AI Overview

AI Overview...

Analysis and Conclusion:
Courts examining delays in filing MVOP applications or appeals consistently require applicants to establish bona fide reasons for such delays. While some delays are condoned if justified (e.g., medical reasons), excessive or unexplained delays are typically not accepted, affecting the likelihood of condonation. The primary focus remains on equitable justice—delays are scrutinized but do not automatically bar claims if sufficient cause is demonstrated. Ultimately, each case hinges on the merits of the explanation provided for the delay and the overall circumstances surrounding the claim.

Search Results for "Delay in Filing Mvop Stayed"

K.Pandu Ranga Swamy vs Bommani Hemalatha

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 11637 India - IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA, J

CPC and another application was filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act seeking to condone the delay of 756 days in filing the petition under Order 9, Rule 13 of a href="./.. ... District and Sessions Judge, at Jogulamba Gadwal in MVOP No.17 of 2018, dated 06.09.2022. 6. ... Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the petitioner herein has not deposited the full decreetal amount i..e, 12,61,000/-, as per the order passed in MVOP No.17 of 2018, dated 06.09.2022. ... 17.04.2025, on the ground that there is no pr....

Koppula Rajasekhar VS Aruna Sharma

2020 0 Supreme(Telangana) 864 India - Telangana

G.SRI DEVI

of 369 days in filing application for setting aside order passed - Petitioner herein filed MVOP No. under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles ... Motor Vehicles Act, 1983 - Section 166 - Seeking compensation - Injuries sustained by him in a road accident - Seeking to condone delay ... Learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the Court below ought to have allowed the application for condonation of delay in filing the set aside petition. ... He would further submit that the petitioner failed to sho....

THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED vs MAGAPU VENKATA LAKSHMI

India - Principlal Bench at Andhra Pradesh

days in filing the appeal. ... Issues: Whether the delay of 867 days in filing the appeal should be condoned? ... MOTOR ACCIDENT - DELAY IN FILING APPEAL - CONDONATION - SUFFICIENT CAUSE - [MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988] Fact of the Case: ... of 867 days in filing the appeal. ... It is clear that the appellant failed to show sufficient cause to condone the delay of 867 days in filing the appeal. ... Along with the appeal, the Insurance Company/ Appellant....

United India Insurance Company Limited VS Palusani Lakshmamma

2022 0 Supreme(AP) 504 India - Andhra Pradesh

U. DURGA PRASAD RAO, GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD

When the unrebutted salary particulars are available, that should be the basis for fixing his income in our considered view. So we accept his net salary for fixing the compensation under the head “loss of earnings”. The annual income of the deceased will be Rs.3,49,680/-(Rs.29,140 X 12). ... We are unable to accept this argument for the reason that PW3 though stated that generally the service of army persons will be 15 years, however he further stated one can continue in the service as per the army rules concerning the t....

Manne Srinivasa Rao VS Regalla Uma

2012 0 Supreme(AP) 159 India - Andhra Pradesh

R.KANTHA RAO

A) MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988, Section 166 –Where the delay in filing the ...   ... Here is a case, wherein the injured was examined as PW-1 and he had categorically stated in his deposition that on 30-6-2004 at about 03:00 p.m., while he was proceeding on the motor cycle bearing No. ... This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed challenging the award dated 06-05-1996 passed in MVOP.No. 1221 of 2004 by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Principal District Judge), Khammam. ... 3. ... His version is that in the accident....

Oriental Insurance Company Limited VS Magapu Venkata Lakshmi

2022 0 Supreme(AP) 21 India - Andhra Pradesh

BATTU DEVANAND

there is no sufficient cause for condonation of such a huge delay. ... Limitation Act – Section 5 – Motor vehicle accident – Claim of compensation - Condonation of delay of 1977 ... - Consideration for condonation of delay would not depend on status of party namely Government or public bodies so as to apply a ... In the affidavit filed along with I.A.No.1 of 2022, the reasons stated by the appellant at para No.5 for the delay occurred in filing the appeal as extracted hereunder: Para N....

Regional Manager VS Nilapala Nageswaramma

2022 0 Supreme(AP) 1416 India - Andhra Pradesh

BATTU DEVANAND

Nos. 57 and 71 of 2017 due to a delay of 730 and 873 days in filing the appeals. ... Nos. 57 and 71 of 2017 due to a delay of 730 and 873 days in filing the appeals. ... No. 1 of 2022 in both the appeals seeking to condone the delay of 730 days and 873 days in filing the appeals. ... Since there are two claim petitions arising out of the same accident, it took some time for the Management to take a decision for filing appeal. Thus there is a delay in....

Cholamandalam Ms General Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Vangapalli Shankaramma , Shankaravva

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 16754 India - IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO

b) The compensation awarded by the Tribunal i.e., Rs.6,52,000/- is enhanced to Rs.7,57,000/- together with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of filing the petition till realization. ... PW1 stated that they were in the hospital looking after her husband, after the death she lodged the complaint on 11.08.2018. In column No.8 of Ex.A1 it is mentioned that delay is due to treatment at hospital which is bona fide. 19. ... MV Act read with Rule 455 of A.P.Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989 claiming compensation of Rs.9,35,000/- agains....

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd, Kurnool vs Hazeera Bee

2025 0 Supreme(AP) 184 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

Dr. V.R.K.KRUPA SAGAR, J

(Paras 1-19) ... ... (B) Delay in FIR - Delay in lodging FIR not fatal to the claim; courts must ... consider reasons for delay and should not dismiss claims solely on this basis. ... ... ... Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the delay in FIR does not invalidate the claim, and the principles for just compensation ... Learned counsel further argued that even without filing an appeal or cross objections, the claimants are entitled to pray the court to award just compensation. ... The second petiti....

P. Saraswathi vs Samreddy Ram Reddy

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 16922 India - IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

B.R. MADHUSUDHAN RAO

Eyewitnesses' testimonies considered sufficient - Compensation awarded at Rs.14,94,000/- with 9% interest per annum from the date of filing ... b) The appellants are awarded compensation of Rs.14,94,000/- together with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of filing the petition till payment. ... In the evidence of RW1 he has given the name of K.Janardhan Reddy S/o.Madhusudhan Reddy, the said name is neither in Ex.A1 nor he is party in the MVOP. ... In the result, MACMA.No.114 of 2022 is allowed in part as under: a) The impu....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top