Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
In the bustling villages of Telangana, land disputes often revolve around classifications like Grama Kantam (also known as Gramakantam or Grama Natham). Homeowners and prospective buyers frequently ask: Citations on Telangana Grama Kantam lands – do these automatically belong to the government or Gram Panchayat? This question touches on critical issues of vesting, registration, and eviction, affecting countless families relying on these sites for habitation.
This blog post breaks down the legal landscape, drawing from statutes, Board Standing Orders (BSO), Government Orders (G.O.s), and court rulings. While this provides general insights, it is not legal advice – consult a qualified lawyer for your specific situation.
Grama Kantam lands are traditionally village sites designated for building houses, huts, or backyards. They are not automatically government property. Key statutes explicitly exclude them from vesting:
Under Section 2 of the A.P. Land Encroachment Act, 1905, such lands are saved from government ownership save as temple sites, house-sites, or backyards. Courts have held: A house-site owned by a person in what is generally known as gramanatham is not, under Madras Act III of 1905, property of the Government. Bayya Mahadeva Sastry VS State Of Andhra Pradesh - 2020 0 Supreme(AP) 447 (citing S. Rengaraja Iyengar v. Achikannu Ammal, (1959) 2 MLJ 513). Karri Raghavulu VS Secretary, Registration & Stamps Dept. - 2015 0 Supreme(AP) 116Sagadapu Vijaya VS State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. , by its Principal Secretary - 2015 0 Supreme(AP) 192
The Madras Estates (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1948 (applicable to Telangana/Andhra) does not transfer title in occupied Grama Natham house-sites to the government: Section 3(b) of Madras Act XXVI of 1948 does not have the effect of transferring to the Government title to a housesite within a gramanatham belonging to a person other than the landholder. Bayya Mahadeva Sastry VS State Of Andhra Pradesh - 2020 0 Supreme(AP) 447The Executive Officer, Kadathur Town Panchayat, Harur Taluk, Dharmapuri District VS V. Swaminathan and others - 2004 0 Supreme(Mad) 705
These exclusions confirm that occupied portions typically remain private.
No automatic vesting occurs under the A.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1994. Section 58(1) lists specific poramboke lands like grazing grounds, tanks, and threshing floors that vest in panchayats – notably omitting village sites or Grama Kantam: The village site poramboke/Grama Kantam land is conspicuous by its absence in the category of lands enumerated in sub-section (1) of Section 58 of the Act. K. Vedavathi VS V. Chenchamma - 2023 0 Supreme(AP) 1599Karri Raghavulu VS Secretary, Registration & Stamps Dept. - 2015 0 Supreme(AP) 116
Panchayats must prove title independently: It shall be the responsibility of the Grama Panchayat to protect its interest. Kusume Subba Raju VS State of Andhra Pradesh - Andhra Pradesh (2021) (citing G.O.Ms.No.187). In Banne Gandhi v. Dist. Collector (2007 SCC OnLine AP 136): It is not possible to enlarge these items by including the Government land classified as grama kantam land. K. Vedavathi VS V. Chenchamma - 2023 0 Supreme(AP) 1599
Entries in Resettlement Registers (RSR), like Column 4 marked 'G' for Government village, are for identification only: The purpose of furnishing details under column 4 of RSR is to identify where the lands are situated... cannot be treated as conclusion ownership of Government on Gramakantam lands. Karri Raghavulu VS Secretary, Registration & Stamps Dept. - 2015 0 Supreme(AP) 116Sagadapu Vijaya VS State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. , by its Principal Secretary - 2015 0 Supreme(AP) 192
Board Standing Orders (BSO) treat unoccupied Grama Kantam as available for future house-site allotments (up to 35 cents tax-free) under BSO 15 (Paras 2-3) and BSO 21(4): village site poramboke land (grama natham area/grama kantam land) always vests in the Government and is intended for being allotted as house sites in future. K. Vedavathi VS V. Chenchamma - 2023 0 Supreme(AP) 1599 However, this does not apply to occupied private sites, yielding to statutory exclusions. Kusume Subba Raju VS State of Andhra Pradesh - Andhra Pradesh (2021)
