Cheating by Impersonation - Several cases and legal provisions address cheating through impersonation in examinations, primarily under Sections 419 (cheating by personation), 420 (cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property), and 120-B (criminal conspiracy) of the IPC Hemdutt Mourya VS State of M. P. - Madhya Pradesh, SMT ARPITHA U R Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA - Karnataka, ANIL KUMAR vs UT OF CHANDIGARH - Punjab and Haryana, Satish vs Directorate of Education (Through its Director) - Central Administrative Tribunal.
Legal Framework - Section 3/4 of the Madhya Pradesh Examination Act criminalizes impersonation in exams, and courts have invoked IPC sections to prosecute such offenses Hemdutt Mourya VS State of M. P. - Madhya Pradesh. The Indian Penal Code explicitly penalizes impersonation (Section 419) and cheating (Section 420).
Cases and Penalties - Courts have convicted individuals involved in impersonation, leading to punishments under Sections 419 and 420 IPC. In some instances, accused persons were acquitted or their sentences reduced upon appeal or due to lack of sufficient evidence SMT ARPITHA U R Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA - Karnataka, ANIL KUMAR vs UT OF CHANDIGARH - Punjab and Haryana.
Disqualification and Administrative Actions - Candidates found guilty of impersonation face disqualification from exams and employment, though some legal provisions like Section 12 of the Probation of Offenders Act may allow for removal of disqualification after certain periods Manjeet vs Directorate of Education - Central Administrative Tribunal.
Investigation and Evidence - FIRs and supplementary charge sheets document arrests and investigations into impersonation cases, often involving multiple accused and detailed evidence of cheating and forgery Anish Kumar VS State - Madras, Satish vs Directorate of Education (Through its Director) - Central Administrative Tribunal.
Main Points and Insights:
Analysis and Conclusion:
Cheating by impersonation remains a critical issue in examination systems, with robust legal provisions and active judicial enforcement to deter such offenses. The combination of statutory laws, judicial rulings, and administrative measures aims to uphold the integrity of examinations and prevent impersonation frauds.
References:
- Hemdutt Mourya VS State of M. P. - Madhya Pradesh
- SMT ARPITHA U R Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA - Karnataka
- ANIL KUMAR vs UT OF CHANDIGARH - Punjab and Haryana
- Manjeet vs Directorate of Education - Central Administrative Tribunal
- Anish Kumar VS State - Madras
The court also referred to Section 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 201, 120-B IPC, which deal with offenses related to cheating, forgery ... The court referred to Section 3/4 of the Madhya Pradesh Examination Act, which deals with offenses related to impersonation in examinations ... Impersonation in obtaining admission to the M.B.B.S. ... Course in the year 2010 used unfair means and got admission through impersonation for which an offence is registered against him forming ....
(A) Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Section 19 - Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 - Section 12 -Rejection of candidature for ... ) ... ... Facts of the case: ... The applicant's candidature for TGT position was rejected based on previous conviction for impersonation ... post of teacher due to previous conviction - Court holds that Section 12 removes disqualification but does not prevent an assessment ... The applicant was named in FIR No. 815/2012 under Sections 419, 420, and 1....
CRIMINAL - IMPERSONATION - SECTION 482 CR.P.C., SECTION 173(8) CR.P.C., SECTIONS 120-B, 419, 420 IPC - The ... and cheating. ... , and Section 173(8) which allows for further investigation. ... and cheating and Supplementary Charge Sheet was filed against A1 and A2 for the offences punishable under Sections 120-B read with 419 and 420 IPC and substantive offence under Section 420 IPC for A1 and #H....
(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 419, 420, 120B - Rajasthan Public Examination (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 1992 - Sections ... 4, 5, 6 - Information Technology Act, 2008 - Section 66D - Bail applications concerning multiple accused involved in examination ... fraud - Allegations of impersonation and leakage of question papers - The court considered the gravity of allegations and evidence ... Counsel also submitted that no offence of cheating or forgery is made out against t....
As regards the order dated 18.05.2011 extending the probation period of the applicant, we do not think it is necessary for us to interfere in the same as the person who has been found involved in a case of cheating and impersonation definitely has to be kept under observation for a longer period till ... However, during the probation period, he was arrested in FIR No. 35/2010 under Sections 419/420 IPC, on the allegation of facilitating impersonation in a Delhi Transport Corporation (DTC) examination co....
419 deals with punishment for cheating by impersonation, Section 420 for cheating and Section 109 for abetment of such offence. ... 419, 420, 109 read with Section 34 of the IPC. ... The allegation against the petitioner and others is for offences punishable under Sections 419, 420 and 109 of the IPC. ... For recording a finding on the offence alleged against the petitioner under Sections#HL....
It was learnt that he was involved in a case of cheating and impersonation and was arrested by the special team of Crime Branch. Information regarding his arrest was received by the school on 28.04.2010 but no information was received from the applicant during the arrest period. ... As regards the order dated 18.05.2011 extending the probation period of the applicant, we do not think it is necessary for us to interfere in the same as the person who has been found involved in a case of cheating and impersonation definitel....
It was learnt that he was involved in a case of cheating and impersonation and was arrested by the special team of Crime Branch. ... The respondents state that an FIR No.35 dated 21.03.2010 under Section 419/ 420/ 120-B of IPC was registered at PS Crime Branch according to which applicant and one Shri Yogesh were arrested for helping one of the candidates namely Shri to be kept under observation for a longer period till he is cleared of the allegation against him. ... As regards the order dated 18.05.2011 ....
419 of the Indian Penal Code (in short 'IPC') i.e. cheating by impersonation and acquitted both of them under Section 420 IPC IPC was upheld and the sentence awarded to the petitioner was reduced On receiving the complaint, an FIR under Section 419 and convicted them under Section 419 IPC and sentenced them to undergo p style="position:absolute;white-space:pre;margin:
Bharat Singh and unknown others under section 120-B r/w 419, 420, 467, 468 & 471 of IPC., and entrusted to Sh. ... The above acts prima-facie reveal commission of offences under section 120-B r/w 419, 420, 467, 468 & 471 conducted on 17.07.2022 thereby cheating the NTA, genuine impersonation of candidates in these examinations some p style="position:absolute;white-space:pre;margin:0
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.