AI Overview

AI Overview...

#InterviewRelaxation,#CourtExemption,#LegalAppearance

Understanding Relaxation for Appearing in Interviews Already Held


In legal contexts like court proceedings, job recruitments, and educational admissions, requests for relaxation for appearing interview held often arise due to unforeseen circumstances such as illness, family emergencies, or procedural issues. Courts and authorities frequently grapple with balancing strict procedural rules against principles of natural justice and equity. This post examines key judicial precedents and guidelines, drawing from Supreme Court and High Court rulings, to clarify when such relaxations may be granted.


While rules emphasize adherence to schedules, Indian jurisprudence allows flexibility in exceptional cases, provided there is no prejudice to other parties or abuse of process. However, relaxations are not automatic rights but discretionary remedies exercised judiciously.


Contexts Where Relaxation Requests Arise


1. Court Proceedings and Personal Appearance Exemptions


Under Section 205 of the CrPC, magistrates have discretion to exempt accused persons from personal appearance, especially in summons cases. This is particularly relevant when interviews or hearings are likened to court-mandated appearances.



Similarly, in prolonged trials:
- Accused cooperating since 2013, appearing weekly, were granted exemptions as co-accused received similar relief. Puneet Dalmia VS Central Bureau of Investigation, Hyderabad - 2019 Supreme(SC) 1367
- Courts quashed rejections where no delay tactics were evident, allowing counsel representation. Suhas Palekar VS Badshah Hotel and Resorts - 2003 Supreme(Gau) 397


2. Recruitment and Selection Processes


Public employment recruitments often face challenges over interview relaxations, age limits, or eligibility.



Key ruling on selections:
- Presence of non-members vitiates committee proceedings, but participation does not waive objections if unaware of illegality. Dr. Shyam Lal Mathur VS University of Udaipur - 1980 Supreme(Raj) 260
- The petitioner's appearance before the Selection Committee for interview does not amount to waiver of his objection... as he was not aware of the illegality. Dr. Shyam Lal Mathur VS University of Udaipur - 1980 Supreme(Raj) 260


In nepotism challenges:
- Unauthorized qualification relaxations leading to appointments were set aside, stressing recruitment credibility. Karmesh Pratap Singh VS State of U. P. , Thru. Prin. Secy. Vidhan Sabha Sachivalaya, U. P. - 2024 Supreme(All) 410


3. Educational Admissions and Medical Interviews


Admissions to professional courses like MBBS highlight relaxation needs.



However, subjective interviews without objective tests (e.g., written exams) risk invalidation:
- An interview alone cannot be the sole test for selection, and should be accompanied by some other test. Kuldeep Pandita (Dr. ) VS State Of J. &K. - 1987 Supreme(J&K) 116


In minority institutions or state quotas:
- Relaxations must align with Articles 29(2) and 30(1), without overriding national interest. T. M. A. Pai Foundation VS State of Karnataka - 2002 7 Supreme 359


Judicial Principles Governing Relaxations


Principles of Natural Justice


Courts emphasize fairness:
- Notice and opportunity to show cause before cancellation. S. L. Kapoor VS Jagmohan - 1980 Supreme(SC) 421
- No waiver if unaware of procedural flaws during appearance. Dr. Shyam Lal Mathur VS University of Udaipur - 1980 Supreme(Raj) 260


Discretionary Exercise



Limits and Denials



Bullet-point guidelines from precedents:
- Document genuine reasons: Medical certificates, affidavits.
- No prejudice to others: Ensure no queue-jumping.
- Timely approach: Avoid post-selection challenges.
- Counsel representation: Viable under CrPC 205/317.
- Statutory compliance: Relaxations cannot alter eligibility basics.


Landmark Cases Analyzed


| Case ID | Key Holding | Context |
|---------|-------------|---------|
| Puneet Dalmia VS Central Bureau of Investigation, Hyderabad - 2019 Supreme(SC) 1367 | Exemption granted for cooperating accused; parity with co-accused. | CrPC 205, corruption trial. |
| Bijay Agarwal VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL - 2010 Supreme(Cal) 1137 | First appearance via counsel allowed; merits-based review. | Summons case exemption. |
| KUMARI REKHA SOMANI VS VICE CHANCELLOR, BANARAS HINDU UNIVERSITY, VARANASI - 1996 Supreme(All) 653 | Relaxation for missed medical interview due to fever. | MBBS admission. |
| Dr. Shyam Lal Mathur VS University of Udaipur - 1980 Supreme(Raj) 260 | No waiver for unaware procedural flaws. | University selection. |
| M. S. Raghavan VS Inspector of Police, Bangalore - 2022 Supreme(Mad) 352 | Travel permission with undertakings for family emergency. | CBI case appearance. |


These illustrate courts' equitable approach without undermining processes.


