AI Overview...
Can You Challenge a Section's Validity on Excessive Delegation?
In Indian constitutional law, the question Whether Validity of a Section can be Challanged on the Ground of Excessive Deligation arises frequently when statutes empower executives or delegates with broad powers without sufficient guidelines. This blog post examines this core issue, drawing from Supreme Court and High Court precedents. We'll explore when such challenges succeed, the tests applied by courts, and key principles. Note: This is general information based on case law, not specific legal advice. Consult a lawyer for your situation.
What is Excessive Delegation of Legislative Power?
Delegated legislation occurs when Parliament or state legislatures confer rulemaking powers on executives to implement laws efficiently. However, this power isn't unlimited. Article 14 (equality) and separation of powers principles demand legislative policy and guidelines to prevent arbitrariness.
Courts invalidate sections if they confer unguided or unbridled power, amounting to the legislature abdicating its essential functions. As held, a section would still not be ultra vires, if guideline could be gathered from Preamble, Object and Reason and other provisions of the Act and Rules Consumer Action Group VS State Of T. N. - 2000 5 Supreme 602.
Key Tests for Validity
- Intelligible Guideline Test: Must provide clear policy direction. Wide discretion is okay if controlled by statutory objectives Nayadu N. J. and Co v. Administrator of the City of Nagpur - 1970 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 3.
- Non-Abdication Principle: Legislature can't surrender core law-making to executives Rajnarain Singh VS Chairman, Patna Administration Committee, Patna - 1952 Supreme(Pat) 147.
- Reasonableness Check: Power must align with Articles 14, 19, and 21; arbitrary exercise is quashable, not always the section itself DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION VS D. T. C. MAZDOOR CONGRESS ANB - 1990 Supreme(SC) 493.
Landmark Cases Upholding Delegated Powers
Indian courts lean towards presumption of constitutionality, striking down only if delegation is excessive or lacks guidelines.
1. Tamil Nadu Town Planning Act - Section 113 Valid
In a challenge to Section 113 (exemption powers), the court ruled: Section 113 does not suffer from vice of excessive delegation of any legislative function—Power under Section 113 given to Government is neither unbridled nor without any guidelines Consumer Action Group VS State Of T. N. - 2000 5 Supreme 602. Guidelines from Preamble, Objects, and provisions like Sections 2(13), 9-C, 15 sufficed. Even 62 G.O.s were quashed for arbitrary exercise, not the section.
2. City of Nagpur Corporation Act - Section 114 Upheld
Tax imposition under Section 114 (including theater tax) survived challenge: S.114 does provide adequate guidance, dismissing challenges to the tax's validity based on excessive delegation principles Nayadu N. J. and Co v. Administrator of the City of Nagpur - 1970 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 3. Precedent from M/s Devi Das v. State of Punjab emphasized legislative guidance in taxation.
3. SARFAESI Act - Section 2(1)(o) Constitutional
NPA classification power to RBI/banks upheld: Delegation of legislative powers not violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) M/S HOLYSTAR NATURAL RESOURCES PVT. LTD. & ANR vs UNION OF INDIA & ANR - 2014 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 284. RBI guidelines bounded discretion; presumption favors economic laws unless palpably arbitrary.
4. M.P. Municipalities Act - Section 129 Valid
Export tax delegation to state: The delegation of power to the State Government is valid and does not amount to excessive delegation MEERA KHANDELWAL VS STATE OF M. P. - 1996 Supreme(MP) 35. Not violative of Articles 301, 304(b), 19(1)(g).
When Challenges Succeed: Instances of Invalidity
Not all delegations pass muster. Courts intervene if power is uncanalised.
- West Bengal Estates Act - Section 5A: Upheld, as delegation limited to state officers; power to delegate exercise of such statutory right... is within legislative competence Sahiruddin Ahmed VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL - 1962 Supreme(Cal) 175.
