AI Overview...
-
Jaipur District and Sessions Court Transfer - The court transfers cases to the Chief Judicial Magistrate for further proceedings, indicating procedural handling within Jaipur's judicial system. Vikram Singh S/o Sh. Chhug Singh VS State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary Deptt. Of Home Govt. Of Raj. Jaipur - Rajasthan
-
Petitioner’s Status and Legal Challenge - The petitioner was not an accused in a property rights case, and the court found the acquittal of other accused persons did not implicate the petitioner. The challenge to an order dated 15.02.2023 in Criminal Revision No.33/2022 was dismissed, emphasizing the importance of proper procedural remedies. Umashankar Soni S/o Murari Prasad Soni vs State of Chhattisgarh - Chhattisgarh
-
Judicial Orders in Economic Offence Cases - The Chief Judicial Magistrate Jaipur Metro-II allowed a criminal miscellaneous petition, highlighting the court's role in economic offence trials and the procedural allowances for accused persons. P.C. Purohit Son Of Late Shri Shankarlal Purohit vs Union Of India, Through The Senior Intelligence Officer, Dggi, Jzu, Jaipur, (Uoi). - Rajasthan
-
Right to Speedy Trial - The courts recognize the fundamental right to a speedy trial under Article 21, with multiple cases emphasizing the importance of timely justice in Jaipur, ensuring that delays do not violate constitutional rights. Girdhar Singh Sodha S/o Khinv Singh Sodha vs State Of Rajasthan - Rajasthan
-
Approach to Revision and Filing Procedures - The High Court held that petitioners must file revision petitions under Section 397 Cr.P.C. before approaching the High Court directly. This underscores the necessity of following statutory remedies before invoking higher courts. RAMJI LAL MEENA SON OF SHRI BADRI PRASAD MEENA Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN - Rajasthan
-
Relief through Revision - The High Court allowed revision petitions, ordering the release of vehicles and other reliefs, demonstrating the court’s role in correcting judicial errors and ensuring justice in individual cases. RAJESH YADAV S/O VASUDEV YADAV Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN - Rajasthan
-
Suspension of Sentence and Criminal Convictions - The Rajasthan High Court suspended sentences in cases of cheating and dishonesty, considering factors like age and lack of prior criminal record, and sometimes allowed probation, reflecting judicial discretion in sentencing. DINESH KUMAR S/O SH. ANANDI LAL SHARMA Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN - Rajasthan
-
Summoning and Trial Procedures - The court emphasized that summoning accused involves serious legal considerations, especially in cases involving multiple transactions, and reiterated that criminal law proceedings must follow proper procedural norms. Dinesh Pratap Singh VS Directorate of Enforcement, Government of India - Uttarakhand
-
Long Trial Durations and Sentencing - A case where trial faced over 33 years, but the conviction was maintained with modified sentences, highlights procedural delays and judicial discretion in balancing justice with practical considerations. Banwari VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan
-
Criminal Antecedents and Rarest of Rare Cases - The court noted the absence of criminal antecedents and classified some offences as 'Rarest of Rare,' influencing the severity of sentences and the approach towards rehabilitation and justice. In reference of State of Chhattisgarh, Through Station House Officer VS Dolalal - Chhattisgarh
Analysis and Conclusion:
The sources collectively illustrate the procedural nuances and judicial discretion prevalent in Jaipur’s criminal justice system. Key themes include the importance of following statutory remedies (e.g., filing revision petitions), the courts’ recognition of constitutional rights such as the right to a speedy trial, and the flexibility in sentencing, especially for first-time offenders or those with no prior criminal record. Cases also reflect the courts' efforts to ensure justice through proper procedural conduct, timely interventions, and appropriate relief measures. Overall, Jaipur’s judiciary emphasizes procedural correctness, constitutional rights, and individualized sentencing considerations in criminal revisions and trials.
Search Results for "Criminal Revision 62 2022 Jaipur"
2024 0 Supreme(Raj) 1005 • India - Rajasthan
FARJAND ALI
The District and Sessions Court, Jaipur, will then transfer it to the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jaipur, District, for further trial. ... The District and Sessions Court, Jaipur, will then transfer it to the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jaipur, District, for further trial. ... The District and Sessions Court, Jaipur, will then transfer it to the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jaipur, District, for further trial. ... The District and Sessions Court, Jaipur....
2025 0 Supreme(Chh) 103 • India - High Court of Chhattisgarh
Arvind Kumar Verma
order as the petitioner was not an accused in the criminal case and the accused were acquitted, violating property rights under ... (Paras 1, 6, 8) ... ... (B) Legal principles - The judgment in a criminal trial ... ... ... Findings of Court: ... The court found that the petitioner was not an accused and the acquittal of the accused in the criminal ... Challenge in this petition is to the order dated 15.02.2023 (Annexure P-5) passed in Criminal Revision No.33/2022 by which learned ....
