AI Overview

AI Overview...

#RedeemablePreferenceShares, #CompanyLawIndia, #SEBIRegulations

Understanding Redeemable Preference Shares: A Comprehensive Legal Guide


Redeemable preference shares are a hybrid financial instrument popular among companies for raising capital without diluting equity control indefinitely. These shares carry preferential rights to dividends and capital repayment but come with a redemption feature, allowing the company to buy them back after a specified period. If you're a company director, investor, or shareholder grappling with redeemable preference shares, this guide breaks down the legal framework, redemption processes, regulatory oversight, and judicial insights based on Indian law. Note: This is general information, not legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your specific situation, as laws and facts vary.


What Are Redeemable Preference Shares?


Redeemable preference shares differ from ordinary preference shares by including a redemption clause. Holders receive fixed dividends and priority on capital repayment upon redemption, typically at face value or a premium. Under the Companies Act, 2013 (Section 55), companies must redeem these shares within 20 years from issuance, unless extended by the Tribunal.


Key features include:
- Preferential dividends: Fixed rate, often cumulative.
- Redemption timeline: Mandatory within 20 years, from profits or fresh share proceeds.
- Conversion options: Some are convertible to equity, blending debt and equity traits. (Hybrid securities - have some of the attributes of both debt securities and equity securities) SAHARA INDIA REAL ESTATE CORPORATION LIMITED VS SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA - 2012 6 Supreme 400


Failure to redeem doesn't automatically make holders creditors; they remain shareholders. (Holders of redeemable preference shares do not automatically become creditors of the company upon the company's failure to redeem the shares) LAKHAND SURANA VS HYDERABAD VANASPATHY Ltd. , MOULALI, HYDERABAD - 1988 Supreme(AP) 109


Legal Framework Governing Redemption


Companies Act, 2013 - Section 55


Section 55 mandates redemption from:
1. Profits available for dividends, or
2. Proceeds of a fresh share issue for redemption.


If unable due to losses, companies can issue fresh redeemable preference shares with 3/4th shareholder consent (in value). Upon issuance, original shares are deemed redeemed. Multiple NCLT rulings affirm this:
- Petitions approved for issuing new shares in lieu of unredeemed ones, ensuring compliance and shareholder consent. (The petition under Section 55 of the Companies Act, 2013 is approved to extend the tenure of Cumulative Redeemable Preference Shares) Nandi Infrastructure Corridor Enterprise Ltd vs ROC, Karnataka - 2025 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 3786
- Tribunal satisfied with financial position, consents, and statutory adherence. (Company allowed to issue redeemable preference shares for unpaid dividends) HOTEL QUEEN ROAD PRIVATE LIMITED. VS - 2023 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 2419


SEBI Regulations and Public Issues


SEBI oversees listed companies or those intending listing under Section 55A, Companies Act, 1956 (now aligned with 2013 Act). Optionally Fully Convertible Debentures (OFCDs) were ruled as securities requiring listing if offered publicly.


In Sahara cases, SEBI directed refunds for unlisted OFCDs sold to millions, deeming them public issues. (SEBI has jurisdiction... OFCDs issued by Saharas - Debentures in presenti and become shares in futuro) SAHARA INDIA REAL ESTATE CORPORATION LIMITED VS SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA - 2012 6 Supreme 400


Public issue thresholds: Over 49 persons triggers public offer rules (Section 67(3)). Non-listing mandates refunds with 15% interest. (Refund of the amount collected from the public with interest - Mandatory) SAHARA INDIA REAL ESTATE CORPORATION LIMITED VS SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA - 2012 6 Supreme 400


Redemption Process and Shareholder Rights


Redemption involves:
- Board resolution and notice.
- Funding from profits or new equity.
- Cancellation post-redemption.