Practical Advice for Seeking Relaxation


If facing a relaxation for appearing interview held:
1. File applications under relevant provisions (e.g., CrPC 205, recruitment rules).
2. Provide evidence (medical reports, affidavits).
3. Approach via writs if denied arbitrarily (Articles 226/32).
4. Courts may impose conditions like bonds, undertakings, or costs.


In recruitments, challenge via service tribunals or High Courts promptly.


Key Takeaways



  • Relaxations are discretionary, granted on case merits, prioritizing justice over rigidity.

  • Personal appearance exemptions common in non-heinous cases with counsel.

  • Recruitment/admission relaxations scrutinized for equality and procedure.

  • Always act bona fide; abuse leads to denial and costs.


Disclaimer: This post provides general insights based on judicial precedents and is not legal advice. Legal situations vary; consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance. Rulings like those in GIAN SINGH VS STATE OF PUNJAB - 2012 7 Supreme 1 underscore that courts avoid frustrating revisory powers without evidence, emphasizing contextual analysis.


For deeper dives, review full judgments via official repositories.

Search Results for "Relaxation Rules for Appearing in Held Interviews"

GIAN SINGH VS STATE OF PUNJAB - 2012 7 Supreme 1

2012 7 Supreme 1 India - Supreme Court

R.M.LODHA, SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, ANIL R.DAVE

Mehta who had held himself out as the Attorney of the owner and his family members. The ratio of the decisions in B.S. ... Our conclusion concurs with the concession of counsel on both sides that merely because a copy of the order has not been produced ... , despite its presence in the records in the court, it is not possible for me to hold that the entire revisory power stands frustrated

Central Inland Water Transport Corporation LTD.  VS Brojo Nath Ganguly: Tarun Kanti Sengupta - 1986 Supreme(SC) 115

1986 0 Supreme(SC) 115 India - Supreme Court

D.P.MADAN, A.P.SEN

It is nothing but the Government operating behind a corporate veil, carrying out a governmental activity and governmental functions ... HELD TO BE “STATE” - IT IS NOT THAT ONLY WHERE ARTICLE 14 APPLIES THE RULES OF NATURAL JUSTICE COME INTO PLAY - GOVERNMENT COMPANY ... There can thus be no doubt that the corporation is “the State” within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution, as held in the ... His name was enrolled by the Bureau of Public Enterprises and he was called for an interview for the post of Chairman....

State Of Punjab VS Gurmitsingh - 1996 1 Supreme 485

1996 1 Supreme 485 India - Supreme Court

A.S.ANAND, S.SAGHIR AHMAD

(Para 15) ... Held : As a result of the aforesaid discussion, we find ... The presence of semen on the slides lent authentic corroborating to the testimony of the prosecutrix. ... If the totality and not circumstances appearing on the record of the case disclose that the prosecutrix does not have a strong motive ... According to the trial court Tirlok Singh PW6 became certain on 1.4.1984 that there was no outcome of the meeting between the panchayats

Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre VS State of Maharashtra - 2010 8 Supreme 353

2010 8 Supreme 353 India - Supreme Court

DALVEER BHANDARI, K.S.P.RADHAKRISHNAN

thereby the legislature had not envisaged that the life of the anticipatory bail would only last till the charge-sheet is filed- Held ... nbsp;Findings of the Court : ... The Court Held ... standard duration, the court granting anticipatory bail should leave it to the regular court to deal with the matter- This view was held ... English courts have developed this principle in relaxation of the rule of stare decisis. ... , relaxation of restraint, the bounds within which certain privileges are enjoyed, ....

D. K. Basu: Ashok K. Johari VS State Of W. B. : State Of U. P.  - 1996 8 Supreme 581

1996 8 Supreme 581 India - Supreme Court

KULDIP SINGH, A.S.ANAND

... Held : (1) The police personnel carrying out the arrest and handling ... The relief to redress the wrong for the established invasion of the fundamental rights of the citizen, under the public law jurisdiction ... ... (2) That the police officer carrying out the arrest of the arrestee ... It could also be extended to attendance for interview at a time convenient both to the suspect and to the police officer investigating ... ... In Nilabatl Baheras case (supra), it was ....

KUMARI REKHA SOMANI VS VICE CHANCELLOR, BANARAS HINDU UNIVERSITY, VARANASI - 1996 Supreme(All) 653

1996 0 Supreme(All) 653 India - Allahabad

R.R.K.TRIVEDI

The court held that the petitioner was entitled to relaxation of the rules regarding appearance before the Admission Committee because ... MEDICAL ADMISSION - DELAY IN APPEARING BEFORE ADMISSION COMMITTEE - RELAXATION OF RULES - REASONABLE AND JUSTIFIED - ADMISSION ... Whether the petitioner was entitled to relaxation of the rules regarding appearance before the Admission Committee. ... The third intervie....