2025 0 Supreme(Raj) 1527 • India - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
GANESH RAM MEENA
Chief Judicial magistrate (Economic Offence), Jaipur Metro-II (for short, 'the trial Court') in Criminal Misc Case No. 06/2025 (Union of India Vs. M/s. ... Accordingly, the criminal misc. petition filed by the accused petitioner is allowed. The order dated 31.01.2025 passed by the Court of learned Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Economic Offence), Jaipur Metro-II in Criminal Misc Case No. 06/2025 (Union of India Vs. M/s. ... Criminal Revision Petition No. 273/2019) d....
2025 0 Supreme(Raj) 2160 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
FARJAND ALI
highlighted the fundamental right to a speedy trial as enshrined under Article 21, asserting that the right extends throughout the criminal ... JaipurAug-2023Jaipur Metro2.87/2020Jothwada, Jaipur30192/2021CMM ACMM, Jaipur Metro3.546/2019Bajaj Nagar, Jaipur16150/2021CMM ACMM MM, Jaipur Metro4. ... 602/2019Bajaj Nagar, Jaipur16715/2021CMM ACMM MM, Jaipur Metro5.702/2019Bajaj Nagar, Jaipur16718/2021CMM ACMM MM, #HL_ST....
• India - High Court Of Rajasthan
Issues: Whether the petitioner could directly approach the High Court without first filing a revision petition. ... Finding of the Court: The court held that the petitioner should have filed a revision petition under Section 397 Cr.P.C ... Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 10729/2022 Ramji Lal Meena Son Of Shri Badri Prasad Meena, Aged About 62 Years, Resident Of A-5, Shaheed Colony, Model Town Malviya Nagar, Jaipur. ... Without availing statutory remedy of filing #HL_S....
• India - High Court Of Rajasthan
MANOJ KUMAR VYAS
Finding of the Court: The High Court allowed the revision petition and directed the release of the vehicle to the petitioner ... Criminal Revision Petition No. 993/2021 Rajesh Yadav S/o Vasudev Yadav, Resident Of Plot No. 10, Behind Laxmi Dharam Kanta Jaipur Through Power Of Attorney Holder Deepak Kumar Yadav S/o Godaram Yadav Age 33 Years In these circumstances, this criminal revision petition deserves to be allowed and is accordingly allowed. ... JUSTIC....
• India - High Court Of Rajasthan
FARJAND ALI
CRIMINAL LAW - SUSPENSION OF SENTENCE - SECTION 389 CRPC - CHEATING - DISHONEST INTENTION - INDUCEMENT - CONVICTION Fact ... Criminal Revision Petition No. 1748/2022 Dinesh Kumar S/o Sh. Anandi Lal Sharma, R/o Plot No. B-109, Jhotwara, Jaipur (Raj.) ... HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence Application No.531/2022 In S.B. ... (FARJAND ALI),J AARZOO ARORA /62 ....
2023 0 Supreme(UK) 166 • India - Uttarakhand
RAVINDRA MAITHANI
(Paras 1-2, 4, 35, 40, 88-101) ... ... (B) Criminal Proceedings - Summoning - The court held that ... filed separately, based on distinct transactions and accused parties involved in each case - Returns, however, did not impair the criminal ... mandatory joint trial, particularly in cases of distinct financial crimes derived from separate transactions rather than a consolidated criminal ... Summoning of an accused in a criminal case is a serious matter. Criminal law cannot be set into motion as a matt....
2024 0 Supreme(Raj) 1254 • India - Rajasthan
GANESH RAM MEENA
He has faced trial for over 33 years and has no prior criminal record. ... the conviction but modified the sentence, allowing the appellant to be released on probation after considering his age, lack of criminal ... In the result, the Criminal Revision is allowed in part. The order of conviction passed by the trial court and confirmed by the lower appellate court is hereby maintained. ... The Coordinate Bench of this Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur in Criminal Appeal No. 368/1991; Bagdawat Ram and Ors.....
2022 0 Supreme(Chh) 149 • India - Chhattisgarh
SANJAY K.AGRAWAL, RAJANI DUBEY
There are no criminal antecedents. It is the first offence committed by the appellant. No doubt, a heinous one. The appellant is not a hardened criminal. ... After consideration of crime test and criminal test, it brings us to R-R test (Rarest of Rare). ... 62. Very recently, their Lordships of the Supreme Court in the matter of Bhagwani v. State of Madhya Pradesh, 2022 SCC OnLine SC 52, relying upon its earlier pronouncement in Bachan Singh (supra), Machhi Singh (supra), Mohd. ... Even though the appe....
Filter by Legal Phrase