Shareholders can't force winding up as creditors pre-redemption. (Redeemable preference shares can only be redeemed out of the company's profits or through a fresh issue of shares, which distinguishes them from ordinary creditors) LAKHAND SURANA VS HYDERABAD VANASPATHY Ltd. , MOULALI, HYDERABAD - 1988 Supreme(AP) 109


Transfer: Effective between parties but complete only on register entry. Transferee gains beneficial interest; transferor holds legal title as trustee. (However, on the transfer of shares, the transferee becomes the owner of the beneficial interest though the legal title continues with the transferor) Life Insurance Corporation Of India VS Escorts LTD. - 1985 Supreme(SC) 393


For extensions or reissues, NCLT approval needs:
- Special resolution with 75% consent.
- No prejudice to non-consenting holders.
- Compliance certificate. (On the issue of such further redeemable preference shares (NCRPS), the unredeemed preference shares shall be deemed to have been redeemed) PRIMA INDUSTRIES LIMITED VS REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES - 2026 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 432


Tax Implications of Redeemable Preference Shares


Income Tax


Redemption from capitalized profits may be deemed dividend distribution. (When redeemable preference shares are redeemed, the preference share capital is returned to the shareholders and since such return... entails release of assets) Shashibala Navnitlal VS Commissioner of Income Tax, Gujarat - 1964 Supreme(Guj) 132


Expenses for issuance (underwriting, brokerage) are capital, not deductible. (Expenditure incurred for the issue of redeemable preference shares is capital expenditure and not revenue expenditure) HINDUSTAN GAS AND INDUSTRIES LTD. VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX - 1978 Supreme(Cal) 527


Valuation for gifts/tax: Rule 10, Gift-tax Rules prioritizes asset-based over yield method if available. (If first method not available, second method to be resorted to) Commissioner Of Income-Tax VS Shah Bhavnani Chanabhai - 1997 Supreme(MP) 690


Under Section 56(2)(viib), fair market value (FMV) via Rule 11UA; expert reports upheld unless flawed. (Valuation methodology for redeemable preference shares must comply with prescribed rules) Revenue vs Assessee - 2024 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 3357


Dividend Rebates


Pre-1968, rebates on gross dividends under Sections 85A/80M, not net of expenses. (rebate of income-tax is admissible on the actual amount of dividend received) Cloth Traders Private LTD. : Commissioner Of Income Tax: H. K. Investment Private LTD. : C. V. Mehta Private LTD. : Distributors Baroda Private LTD. VS Additional C. I. T. , Gujarat-i: H. K. Investment Private LTD. : Commissioner Of Income Tax Gujarat-iii: Commissioner Of Income Tax Gujarat-iii: Commissioner Of Income Tax Gujarat-iv - 1979 Supreme(SC) 299


Judicial Interpretations and Key Cases



Courts emphasize clean hands; non-compliance invites strict enforcement. (Those who seek relief from a court must come with clean hands) SAHARA INDIA REAL ESTATE CORPORATION LIMITED VS SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA - 2012 6 Supreme 400


Recent NCLT Trends


NCLT routinely approves reissues/extensions:
- 15-year extensions for cumulative shares. Nandi Infrastructure Corridor Enterprise Ltd vs ROC, Karnataka - 2025 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 3786
- New non-cumulative shares for student housing firm. INDO-AMERICAN HYBRID SEEDS (INDIA)PRIVATE LIMITED VS - 2025 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 12
- HSBC-related 9% shares reissued post-20 years. HSBC Securities and Capital Markets India Private Limited VS - 2023 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 409


Minority can't oppose if 75% consent obtained. HOTEL QUEEN ROAD PRIVATE LIMITED. VS - 2023 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 2419


Key Takeaways for Companies and Investors



  • Companies: Plan redemptions meticulously; seek NCLT for extensions. Ensure SEBI compliance for public-ish offers.

  • Investors: Beneficial interest transfers promptly; monitor redemption funds.

  • Risks: Tax on deemed dividends; no creditor priority.

  • Best Practice: Obtain valuations, consents, and list if public.


In summary, redeemable preference shares offer flexibility but demand strict adherence to timelines and consents. Recent rulings prioritize investor protection and regulatory compliance. For tailored advice, engage legal experts.


This article draws from judicial precedents and statutes as of latest available data. Laws evolve; verify current position.

