AI Overview

AI Overview...

#CounterClaim, #CPCOrder8, #CoDefendant

Counter Claim Between Co-Defendants: Is It Legally Permissible?


In civil litigation, defendants often seek to assert their own claims through a counter claim to avoid multiple proceedings and promote judicial efficiency. But what happens when a defendant wants to file a counter claim between co-defendants? This question frequently arises in property disputes, partition suits, and commercial matters. Under Order VIII Rule 6A of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908, counter claims are designed to counter the plaintiff's suit. However, courts have consistently ruled that they cannot typically be directed solely against co-defendants.


This blog post breaks down the legal position, drawing from key judicial precedents. We'll examine why such counter claims are generally not maintainable, explore exceptions, and provide practical guidance. Note: This is general information based on case law and not specific legal advice. Consult a lawyer for your case.


Understanding Counter Claims Under CPC Order VIII Rule 6A


Order VIII Rule 6A allows a defendant to set up a counter claim against the plaintiff's claim in addition to a set-off. Key provisions include:



  • Rule 6A(1): A defendant in a suit may... set up, by way of counter-claim against the claim of the plaintiff, any right or claim... GIAN SINGH VS STATE OF PUNJAB - 2012 7 Supreme 1

  • Rule 6A(4): The counter claim is treated as a cross-suit or plaint, governed by rules applicable to plaints.

  • Rule 6C: The plaintiff may apply for exclusion of the counter claim before issues are framed if it ought to form a separate suit.


The legislative intent is to avoid multiplicity of proceedings by adjudicating related claims in one trial. However, the language explicitly ties counter claims to the plaintiff's claim, not disputes between defendants. Soma Devi VS Kashmiri Lal - 2017 Supreme(P&H) 2169


Why Counter Claims Against Co-Defendants Are Problematic


Courts have repeatedly held that counter claims between co-defendants are not maintainable for several reasons:



In partition suits and property disputes, this issue is common. For instance, one defendant cannot counter claim solely against another for title or possession without implicating the plaintiff. Karunakar Panda vs Nityananda Panda - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 1036


Key Judicial Precedents on Counter Claim Between Co-Defendants


Indian courts, especially the Supreme Court and High Courts, have clarified this position through landmark rulings:


Supreme Court and High Court Rulings Against Maintainability



Exceptions: When It May Be Allowed


While the general rule prohibits it, exceptions exist if the counter claim intertwines with the plaintiff's suit:



However, even in these scenarios, courts scrutinize to ensure no prejudice to parties. Late filings after issues are framed are typically rejected. Vijaymala Sidling Doijad vs State Of Maharashtra - 2025 Supreme(Bom) 636


| Scenario | Maintainable? | Key Reason |
|----------|---------------|------------|
| Solely against co-defendant | No | Violates Order VIII Rule 6A scheme Soma Devi VS Kashmiri Lal - 2017 Supreme(P&H) 2169 |
| Includes plaintiff | Possibly | Avoids multiplicity Lingaraj Saraf VS Akhaya Kumar Saraf - 2007 Supreme(Ori) 446 |
| Post-issues filing | Rarely | Causes delay/prejudice Vijaymala Sidling Doijad vs State Of Maharashtra - 2025 Supreme(Bom) 636 |
| Partition suit | No (if only co-defendants) | Natural justice violation KARUNAKAR PANDA vs NITYANANDA PANDA - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 2012 |


Practical Implications in Common Suits


Property and Partition Suits


In partition suits, all parties have interchangeable roles. A counter claim solely against a co-defendant without notifying others violates natural justice. Ex parte decrees on such claims are set aside. KARUNAKAR PANDA vs NITYANANDA PANDA - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 2012 Failure to serve notice to co-defendant renders an ex parte decree liable to be set aside.


Specific Performance and Recovery Suits


Defendants cannot use counter claims for specific performance against co-defendants; they must file separate suits. Relief of specific performance cannot be set up by way of a counter-claim since same is not directed against appellant/plaintiff. Rajul Manoj Shah Alias Rajeshwari Rasiklal Sheth VS Kiranbhai Shakrabhai Patel - 2025 8 Supreme 288


Disciplinary and Service Matters


Analogous principles apply: Procedural violations in enquiries require proof of prejudice for vitiation, but counter claims must still follow CPC. State Bank Of Patiala VS S. K. Sharma - 1996 3 Supreme 511


What Should Defendants Do Instead?


If a counter claim against a co-defendant is rejected:



  1. File a Separate Suit: The safest option, preserving all rights.

  2. Seek Exclusion Under Rule 6C: Plaintiff can apply; courts often grant liberty for fresh suits.

  3. Amend Written Statement: Raise defenses, but not as counter claims.

  4. Implead Properly: Use Order I Rule 10 only for necessary parties in the main suit.


Defendants should act promptly to avoid limitation issues. Courts favor amendments before evidence, but not during arguments. Pramod Kumar VS Vijay Kumar Sah - 2005 Supreme(Pat) 649


Key Takeaways



  • Generally Not Permissible: Counter claims between co-defendants are not maintainable under CPC unless linked to the plaintiff's claim. Soma Devi VS Kashmiri Lal - 2017 Supreme(P&H) 2169

  • Procedural Focus: Lack of response mechanisms for co-defendants makes it untenable.