R. R. PAUVYA VS C. KANAGAVEL - 2014 Supreme(Mad) 4587

2014 0 Supreme(Mad) 4587 India - Madras

S.VAIDYANATHAN, S.RAJENDRAN

to proceedings and efforts contemplated to be made by Family Court under statute cannot be effectively carried out through a recognised ... after appearance of respondent to proceedings - Therefore, parties should make personal appearance before Court as and when so stipulated ... or presence of parties concerned becomes inevitable and necessary at any rate from stage of hearing after appearance of other side ... under the statute cannot be effectively carri....

Dr.  Shyam Lal Mathur VS University of Udaipur - 1980 Supreme(Raj) 260

1980 0 Supreme(Raj) 260 India - Rajasthan

S.C.AGRAWAL

Whether the petitioner has waived his objection to the proceedings of the Selection Committee by appearing before it for interview ... The petitioner's appearance before the Selection Committee for interview does not amount to waiver of his objection to the proceedings ... the Selection Committee, as he was not aware of the illegality in the constitution of the Selection Committee at the time of the interview ... In these circumstances it cannot be said that the petit....

Puneet Dalmia VS Central Bureau of Investigation, Hyderabad - 2019 Supreme(SC) 1367

2019 0 Supreme(SC) 1367 India - Supreme Court

ASHOK BHUSHAN, M.R.SHAH

with his personal appearance/attendance in a case that pertains to the charge-sheet bearing C.C. ... Trial Court on every Friday and appellant as such is appearing before Trial Court on each and every Friday since 2013 – Nothing ... personal appearance/attendance – Prosecution for offences punishable under Sections 120B read with Sections ... It is therefore submitted that no case is made out to exempt the appellant from appearing before#HL....

Bijay Agarwal VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL - 2010 Supreme(Cal) 1137

2010 0 Supreme(Cal) 1137 India - Calcutta

KALIDAS MUKHERJEE

The Magistrate, without considering the merits of the application, directed the accused to make his first appearance before the Court ... personal appearance exemption under Section 205 CrPC denied by Magistrate without considering merits - Held, Magistrate's order was ... The court further held that in appropriate cases, the Magistrate can allow an accused to make even the first appearance through a ... Section 205 Cr.P.C. without insisting on the first appearance of....

P. R. Prajapati VS STATE - 1993 Supreme(Guj) 353

1993 0 Supreme(Guj) 353 India - Gujarat

V.H.BHAIRAVIA

The petitioners appeared in the said interview and test and after successfully getting through the said examination, the petitioners were further called for oral interview. ... Once the appellants were held to be eligible may be not srtictly under law but on equitable consideration, then it was wholly unjust to place them junior and under those who in the same examination secured lesser marks. ... Most of them cannot get the benefit of age relaxation under R. 6 of the kamataka Civil Services (General Recruitment) Rules 1....

Karmesh Pratap Singh VS State of U. P. , Thru.  Prin.  Secy.  Vidhan Sabha Sachivalaya, U. P.  - 2024 Supreme(All) 410

2024 0 Supreme(All) 410 India - Allahabad

ARUN BHANSALI, ATTAU RAHMAN MASOODI

The appellant on the other hand was stated not to have the requisite qualification of Graduation with one subject as Hindi, yet he participated in the interview held on 28.12.2015 and without declaration of result, the post of Information Officer was filled up by the appellant. ... Holding of the interview on 28.12.2015 is mentioned. The office note evidently shows that the same is silent about the declaration of the result of selection held on 28.12.2015. Surprisingly, even without declaration of the result until 14.07.....

NUPUR GHOSAL AND ORS vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 5404

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 5404 India - Calcutta High Court

According to the petitioners, as they are the untainted unappointed candidates of the 2016 recruitment process, they ought to be given the benefit of age relaxation. 4. Prayer has been made to permit the petitioners to participate in the interview process. ... It is noted that if the writ petition is allowed, then the petitioners would be entitled to the benefit of age relaxation. After the selection process is over, it may not be possible for the Commission to immediately accommodate the petitioners in any declared vacancy. ... Learned a....

Surender Kumar And Others
 VS Govt.  of NCT of Delhi And Others - 2023 Supreme(Del) 5992

2023 0 Supreme(Del) 5992 India - Delhi

V. KAMESWAR RAO, ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA

However, in case the contractual APPs are given age relaxation and considered for regular appointment on qualifying the interview, Shitize Rao and other suitably placed candidates who have not availed any age relaxation stand deprived of an opportunity of being selected for regular post of APP based ... The court referred to the advertisement in question and observed that the age relaxation is provided for the contractual employees who are working in the "same department" and not to contractual employees who are working ....

Chenthamarakshan (V.) v. State Bank of India - 1988 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 2

1988 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 2 India - Madras High Court

S. Ramalingam, J.

for the interview. ... In the counter - affidavit filed by the respondents, it is stated that since the departmental enquiry was pending against the petitioner, be was not considered for promotion in terms of this policy and the bark stopped him from appearing for the interview to be held on 10 November 1981. ... Subsequently, there was representation by the federation for relaxation of the rule in the case of employees who had been chargesheeted for minor misconduct or against whom the contemplated disciplinary action w....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

back ground Icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top