Search Results for "Redeemable Preference Shares: Legal Guide & Rules"

Life Insurance Corporation Of India VS Escorts LTD.  - 1985 Supreme(SC) 393

1985 0 Supreme(SC) 393 India - Supreme Court

E.S.VENKATARAMIAH, O.CHHINNAPPA REDDY, R.B.MISRA, V.BALAKRISHNA ERADI, V.KHALID

. - COST OF WRIT PETITION - - LIFTING THE VEIL IS PERMISSIBLE WHERE THE STATUTE ITSELF CONTEMPLATES- TRANSFER OF SHARES—TRANSFEROR ... However, on the transfer of shares, the transferee becomes the owner of the beneficial interest though the legal title continues ... in the register alone is entitled to receive the dividends, notwithstanding that he has already parted with his interest in the shares ... The proposal, as it finally emerged from Escorts Limited, was to issue debentures 17,50,000 Secured Redeemable Debentu....

Rohtas Industries VS S. D. Agarwal - 1968 Supreme(SC) 384

1968 0 Supreme(SC) 384 India - Supreme Court

S.M.SIKRI, K.S.HEGDE, R.S.BACHAWAT

of Rs. 10/- and 5000 51/2 per cent cumulative redeemable preference shares of Rs. 100/-. 2000 preference shares were held by New ... The preference shares were redeemable at the option of the Albion Plywoods Ltd., at any time after 10 years from the date of their ... of the preference shares into ordinary shares.

IDBI TRUSTEESHIP SERVICES LTD.  VS HUBTOWN LTD.  - 2016 8 Supreme 194

2016 8 Supreme 194 India - Supreme Court

KURIAN JOSEPH, ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN

As a result of the said investment, FMO currently holds (i) 10% of the equity of Vinca through Class A shares and is entitled to ... Upon conversion, the 3 CCDs in Vinca will entitle FMO to 99% of the equity of Vinca (by allotment of additional Class A shares), ... Further, as on date, the Defendant owns 49% of the equity of Vinca through Class A shares and is entitled to 49% of the voting rights ... instruments (i.e. in the form of equity capital or compulsorily and ....

Subrata Roy Sahara VS Union of India - 2014 4 Supreme 129

2014 4 Supreme 129 India - Supreme Court

K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR

refunded amounts to investors in cash – Contrary to SEBI directive – No details furnished – Only Rs.351 crores worth of debentures redeemable ... The companies were also directed, not to offer their equity shares/OFCDs or any other securities, to the public and/or invite subscription ... shares arising out of conversion of such OFCDs. ... The companies also confirmed in their above affidavits, that the total amount which would become redeemable, towards the end of the

R. K. Dalmia VS Delhi Administration - 1962 Supreme(SC) 134

1962 0 Supreme(SC) 134 India - Supreme Court

K.SUBBA RAO, RAGHUBAR DAYAL, S.R.DASS

granted were maturing in September and were redeemable at Bombay. ... accord because those securities were redeemable at Bombay and the maturity date was approaching. ... Reference is made to the statement of Jayantilal, P.W. 6, a partner of the Firm Devkaran Nanjee, Brokers in Shares and securities

HINDUSTAN GAS AND INDUSTRIES LTD.  VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX - 1978 Supreme(Cal) 527

1978 0 Supreme(Cal) 527 India - Calcutta

DIPAK KUMAR SEN, C.K.BANERJEE

INCOME TAX - Expenditure incurred for issue of redeemable preference shares - Whether revenue or capital expenditure - Held, capital ... Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the expenditure incurred by the assessee for the issue of redeemable preference shares ... Issues: Whether the expenditure incurred by the assessee for the issue of redeemable preference shares was revenue or capital ... It was further contended that the said ....

HOTEL QUEEN ROAD PRIVATE LIMITED.    VS - 2023 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 2419

2023 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 2419 India - National Company Law Tribunal

DR. BINOD KUMAR SINHA, MEMBER (TECHNICAL), BACHU VENKAT BALARAM DAS, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)

request for reissue of shares - Company allowed to issue redeemable preference shares for unpaid dividends. ... (A) Companies Act, 2013 - Section 55(1), 55(2), 55(3) - Application for consent to issue fresh redeemable preference shares - Company ... in company petitions - Court ruled minority shareholders have no standing to oppose validly consented preference shares reissue ... preference shares ....