- Madras Co-op Societies Act - Section 60: Valid, as it advanced Act's policy from Preamble Registrar Of Co Operative Societies, Trivandrum VS K. Kunjabmu - 1979 Supreme(SC) 504. High Court struck notification, but Supreme Court reversed.
- Domestic Violence Act - Sections 13(2), 37(2)(j): No excessive delegation; procedural gaps appealable, not unconstitutional KUNHAMMU & OTHERS Vs PROTECTION OFFICER, AND OTHERS - 2008 Supreme(Online)(KER) 2071.
In U.P. Panchayat Laws Amendment Act, 2007, powers to D.M./State for abolishing offices held valid: does not suffer from vice of excessive delegation MAMTA KANNAUJIA VS STATE OF U. P. - 2009 Supreme(All) 451.
However, mechanical or arbitrary exercises (e.g., 62 exemption G.O.s in TN case) get quashed, reinforcing that exercise, not just provision, is scrutinized Consumer Action Group VS State Of T. N. - 2000 5 Supreme 602.
Principles from Supreme Court on Death Penalty & Analogous Contexts
Broader contexts like CrPC Section 354(3) (death sentence) show courts demand special reasons as guidelines: neither circumstance... constitutes a 'special reason' for imposing death sentence within meaning of Section 354(3) Bachan Singh State Of Punjab And Mal Singh: Sunil Batra: Nathu Singh: Kartar Singh And Ujagar Singh: Sher Singh: Sunil Batra: Mal Singh: Nirpal Singh: Jagmohan Singh: Ujjagar Singh VS Union Of India: Union Of India: Union Of India: Delhi Administration: State Of Punjab: Delhi Administration: State Of Haryana: State Of Haryana: State Of Haryana: State Of Punjab - 1980 Supreme(SC) 279. Similar scrutiny applies to delegations.
Article 311(2) proviso (service matters) upheld if reasons recorded, preventing abuse DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION VS D. T. C. MAZDOOR CONGRESS ANB - 1990 Supreme(SC) 493, mirroring delegation safeguards.
Checklist: Grounds to Challenge a Section
To assess if you can challenge:
- Lack of Guidelines? Check Preamble, Objects, surrounding sections.
- Unbridled Discretion? Does it allow policy-making?
- Policy Declaration? Implied from Act's scheme?
- Article 14 Violation? Arbitrary classification?
- Precedents? Economic laws get deference.
| Factor | Valid Example | Invalid Risk |
|--------|--------------|--------------|
| Guidelines | Preamble/Objectives Consumer Action Group VS State Of T. N. - 2000 5 Supreme 602 | None Registrar Of Co Operative Societies, Trivandrum VS K. Kunjabmu - 1979 Supreme(SC) 504 (but upheld) |
| Scope | Exemptions for development Consumer Action Group VS State Of T. N. - 2000 5 Supreme 602 | Total abdication |
| Review | Exercise quashable Consumer Action Group VS State Of T. N. - 2000 5 Supreme 602 | Section intact |
Conclusion & Key Takeaways
Yes, validity of a section can be challenged on excessive delegation grounds, but success is rare. Courts typically uphold if guidelines exist from Preamble, policy, or provisions, as in Sections 113 (TN Act) Consumer Action Group VS State Of T. N. - 2000 5 Supreme 602, 114 (Nagpur) Nayadu N. J. and Co v. Administrator of the City of Nagpur - 1970 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 3, and 2(1)(o) (SARFAESI) M/S HOLYSTAR NATURAL RESOURCES PVT. LTD. & ANR vs UNION OF INDIA & ANR - 2014 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 284. Delegations serve practical needs in dynamic scenarios but mustn't abdicate legislative core.
Key Takeaways:
- Presumption Favors Validity: Clear policy saves wide powers.
- Scrutinize Exercise: Arbitrary use quashable via writs.
- Economic/Administrative Deference: Courts hesitate unless blatant.
- Remedies: Article 226/32 petitions; appeals for procedural lapses.
