AI Overview...
-
Jaipur Development Authority (JDA) - Several legal cases and orders highlight issues related to deficiencies in services, unauthorized recoveries, and land allotment disputes. For instance, the District Commission confirmed findings against JDA for failure to fully address or appeal orders related to charges against it, including non-provision of amenities and unauthorized recoveries SAVITRI AGARWAL vs JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY - Consumer National.
-
Court Proceedings & Appeals - Multiple appeals and writ petitions involve disputes over land allotments, cancellations, and violations of lease terms. Notably, the Rajasthan High Court addressed violations of allotment conditions and procedural lapses, emphasizing the importance of adhering to legal frameworks M/S BALAJI BUILDERS JAIPUR vs RECOVERY OFFICER D R T JAIPUR AND ANOTHE - Rajasthan, Axis Trustee Services Ltd. VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan.
-
Land and Property Disputes - Several cases concern illegal land allotments, issuance of pattas, and recovery actions. Complaints include illegal issuance of pattas for land measuring 3.43 acres, with allegations of procedural irregularities and unauthorized approvals, leading to investigations and inquiries Shailendra Garg S/o late Sh. Bhim Sen Garg VS State of Rajasthan through P. P. - Rajasthan.
-
Administrative and Regulatory Compliance - Cases highlight procedural lapses such as failure to conduct proper inquiries before recovery orders, and delays in approval processes for construction permissions under the Jaipur Development Act, 1982. The Act’s provisions for deemed permissions and time-bound decisions are emphasized, with courts underscoring the need for timely action Sachhidanand Sharma VS Jaipur Development Authority (85) - Rajasthan.
-
Miscellaneous Legal Issues - Several cases involve disciplinary proceedings, employee appointments, and procedural violations under various statutes, including the Panchayat Samitis and Zila Parishads Act, and the Criminal Procedure Code, reflecting broader governance and administrative challenges faced by JDA D. C. Jain VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan, Jaipur Development Authority VS Smt. Pushpalata Rana - Rajasthan, Mahesh Goyal s/o Shri Prahlad Prasad Goyal VS State of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor - Rajasthan.
Analysis and Conclusion:
The legal landscape surrounding Jaipur Development Authority reveals recurring issues related to land management, procedural compliance, and service delivery. Courts have consistently emphasized adherence to legal procedures, timely decision-making, and accountability. The cases underscore the need for JDA to strengthen its administrative processes to prevent irregularities, ensure transparency, and uphold legal standards in land allotments, recoveries, and service provisions.
Search Results for "Recovery by Jaipur Development Authority"
2025 Supreme(Online)(NCDRC) 2939 • India - National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
A. P. SAHI, PRESIDENT, MR. BHARATKUMAR PANDYA, MEMBER
of charges against the Jaipur Development Authority - The District Commission's Orders were not fully addressed or appealed by the ... respondent, leading to findings against the Authority being confirmed. ... - Sections related to deficiency in service - Revision petitions regarding alleged non-provision of amenities and unauthorized recovery ... The letter dated 04.06.1997 is extracted herein under: JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, JAIPUR#HL....
• India - High Court of Rajasthan - High Court Bench at Jaipur
The Jaipur Development Authority, Pandit Ram Kishore Vyas Bhawan, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Jaipur through its HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ... Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 7563/2011 M/s Balaji Builders, S.B. 110, Lal Kothi, Tonk Road, Jaipur through its partner- Shri Vishnu Dutt Goyal S/o Late Shri Chouth Mal Goyal, by caste Mahajan, R/o 1/33, Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur
2025 Supreme(RAJ) 919 • India - High Court of Rajasthan (Jaipur Bench)
MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ, MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS, J
Facility, and traffic control measures in Jaipur. ... The court noted that the parking development project is underway and required updates on further projects. ... Taken Report - The court addressed the shortcomings in cleaning worker recruitment and the need for timely functional Material Recovery ... The Action Taken Report on five different areas of concern, as identified earlier in the action plan, has been given in detail by the Municipal Corporation Greater/Heritage, Jaipur, Traffic Police, Jaipur#HL_END....