  • Exceptions Rare: Only if it promotes efficiency without prejudice.

  • Judicial Trend: Courts prioritize statutory language to prevent abuse.


In summary, while CPC aims for efficient justice, counter claim between co-defendants remains largely impermissible to uphold procedural integrity. For tailored advice, consult a civil litigation expert, as outcomes depend on specific facts.


Disclaimer: This post summarizes case law for educational purposes. Legal outcomes vary by jurisdiction and facts. Seek professional advice.


GIAN SINGH VS STATE OF PUNJAB - 2012 7 Supreme 1 Rajul Manoj Shah Alias Rajeshwari Rasiklal Sheth VS Kiranbhai Shakrabhai Patel - 2025 8 Supreme 288 Soma Devi VS Kashmiri Lal - 2017 Supreme(P&H) 2169 Basanta Behera VS Menakabala Behera Sanjay Tiwari VS Yugal Kishore Prasad Sao - 2025 8 Supreme 574 Karunakar Panda vs Nityananda Panda - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 1036 KARUNAKAR PANDA vs NITYANANDA PANDA - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 2012 Vijaymala Sidling Doijad vs State Of Maharashtra - 2025 Supreme(Bom) 636

Search Results for "Counter Claim Between Co Defendants: Legal Validity?"

GIAN SINGH VS STATE OF PUNJAB - 2012 7 Supreme 1

2012 7 Supreme 1 India - Supreme Court

R.M.LODHA, SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, ANIL R.DAVE

Procedure, 1973 - Section 320 - Compoundable offences - Abatement or attempt to commit such offences u/s ... align="justify">Result: ... B.S. ... hereby withdraw all the allegations and counter-allegations made against each other”. ... The suit was compromised upon the defendants agreeing to pay the amounts due as per the schedule mentioned in the consent terms. ... ), attempt to murder (S.307), rape (S.376), trespassing (S.452) and kidnapping (S.364....

Mohinder Singh Gill VS Chief Election Commissioner, New Delhi - 1977 Supreme(SC) 350

1977 0 Supreme(SC) 350 India - Supreme Court

M. H. BEG, P. K. GOSWAMI, P. N. BHAGWATI, P. N. SHINGHAL, V. R. KRISHNA IYER

a body acting judicially, there must be a balance between the need for expedition and the need to give full opportunity to the defendant ... The deliverance of Dunkirk is part of the strategy of counter-attack. Wise or valid, is another matter. ... Fairness, however, does not necessarily require a plurality. of hearings or representations and counter-representations.

Tata Cellular VS Union Of India - 1994 Supreme(SC) 697

1994 0 Supreme(SC) 697 India - Supreme Court

M. N. VENKATACHALIAH, S. MOHAN, M. M. PUNCHHI

Kindly refer this office letter of even No informing you that M/s Tata Cellular Ltd were provisionally selected for franchise for ... Concerning rental, it was specifically averred in the counter before the High court that the other charges had also been included ... The counter-affidavit filed on behalf of the government of India does not mention that there was a delay by Apex Committee, as held ... The bill proceeds upon the theory that the bid upon which the defendants acted was not the complainant's bid; that the com....

Bachan Singh State Of Punjab And Mal Singh: Sunil Batra: Nathu Singh: Kartar Singh And Ujagar Singh: Sher Singh: Sunil Batra: Mal Singh: Nirpal Singh: Jagmohan Singh: Ujjagar Singh VS Union Of India: Union Of India: Union Of India: Delhi Administration: State Of Punjab: Delhi Administration: State Of Haryana: State Of Haryana: State Of Haryana: State Of Punjab - 1980 Supreme(SC) 279

1980 0 Supreme(SC) 279 India - Supreme Court

A. C. GUPTA, N. L. UNTWALIA, P. N. BHAGWATI, R. S. SARKARIA, Y. V. CHANDRACHUD

According to Kailasam, J., what is extracted above, runs directly counter to and cannot be reconciled with the following observations ... The defendant (accused) in that case was convicted of two counts of armed robbery and two counts of murder. ... Under the new Florida statutes, if a defendant (accused) is found guilty of first-degree murder, a separate pre-sentence hearing

Shalini Shyam Shetty VS Rajendra Shankar Patil - 2010 Supreme(SC) 609

2010 0 Supreme(SC) 609 India - Supreme Court

G.S.SINGHVI, ASOK KUMAR GANGULY

Writ Petition - Claim petition - Plaintiff the original defendant was the tenant in respect of Room - Respondent ... (o) An improper and a frequent exercise of this power will be counter-productive and will divest this ... occupation of the deceased defendant. ... The Appellate Court noticed that in the suit filed by the defendants against the plaintiff, the defendants have specifically come

Soma Devi VS Kashmiri Lal - 2017 Supreme(P&H) 2169

2017 0 Supreme(P&H) 2169 India - Punjab and Haryana

RAJBIR SEHRAWAT

-- Therefore, there is no question of a counter claim being permissible against a co-defendant by a defendant in the suit. ... Civil Procedure Code, 1908, O.8 R.6-A--Counter Claim--Counter claim against a co-defendant is not maintainable--Counter claim can ... a person required to suffer a counter#H....