This evolves with cases like privacy rights under Article 21 JUSTICE K S PUTTASWAMY (RETD. ) VS UNION OF INDIA - 2017 Supreme(SC) 772, emphasizing balanced state power. For tailored advice, consult legal experts—outcomes depend on facts.
Disclaimer: This post summarizes precedents for education. Laws change; seek professional counsel.
Search Results for "Can You Challenge Section Validity on Excessive Delegation?"
1980 0 Supreme(SC) 279 • India - Supreme Court
A. C. GUPTA, N. L. UNTWALIA, P. N. BHAGWATI, R. S. SARKARIA, Y. V. CHANDRACHUD
"special reason" for imposing death sentence within meaning of Section 354 (3) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1974 - Reliance for ... 302 - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 354 (3) - Impose Extreme Penalty Of ... href=act:433~Art.19>19 and 21 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section ... The constitutional validity of the amended statutory scheme of Georgia was challenged befor....
1985 0 Supreme(SC) 229 • India - Supreme Court
D. P. MADAN, M. P. THAKKAR, R. S. PATHAK, V. D. TULZAPURKAR, Y. V. CHANDRACHUD
EXECUTIVE INSTRUCTIONS - ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS - TAKING AWAY OF EMPLOYMENT IN PUBLIC INTERST UNDER SECOND PROVISO TO ARTICLE 311 ... Livelihood is a matter of concern to the individual and his family as also a matter of public interest and in appropriate case public ... (2) WITHOUT FORMAL PROCEEDINGS - LARGE SCALE BREAKDOWN OF DISCIPLINE—HOLDING OF FORMAL ENQUIrY UNDER ARTICLE 311(2) NOT POSSIBLE—DISPENSED ... In ....
1973 0 Supreme(SC) 163 • India - Supreme Court
S. M. SIKRI, J. M. SHELAT, K. S. HEGDE, A. N. GROVER, A. N. RAY, P. JAGANMOHAN REDDY, D. G. PALEKAR, H. R. KHANNA, K. K. MATHEW, M. H. BEG, S. N. DWIVEDI, A. K. MUKHERJEA, Y. V. CHANDRACHUD
never suffer the validity of a statute to be questioned on the ground of its having been passed or being kept alive in opposition ... The proposition holds good whether the validity of the impugned provision turns on whether the subject-matter, falls within or without ... The appellant challenged the validity of#HL_E....
1994 0 Supreme(SC) 1 • India - Supreme Court
S.C.AGRAWAL, R.M.SAHAI, M.M.PUNCHHI, K.RAMASWAMY, S.R.PANDIAN
validity of Section 9 of the Code of Criminal Procedure Act, 1976 by which Legislative Assembly of Uttar Pradesh has deleted Section ... to Section 19 convictions are for offences other Sections 3 and 4 of Act 28 of 1987 the accused may be entitled to file an appeal ... and 20(3) - Northern Ireland (Emergency Provisions) Act of 1973 - Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Criminal Law Act of#HL_EN....
1981 0 Supreme(SC) 509 • India - Supreme Court
Y. V. CHANDRACHUD, V. D. TULZAPURKAR, P. N. BHAGWATI, D. A. DESAI, A. C. GUPTA
RESTRICTION ON ORDINANCE MAKING POWER - NATIONAL SECURITY ACT—VALIDITY - NATIONAL SECURITY ORDINANCE—VALIDITY ... Article 357(1)(a) are legislative in character and made in exercise of legislative power. ... br>-held, ordinances and laws made by the President or his delegate under ... Sales Tax Act, 1948, which was challenged on the ground of excessive delegation, provided for levying taxes at such rates as may .......
1996 0 Supreme(MP) 35 • India - Madhya Pradesh
A.K.MATHUR, S.C.PANDEY
Fact of the Case: The petitioner challenged the constitutional validity of Section 129 of the M. P. ... The delegation of power to the State Government is valid and does not amount to excessive delegation. 4. ... valid and did not amount....