2024 0 Supreme(Raj) 162 • India - Rajasthan
ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
SARFAESI Act - Land Allotment Dispute - Jaipur Development Authority Act, 1982 - [SARFAESI Act, 2002, Jaipur ... The Jaipur Development Authority cancelled the allotment, leading to appeals and writ petitions. ... Development Authority Act, 1982] - The court discussed the violation of terms and conditions of the allotment order and lease deed ... Development Authority; iv. ... To hold and to decla....
• India - Consumer
D.K.JAIN, M.SHREESHA
The projects were approved by the approving authority at Head Office level after confirmation of compliance of the guidelines of Bank on ADF/ APF schemes based on the confirmation/ recommendation from the then dealing official at RAC-Jaipur i.e. Analyst Retail Recovery, Jaipur namely Sh. ... The Bank after thorough investigation initiated departmental proceedings against the then dealing officials at RAC-Jaipur i.e. Analyst Retail Recovery, Jaipur namely sh. Mohit Mod....
1980 0 Supreme(Raj) 194 • India - Rajasthan
G.M.LODHA
PANCHAYAT SAMITIS AND ZILA PARISHADS ACT - SECTION 26, 88, 89 - CCA RULES - RULE 16, 17 - DISCIPLINARY APPEAL RULES - RULE 8 - RECOVERY ... An order was passed for recovery of the amount without conducting any enquiry or providing an opportunity to the petitioner to defend ... after holding an enquiry as contemplated by the Rules, On 21-1-71, a letter was addressed by the Deputy Commissioner, Development, Rajas than Jaipur to the Commissioner, Local Audit Funds, in which it was mentioned, inter alia that the order for #....
2008 0 Supreme(Raj) 1751 • India - Rajasthan
SHIV KUMAR SHARMA, GUMAN SINGH
- The respondent came to be appointed on the post of Librarian with effect from December 22, 1983 on a consolidated salary of Rs. 400/- per month on temporary basis after her due selection by the selection committee pursuant to the advertisement issued by the Jaipur Development Authority (JDA ... The order was served on the respondent on September 6, 1990 when she went to resume her duties after her recovery from typhoid. The respondent assailed the order dated July 30, 1990 by filing writ petition under Article 226 of ....
2016 0 Supreme(Raj) 1687 • India - Rajasthan
VIJAY KUMAR VYAS
On 9.5.2013, complainant Ram Saran submitted a written complaint to the Director General, Anti-Corruption Bureau, Rajasthan, Jaipur alleging, inter alia, that Jaipur Development Authority (JDA) issued a single patta in favour of M/s Ganpati Construction in illegal manner and the land ad-measuring 3.43 ... Due to approval and sanction made by the State Government on 6.4.2011, the petitioner was under an obligation to issue the Patta being Subordinate Officer and in view of the provisions of section 90(2) of the ....
1992 0 Supreme(Raj) 315 • India - Rajasthan
N.C.KOCHHAR, M.R.CALLA
Jaipur Development Act, 1982, Sec. 17 (3)—Deemed permission for construction-Application has to be considered within sixty days from ... the date of receipt—On not receiving any letter from the authority the said fact has to be bring to the notice of the Secretary ... of the Authority—Secretary has to take action thereon, but if no refusal is communicated to such an applicant within 30 days it will ... within the Jaipur Region of the type as the Authority may from time to time specify,....
2017 0 Supreme(Raj) 761 • India - Rajasthan
PRASHANT KUMAR AGARWAL
Criminal Procedure Code – Section 378 – Jaipur Development Authority Act, 1982 – Section 33 (2) – Acquittal ... Issue – Aggrieved with the judgment and order passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate No.1, Jaipur Development Authority ... 190 sq. yards (158.92 sq.meter) was allotted by the Jaipur Development Authority to one Smt. ... Development Authority or by a person expressly authori....
Filter by Legal Phrase
