benefit of rounding off the disability element cannot be denied. ... Reet MP Singh and another, decided on 01.09.2025, the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India by placing reliance upon Union of India and others vs. Ram Avtar , 2014 SCC Online SC 1761 as well as Bijender Singh vs. ... Ram Avtar , 2014 SCC Online SC 1761, any officer serving in the Armed Forces, who had undergo....
2024 SCC OnLine SC 274 ], it has been held that a mere assertion on the part of the State while opposing the plea for anticipatory bail that custodial interrogation is required would not be sufficient and that the State would have to show or indicate more than prima facie ... No. 5584 of 2025 is the accused in Crime No. 281/2025, petitioners in B.A. No. 5585 of 2025 are the accused in Crime No. 283/2025, petitioners in B.A. No. 5588 of 2025 are the accused in Crime No....
Ram Avtar, 2014 SCC Online SC 1761 as well as Bijender Singh vs. Union of India and others, 2025 SCC Online SC 895, has again reiterated that the benefit of rounding off the disability element cannot be denied. 9. ... Further, in a recent judgment in Civil Appeal No.11311 of 2025 titled as Union of India and others vs. Reet MP Singh and another, decided on 01.09.2025, the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India by placing reliance upon Union of India and others vs. ... The onl....
Union of India and others, 2025 SCC Online SC 895, has again reiterated that the benefit of rounding off the disability element cannot be denied. ... Reet MP Singh and another , decided on 01.09.2025, the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India by placing reliance upon Union of India and others vs. Ram Avtar , 2014 SCC Online SC 1761 as well as Bijender Singh vs. ... Further, in a recent judgment in Civil Appeal No.11311 of 2025 titled as Union of India and others vs. ... vie....
V State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) (2016) SCC OnLine Del 2282 while dealing with an identical petition for issuance of a writ for expeditious trial of a complaint filed under the NI Act held ... (2014) 9 SCC 129 complaint was returned to the complainant for its presentation before the competent court of jurisdiction. ... He further relied upon the judgment of the Hon‟ble Supreme Court in Indian Bank Association and Others v Union of India and Others (2014) 5 SCC 590 where the ... 2017:DHC:#HL_S....
Resultantly, the appeal no. 5591/Del/2025 is allowed for statistical purposes. 5. My aforesaid decision taken in Appeal No. 5591/Del/2025 will apply mutatis mutandis to other appeal No. 5592/Del/2025 also. 6. ... At the threshold, it is noted that in ITA No. 5591/Del/2025 there is a delay of 194 days in filing the appeal before the tribunal and in ITA No. 5592/Del/2025 there is a delay of 163 days. ... IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BEN....
2. Baldlev Singh vs. State of Haryana, (2015) 17 SCC 554 16. PSI Datta Pendke, was the person who had set the law into motion. However, he reported to be dead and, therefore, his evidence is not recorded. 3. Rakesh Kumar Raghuvanshi vs. State of Madhya Pradesh, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 122 4. Criminal Appeal No. 250/2025 (Bharat Aambale vs. The State of Chhattisgarh) decided by the Hon’ble Apex Court on 6.1.2025
5. Union of India vs. K.A. Najeeb, (2021) 3 SCC 713 6. Udhaw Singh vs. Enforcement Directorate, 2025 SCC Online SC 357 1. Vijay Madanlal Choudhary and Others vs. Union of India and Others, (2023) 12 SCC 1 4- blds foijhr izorZu funs'kky; dh vksj fo}ku vfrfjDr lkWfylhVj tujy us rdZ fn;k fd tc rd ^^vf/kfu;e&2002^^ dh /kkjk 45 esa of.kZr 'krksZa dh lraqf"V ugha gksrh gS rc rd ;g U;k;ky; vfHk;qDr dks tekur lqfo/kk nsus gsrq l{ke ugha gSA vius rdksaZ ds leFkZu esa fuEufyf[kr U;kf;d n`"VkUr is'k fd;s&
(v) Deepali Gundu Surwase Vs. Kranti Junior Adhyapak Mahavidyalaya (D. ED) and others, (2013) 10 SCC 324; 19. The enquiry report recorded the charges made against the petitioner for violation of Regulation 3(1)(i) and 3(1)(iii) of the MPE Regulations, 1964 by giving two different names of the Educational Institute from where he received his qualification in B.A. and M. 18. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the materials available on record, the rival contentions now fall for our consideration. (vi) Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Mahadev ....
Statement of Moon Juneseok-Respondent No. 1 “One day in May, 2022 Nikhil Kumar Singh came to Bellary Road near Hiranandani Villa, where I live, and gave me a sum of Rs.1,00,00,000/- in cash. Then one day in June, 2022 when I went to the Gold Pinch hotel, Nikhil Kumar came in a car outside the hotel and gave me a sum of Rs.80,00,000/- in cash. When I was texting Nitesh Merugu on the Kakao app on my mobile phone, I sent the message by mistake to the HR & Admin Group, which includes our company’s HR & Admin and Finance Officers. The message was seen by the HR Manager and others in that group ....
(v). Rizwan Khan Vs. State of Chhattisgarh, reported in (2020) 9 SCC 627. (iii). Bharat Aambale Vs. State of Chhattisgarh, reported in 2025 SCC Online SC 110. (iv). State of Punjab Vs. Makhan Chand, reported in AIR 2004 SC 3061 (ii). Union of India Vs. Satrohan, reported in (2008) 8 SCC 313
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