1979 0 Supreme(SC) 504 • India - Supreme Court
R.S.SARKARIA, O.CHHINNAPPA REDDY
of the view that Section 60 is not void on the ground of excessive delegation of legislative power - Court so declare and otherwise ... Wages Act - Section 27 – Trade - Unconstitutional delegation - Perennial, nagging problem of delegated legislation and so-called ... surviving interest - St....
1970 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 3 • India - Bombay High Court
, J
(g) for additional taxes, was challenged as excessive delegation of power. ... The Court concluded that S.114 does provide adequate guidance, dismissing challenges to the tax's validity based on excessive delegation ... (A) City of Nagpur Corporation Act, 1948 - Section 114 - Provision for taxation laid down, including theater....
2014 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 284 • India - High Court of Delhi
N.V. Ramana, CJ, Manmohan, J
... ... Issues: The primary issues were whether Section 2(1)(o) allowed for excessive delegation of power and if it violated Articles ... validity challenged - Definitions of Non-Performing Assets (NPAs) considered - No guidelines reasoned - Delegation of legislative ... regarding NPAs in Section 2(1)(o) of the#HL_E....
1962 0 Supreme(Cal) 175 • India - Calcutta
BANERJEE
The petitioner challenged the validity of section 5a on the ground of excessive delegation of power and also challenged the finding ... WEST BENGAL ESTATES ACQUISITION ACT, 1953 - SECTION 5A - DELEGATION OF POWER - EXCESSIVE DEL....
• India - Bombay High Court - Original Side,Bombay
/span> challanged ... style="position:absolute;white-space:pre;margin:0;padding:0;top:491pt;left:282pt">constitutional validity ... style="position:absolute;white-space:pre;margin:0;padding:0;top:635pt;left:370pt">constitutional validity ... /span> ground ... ground
1994 0 Supreme(MP) 822 • India - Madhya Pradesh
D.K.JAIN, M.S.A.SIDDIQUI, A.K.MATHUR
Section 94 (1) (2) (7) of the Municipalities Act, 1961 were challanged earlier before this Court and this Court set aside the order of transfer issued in purported exercise of the power under section 94 (7). In Shankar Lal v. State of M.P. ... Then it examined the validity of this provisions vis-a-vis of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution and its validity therefore was also affirmed. In Dr. ... Sub-section (5) and (6) of section 58 of the M.P. ... A reference has ....
2025 Supreme(Online)(RAJ) 4415 • India - High Court of Rajasthan (Jodhpur Bench)
BIRENDRA KUMAR
(8) Whether the judgment and decree challanged under appeal is vitiated on account of non-reading and misreading of material evidence? ... (9) Whether the judgment and decree challanged under appeal is vitiated on account of non-reading and misreading of pleading of plaintiff? ... (10) Whether the judgment and decree challanged under appeal is vitiated on account of non- consideration of relevant and material documentary evidence? ... The questions of law asserted as substantial questi....
2025 Supreme(Online)(RAJ) 7331 • India - High Court of Rajasthan (Jodhpur Bench)
BIRENDRA KUMAR
(8) Whether the judgment and decree challanged under appeal is vitiated on account of non-reading and misreading of material evidence? ... (9) Whether the judgment and decree challanged under appeal is vitiated on account of non-reading and misreading of pleading of plaintiff? ... (10) Whether the judgment and decree challanged under appeal is vitiated on account of non- consideration of relevant and material documentary evidence? ... The questions of law asserted as substantial questi....
2006 Supreme(Online)(HP) 9 • India - Himachal Pradesh High Court
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J
Sub-section (2) of Section 190 of the Act.7. ... He was challanged and produced before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Shimla on the spot. The learned Chief Judicial Magistrate imposed a penalty of Rs. 400/- upon the petitioner. ... The case of the petitioner is that he was challanged without following the procedure as provided under Chapter V of the Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 . ... As the petitioner was not carrying valid "Pollution under Control" Certificate, he was rightly challanged#HL_END....
Filter by Legal Phrase