Sub-Registrars once refused registration based on classification, but G.O.Ms.No.100 (22.02.2014) adding Grama Kantam to prohibitory lists was cancelled by G.O.Ms.No.56 (16.02.2015): The effect of cancellation is that... the Sub-Registrar... shall not refuse to receive a document for registration. Karri Raghavulu VS Secretary, Registration & Stamps Dept. - 2015 0 Supreme(AP) 116Sagadapu Vijaya VS State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. , by its Principal Secretary - 2015 0 Supreme(AP) 192
Recent developments affirm registration for existing structures. Under the Telangana Panchayat Raj Act, 2018, Section 113(8) allows plots with existing buildings: Provided that it shall not be applicable to plots of land in Grama Kantam having an existing building. Nasreen Sultana W/o Shaik Mohd. Ateeq VS State of Telangana - 2022 Supreme(Telangana) 185 Structures under Building Regularisation Scheme (BRS)/Building Penalisation Scheme (BPS) can also be registered. Nasreen Sultana W/o Shaik Mohd. Ateeq VS State of Telangana - 2022 Supreme(Telangana) 185
In a writ petition under Article 14, courts directed authorities to process sale/gift deeds, rejecting blanket refusals: Sale of properties is a continuing process... it would be just and proper to issue general directions to the Government/registering authorities to entertain registration of documents. (Telangana Municipalities Act, 2019 - Sections 172(16), 178(3); Telangana Panchayat Raj Act, 2018 - Section 113(8)). Nasreen Sultana W/o Shaik Mohd. Ateeq VS State of Telangana - 2022 Supreme(Telangana) 185
Refusal based solely on classification is prima facie presumptuous. Karri Raghavulu VS Secretary, Registration & Stamps Dept. - 2015 0 Supreme(AP) 116 Courts like in Sagadapu Vijaya v. State of A.P. (2015) 4 ALD 88 direct registration. Karri Raghavulu VS Secretary, Registration & Stamps Dept. - 2015 0 Supreme(AP) 116Kusume Subba Raju VS State of Andhra Pradesh - Andhra Pradesh (2021)
Evictions require proper adjudication, not summary action. For instance, in a dispute over a water plant on alleged Grama Kantam: Respondents are inclined to evict petitioner from schedule property, they have to follow due process of law for eviction. Kameswaramma VS State of Andhra Pradesh - 2019 Supreme(AP) 163
The Supreme Court in AIR 1982 SC 1081 allows eviction with penal charges for unauthorized occupation, but only after due process. Sri. Jambula Venkat Reddy vs The State of Telangana - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 77044
Title disputes demand civil suits; long possession (e.g., 40+ years) bolsters claims. Verify against deeds/pattas. Bayya Mahadeva Sastry VS State Of Andhra Pradesh - 2020 0 Supreme(AP) 447
In acquisition contexts, classifications like Grama Kantam are noted but do not bar proceedings if public purpose is shown. Madala Rama Rao VS District Collector, Krishna District - 2013 Supreme(AP) 119
References:1. Karri Raghavulu VS Secretary, Registration & Stamps Dept. - 2015 0 Supreme(AP) 116: RSR/BSO analysis, registration directives.2. Sagadapu Vijaya VS State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. , by its Principal Secretary - 2015 0 Supreme(AP) 192: G.O. effects, exclusions.3. K. Vedavathi VS V. Chenchamma - 2023 0 Supreme(AP) 1599: Section 58 inapplicability.4. Bayya Mahadeva Sastry VS State Of Andhra Pradesh - 2020 0 Supreme(AP) 447: Comprehensive vesting review.5. Kusume Subba Raju VS State of Andhra Pradesh - Andhra Pradesh (2021): Panchayat burden.6. Nasreen Sultana W/o Shaik Mohd. Ateeq VS State of Telangana - 2022 Supreme(Telangana) 185: 2018 Act registration.7. Kameswaramma VS State of Andhra Pradesh - 2019 Supreme(AP) 163: Eviction process.
For personalized guidance, seek legal counsel. Stay informed on Telangana land laws to protect your rights!
#GramaKantam #TelanganaLandLaws #PropertyRights
Grama Kantam is not a Government land and there is no prohibition to undertake transactions on the said lands. In fact, Gramakantam describes the area identified for the purpose of construction of residential houses and incidental structures in a village. ... kantam land. ... Kantam land. ... However, in the present case, the document presented by the petitioner describes the property merely as “Grama Kantam” with Municipal Door No.3-504/A/1 and PTIN No.1264138355. ......
Grama Kantam is not a Government land and there is no prohibition to undertake transactions on the said lands. In fact, Gramakantam describes the area identified for the purpose of construction of residential houses and incidental structures in a village. ... kantam land. ... Kantam land. ... However, in the present case, the document presented by the petitioner describes the property merely as “Grama Kantam” with Municipal Door No.3-504/A/1 and PTIN No.1264138355. ......