Shashibala Navnitlal VS Commissioner of Income Tax, Gujarat - 1964 Supreme(Guj) 132

1964 0 Supreme(Guj) 132 India - Gujarat

J.M.SHELAT, P.N.BHAGWATI

When redeemable preference shares are redeemed, the preference share capital is returned to the shareholders and since such return ... Ratio Decidendi: When accumulated profits are capitalised and redeemable preference shares are issued as bonus shares credited ... INCOME TAX - Dividend - Distribution of accumulated profits - Whether redemption of redeemable preference shares is....

Nandi Infrastructure Corridor Enterprise Ltd vs ROC, Karnataka - 2025 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 3786

2025 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 3786 India - National Company Law Tribunal

SHRI. SUNIL KUMAR AGGARWAL, SHRI. RADHAKRISHNA SREEPADA, JJ

The petition under Section 55 of the Companies Act, 2013 is approved to extend the tenure of Cumulative Redeemable Preference Shares ... The tribunal upheld that the preference shares can be redeemed according to statutory guidelines. ... by 15 years from the date of maturity of the Cumulative Redeemable Preference Shares, thus the total tenure being 30 years. ... maturity on the same terms as that of existing Cumulative Redeemable ....

North Eastern Educare & Research Private Limited vs Registrar of Companies, NER - 2025 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 3165

2025 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 3165 India - National Company Law Tribunal

Yogendra Kumar Singh, Member (Technical), Rammurti Kushawaha, Member (Judicial)

for approval to issue fresh redeemable preference shares. ... ... ... Result: Petition allowed for issuance of new redeemable preference shares. ... (A) Companies Act, 2013 - Section 55(3) - Issuance of redeemable preference shares in lieu of unredeemed shares - Petition filed ... preference shares in lieu of the existing unredeemed preference shares....

PRIMA INDUSTRIES LIMITED VS REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES - 2026 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 432

2026 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 432 India - National Company Law Tribunal

behalf, issue further redeemable preference shares equal to the amount due, including the dividend thereon, in respect of the unredeemed preference shares, and on the issue of such further redeemable preference shares, the unredeemed preference shares shall be deemed to have been redeemed: p class ... On the issue of further redeemable preference shares (NCRPS),....

North Eastern Educare & Research Private Limited vs Registrar of Companies, NER

2025 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 3165 India - National Company Law Tribunal

Yogendra Kumar Singh, Member (Technical), Rammurti Kushawaha, Member (Judicial)

Subsequently, this instant petition has been filed by the petitioner for issuance and allotment of fresh redeemable preference shares in lieu of the existing unredeemed preference shares of 3,00,000 (Three Lacs) Zero% Redeemable Convertible Preference shares ... Preference Shares of the Company in lieu of existing Unredeemed Preference Shares originally issued on 30.03.2015. .......

SUDHANSU SHEKHAR PATI vs SECURTIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA MUMBAI - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 437

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 437 India - Orissa High Court

Seashore Securities Limited was found, upon investigation, to have issued Redeemable Preference Shares to the public in violation of the statutory framework governing public issues of securities. ... The record further discloses that the petitioner was a Director of the company during a part of the period when the illegal issuance of Redeemable Preference Shares is alleged to have taken place. ... Rajiv Khurana2 (vi) The petitioner submitted that in the absence of any specific role at....

K.  K.  Jindal VS Rajaram Corn Products (PB) (P. ) Ltd.

India - Company Law Board

DHAN RAJ

redeemable preference shares were issued in lieu of the previously existing redeemable preference shares. ... the existing 19,000 redeemable preference shares which included 5,000 redeemable preference shares of the petitioners herein. ... According to section 80A, if a company issues further redeemable preference shares in re....

HSBC Securities and Capital Markets India Private Limited  VS - 2023 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 409

2023 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 409 India - National Company Law Tribunal

persons who have not consented to the issue of further redeemable preference shares”. ... 9% Redeemable Preference Shares due for redemption on 12 March 2021. ... lieu of old 25,00,000 9% Redeemable Preference Shares on the same terms and conditions drawn in the past. ... The Petitioner Company had allotted 9% 25,00,000 Redeemable Preference Shares on 12 March 2001 to HSBC Invest....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

back ground Icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top