Manikandan Vathan Chettiar - Legal actions and representations involving him include petitions for court directives, allegations of misconduct, and advocacy in criminal and civil cases. He has sought court orders against judicial officers, requested investigations into fake courts, and represented clients in various proceedings. Notably, he filed a petition for constituting an SIT to probe judgments of alleged fake courts and has been involved in contempt and other judicial matters. Manikandan Vathan Chettiar VS Madras High Court - Madras, Lakshmi VS State of Tamilnadu - Madras, Manikandan Vathan Chettiar vs Madras High Court Thro'its Registrar (Vigilance) - Madras, Manikandan Vathan Chettiar vs The State of Tamil Nadu - Madras, Manikandan Vathan Chettiar VS Bar Council of Tamil Nadu - Madras, S. Vijayalakshmi VS Secretary to Government, Home Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - Madras, S. Vijayalakshmi VS Secretary to Government, Home Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - Madras, P. Jayasankar VS Chief Secretary to Government of Tamilnadu - Madras, Vijayalakshmi Shanmugam VS Chief Secretary - Madras
Conduct and Court Interactions - He has been accused of violating professional decorum, making improper references in affidavits, and entering appearances in cases where it was deemed inappropriate. His involvement in contempt actions and disputes with judicial authorities indicates a contentious relationship with some court processes. Manikandan Vathan Chettiar VS Madras High Court - Madras, Lakshmi VS State of Tamilnadu - Madras, Manikandan Vathan Chettiar VS Bar Council of Tamil Nadu - Madras, S. Vijayalakshmi VS Secretary to Government, Home Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - Madras, S. Vijayalakshmi VS Secretary to Government, Home Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - Madras
Advocacy and Legal Strategies - Manikandan Vathan Chettiar has actively participated in litigation, including seeking court intervention for disciplinary actions against court officials, and has appeared as a party-in-person in certain cases. He has also relied on specific legal arguments, such as the interpretation of words used by the Supreme Court, to support his cases. Manikandan Vathan Chettiar vs Madras High Court Thro'its Registrar (Vigilance) - Madras, Manikandan Vathan Chettiar vs The State of Tamil Nadu - Madras, Vijayalakshmi Shanmugam VS Chief Secretary - Madras
Main Insights - His legal activities span advocacy, petitions for judicial oversight, and allegations of misconduct, reflecting a complex engagement with the judicial system. His actions suggest a focus on judicial accountability and integrity, though they sometimes involve contentious interactions with court authorities. Various references
Analysis and Conclusion:
Manikandan Vathan Chettiar is a prominent legal figure involved in various judicial proceedings, including petitions for investigations, contempt actions, and advocacy for judicial accountability. His approach has sometimes been controversial, with allegations of misconduct and improper court behavior. His efforts highlight a persistent pursuit of judicial reforms and oversight, though his methods and interactions with court officials have occasionally led to disputes and criticisms.
Manikandan Vathan Chettiar and Ms.Kalyani, Advocates for violation of the aforesaid Rule by making Mr. A.L. ... Manikandan Vathan Chettiar for a direction to the Registrar General of this Court to take action against the Deputy Registrar, Criminal ... Manikandan Vathan Chettiar and Ms.Kalyani, Advocates have thrown to wind fundamental canons of decent behaviour towards colleagues ... Manikandan Vathan Chettiar and Ms.Kalyani, Advocates for violation ....
Manikandan Vathan Chettiar and Mr. ... Mathan Kumar for initiating criminal contempt action against them for interference with the course of justice is available before ... Manikandan Vathan Chettiar did not chose to appear and deputed Mr. R. ... Manikandan Vathan Chettiar in the open Court. ... Mr. Manikandan Vathan Chettiar appearing for Mr. Mathan Kumar submitted that this Court has no jurisdiction to call for e....
JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Crl.O.P.SR Nos.40547 and 40551 of 2025 Manikandan Vathan Chettiar ... Petitioner in both the Crl.O.Ps. ... : For the petitioner : Mr.Manikandan Vathan Chettiar Party-in-Person COMMON ORDER After hearing for some time, relating to maintainability, the Party-in- Person present before this Court would submit that he is
This petition is filed by Manikandan Vathan Chettiar with the following prayer: "Hence this plea for constitution of an SIT headed by a sitting/retired Judge of the Supreme Court to probe all the judgments of the Fake-Courts and the manner in which they were executed by the
Manikandan Vathan Chettiar – the Counsel for the Petitioner and the Police started making enquiries. ... 15. ... Manikandan Chettiar and his landlady and her father. When the Petitioner has made a reference to those litigations in the affidavit, it would not have been proper on the part of Mr. Manikandan Vathan Chettiar to enter appearance as a Counsel for the Petitioner. ... Manikandan Vathan Chettiar – the Counsel for the Petitioner had a Civil case filed against h....
Manikandan Vathan Chettiar – the Counsel for the Petitioner and the Police started making enquiries. ... 15. ... Manikandan Chettiar and his landlady and her father. When the Petitioner has made a reference to those litigations in the affidavit, it would not have been proper on the part of Mr. Manikandan Vathan Chettiar to enter appearance as a Counsel for the Petitioner. ... Manikandan Vathan Chettiar – the Counsel for the Petitioner had a Civil case filed against ....
Manikandan Vathan Chettiar, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks for a direction, wherein and by which this Court will have to take over the powers vested on the Commission in imposing appropriate penalties against the Public Information Officers.
The word ‘erased’ used by the Apex Court is heavily relied upon by Mr.Manikandan Vathan Chettiar to contend that it must be presumed to indict the learned Judge. ... Mr.Manikandan Vathan Chettiar, learned counsel for the petitioner in W.P.No.18277 of 2011 has reiterated the grounds raised in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition. ... (ii): It is the contention of Mr.Manikandan Vathan Chettiar that wrong address of the one-man commission was shown in the notification and t....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.