Grama Kantam is not a Government land and there is no prohibition to undertake transactions on the said lands. In fact, Gramakantam describes the area identified for the purpose of construction of residential houses and incidental structures in a village. ... kantam land. ... Kantam land. ... However, in the present case, the document presented by the petitioner describes the property merely as “Grama Kantam” with Municipal Door No.3-504/A/1 and PTIN No.1264138355. ......
The land appears to be open land and the petitioners also admit that it is located in Grama Kantam. ... The judgments of this Court in various cases relied upon by the learned counsel for the petitioners are to the effect that Grama Kantam land is neither Government land nor does it belong to Gram Panchayat. ... It is stated that even though the subject land is Grama Kantam land, it is not the land of the Gram Panchayat and therefore, the action of the respondents in issuing the notice....
1 AIR 1982 SC 1081 for eviction and also collect the penal charges for occupation of the Grama
If Grama Kantam lands are used as dwelling houses can be considered and to be treated as private property and therefore the impugned letter is not sustainable and requested to set aside the same. 5. ... While it being so, the respondent No.2 issued Memo No.12-09-2018 directing the Panchayat Secretary to remove the structures stating that it is a Grama Kantam Land. ... issued impugned letter stating that the petitioner is in possession of 90 Sq.Yards of Grama Kantam la....
He points out that the Grama Kantam has been defined as the name given to certain lands in which houses, huts and structures can be erected. In the State of Andhra Pradesh such lands are classified as Grama Kantam and in the State of Tamilnadu, these lands are classified as Grama Natham. ... After hearing both the learned counsel, this Court notices that the issue about the Grama Kantam lands is n....
He points out that the Grama Kantam has been defined as the name given to certain lands in which houses, huts and structures can be erected. In the State of Andhra Pradesh such lands are classified as Grama Kantam and in the State of Tamilnadu, these lands are classified as Grama Natham. ... Learned counsel for the petitioners points out that it is admitted in the counter affidavit that the lands in Sy.Nos.217/5, 6 and 7 are private....
permissions in respect of Grama Kantam Lands and open spaces in the village. ... Grama Kantam Land is not a Government Land and there is no prohibition to undertake transactions on the said lands. In fact, Gramakantam describes the area identified for the purpose of construction of residential houses and incidental structures in village. ... Further some of the villagers have already constructed houses in the Grama Kantam land of Bahcupally village a....
Kantam lands are exempted from insisting for production of NOC for registration of a document executed, conveying Grama Kantam property and on the strength of this G.O., learned counsel for the petitioner requested to issue a direction, since the subject land is less than Ac.0.20 cents. ... Therefore, the Government hereby order that the District Collectors shall withdraw the Grama Kantam lands from the lists of properties prohibited from registration furnished to the....
The structures which have proceedings under BRS (Building Regularisation Scheme)/BPS (Building Penalisation Scheme) schemes issued by the Government from time to time can be registered. However, existing buildings in Grama Kantam can be registered as per provisions of Telangana Panchayat Raj Act, 2018.
Whereas, the contention of the 6th respondent is that said construction of the water plant was made in Sy. No. 87, which is a grama kantam site. The petitioner has no right over the grama kantam land and therefore, the respondents are taking steps for eviction of the petitioner from the grama kantam site where the water plant was constructed for public purpose.
The Gramakantam land is not included in the above two definitions. Both in the estate villages and ryotwari villages i.e., villages controlled by the Government houses, huts etc., were constructed on the land specially earmarked for the said purpose. The word ‘Grama Kantam’ (Telugu) and ‘Grama Natham’ (Tamil) are used in various revenue records in Andhra Area which were part of composite Madras State. Most of these lands are in occupation of private individuals.
Both in the estate villages and ryotwari villages i.e., villages controlled by the Government, houses, huts etc., were constructed on the land specially earmarked for the said purpose. Most of these lands are in occupation of private individuals. The word ‘Grama Kantam’ (Telugu) and ‘Grama Natham’ (Tamil) are used in revenue records in Andhra Area which were part of composite Madras State. The Gramakantam land is not included in the above two definitions.
A perusal of this statement shows that Survey No. 78/1 comprises Ac.1-30 cents and Survey No. 78/3 comprises Ac.0.56 cents, which are classified as "payakanadoddi" (land used for attending to nature calls). Apart from the question whether these lands are suitable or not, it is not the pleaded case of the petitioners that they are all situated contiguous to each other. More over, even if the total extent of these survey numbers is considered, it will not constitute Acs.4-00, which is required by the respondents. Survey No. 272/1 comprises Ac.1-51 cents classified as "grama kantam".#....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