Rajul Manoj Shah Alias Rajeshwari Rasiklal Sheth VS Kiranbhai Shakrabhai Patel - 2025 8 Supreme 288

2025 8 Supreme 288 India - Supreme Court

PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, JOYMALYA BAGCHI

No. 167 of 2012] filed by respondent No. 1/defendant No. 2 for amending written statement and for filing a counter claim in a suit ... is that counter-claim must lie within pecuniary jurisdiction of Court – Such a counter-claim is treated as a cross-suit and is governed ... No. 2 to file a counter-claim against defendant No. 1....

NIRMALA DEVI VS DHIAN SINGH - 2010 Supreme(HP) 363

2010 0 Supreme(HP) 363 India - Himachal Pradesh

KULDIP SINGH

Defendant No.3 filed a counter-claim against the plaintiff and other co-defendants, seeking joint ownership of the property based ... defendant No.3, stating that the counter-claim against co-defendants is maintainable and directed the defendant No.3 to file amended ... litigation and the absence of any bar in the Code for filing a co....

Pramod Kumar VS Vijay Kumar Sah - 2005 Supreme(Pat) 649

2005 0 Supreme(Pat) 649 India - Patna

S.N.HUSSAIN

may set up any counter claim against the claim of the plaintiff but no such right exists against the claim of a co-defendant- The ... Code of Civil Procedure, 1908-Order 8 Rule 6-A-Counter-claim by defendant-Suit for declaration of title, recovery of possession and ... arguments continuing-defendant seeking amendment raising counter-c....

K.  Sheela, W/o.  Babukuttan VS State Bank of Travancore - 2022 Supreme(Ker) 147

2022 0 Supreme(Ker) 147 India - Kerala

P.SOMARAJAN

third person, who was impleaded as counter claim defendant No.2 so that defendant can go for a suit against said counter claim defendant ... suit and counter claim and rendered a judgment and decree - It is under challenge by sole defendant in suit, who is counter claim ... . original plaintiff in s....

Ashok Kumar Sharma VS Rakesh Kumar Sharma - 2024 Supreme(P&H) 569

2024 0 Supreme(P&H) 569 India - Punjab and Haryana

ARCHANA PURI

In case defendant files a counter claim against a co-defendant then co-defendant has not been given any right to file written statement to the counter-claim under Order VIII Rule 6A. ... Further, Rule 6C gives entitlement to the plaintiff to raise an objection to the counter claim filed by the defendant before the issues are framed, in relation to the counter claim and the plaint....

Karunakar Panda vs Nityananda Panda - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 1036

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 1036 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA

For which, in the counter claim of the defendant No.2, the plaintiff was set ex parte.Therefore, the counter claim of the defendant No.2 was heard ex parte. The defendant No.2 adduced evidence from his side in his counter claim. ... The defendant No.2 objected to the CMA No.40 of 2018 stating that, he (defendant No.2) had filed his counter claim only against th....

Alankar Padaji Mhatre vs Namdeo Narayan Naik, Since deceased thr. Legal heirs.-A. Ramabai Namdeo Naik - 2026 Supreme(Bom) 40

2026 0 Supreme(Bom) 40 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

N. J. JAMADAR

the counter-claim against the plaintiff and the co-defendant. ... a counter- claim against the plaintiffs and Defendant No. 5, came to be allowed. ... nos. 1 to 4 to file the counter-claim against the plaintiffs and Defendant Nos. 1 to 4. ... Counter-claim by defendant. - (1) A defendant in a suit may, in addition to his right of pleading a set-off under rule 6,....

KARUNAKAR PANDA vs NITYANANDA PANDA - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 2012

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 2012 India - Orissa High Court

For which, in the counter claim of the defendant No.2, the plaintiff was set ex parte.Therefore, the counter claim of the defendant No.2 was heard ex parte. The defendant No.2 adduced evidence from his side in his counter claim. ... The defendant No.2 objected to the CMA No.40 of 2018 stating that, he (defendant No.2) had filed his counter claim only against th....

K.  Sheela, W/o.  Babukuttan VS State Bank of Travancore

2022 0 Supreme(Ker) 147 India - Kerala

P.SOMARAJAN

The defendant submitted her written statement by raising a counter claim by impleading the counter claim defendant No.1 and 2 and claimed that the counter claim 2nd defendant is bound to grant 30% of the loan amount as margin money. ... In fact, the trial court ought to have excluded the counter claim as it is against a third person, who was impleaded as counter claim#H....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

back ground Icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top