AI Overview...

Sulthan Said Ibrahim - The individual is involved in multiple legal cases concerning property rights, possession, and litigation. He is notably referenced in recent Supreme Court judgments and various legal proceedings related to land and property disputes INDDRAT00003138, M. S. Mohamed Ibrahim VS Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu - Madras, NSL Sugars Limited vs State Of Karnataka - Karnataka.
Property Ownership and Possession - Sulthan Ibrahim purchased land in Survey No.722 of Pallikaranai Village, occupying it until his lifetime. His possession was challenged due to encroachment by slum dwellers, and there are disputes regarding physical possession and rightful ownership SULTHAN SAID IBRAHIM vs PRAKASAN - Supreme Court, M. S. Mohamed Ibrahim VS Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu - Madras.
Legal Proceedings and Judgments - The Supreme Court, in its recent decision (2025 SCC Online SC 1218, May 23, 2025), referenced Sulthan Said Ibrahim in the context of property disputes, emphasizing principles from earlier rulings such as Bhanu Kumar Jain v. Archana Kumar (2005), regarding the conduct of parties and the importance of raising objections timely to avoid misuse of legal procedures INDDRAT00003138, N. K. S. M. Shahul Hameed VS Mohamed Ibrahim - Crimes, NSL Sugars Limited vs State Of Karnataka - Karnataka.
Family Background and Land Transactions - Sulthan Ibrahim is part of a family of brothers, including Abdul Hamid and Mohammed Ibrahim, involved in land transactions and disputes. He had settled in Singapore but maintained ownership and cultivation of lands in his native village, which were entrusted to his brothers for cultivation N. K. S. M. Shahul Hameed and Etc. VS Mohamed Ibrahim and Another, Etc. - Madras, B.Mohammed Ibrahim vs The Commissioner of Land Adm - Madras.
Legal Challenges and Court Orders - The courts have dealt with anticipatory bail issues involving Sulthan Ibrahim and his brothers, with orders being canceled or stayed, reflecting ongoing legal complexities N. K. S. M. Shahul Hameed VS Mohamed Ibrahim - Crimes.
Main Insights:
Sulthan Said Ibrahim is a prominent figure in land ownership and disputes involving properties in Tamil Nadu.
His legal cases involve issues of possession, encroachment, and procedural objections.
The Supreme Court's recent judgment underscores the importance of timely objection raising and adherence to legal principles, citing Bhanu Kumar Jain case.
Family dynamics and land transactions form a significant part of his legal narrative.

References: - Supreme Court judgment (2025 SCC Online SC 1218) - Land and possession cases: IND_SC_2287_2022, 02100118365, 02100016953 - Family and transaction details: INDMAD00000168645 - Procedural cases involving anticipatory bail: 00500006187

Search Results for "Sulthan Said Ibrahim"

2025 6 Supreme 85 • India - Supreme Court

J. B. PARDIWALA, R. MAHADEVAN

Suit for Specific Performance – Both Courts below have arrived at conclusion that exclusive possession of suit property could be said ... We find no infirmity in the said observation mad by the High Court. This Court in Bhanu Kumar Jain v. ... The original plaintiff objected to the said I.A., inter alia, on the ground that the appellant had failed to raise any of the said objections on any prior occasion and was doing the same only to obstruct and delay the execution proceedings. 21. ... Thus, it could be said....

• India - Supreme Court

SAID IBRAHIM Petitioner(s) VERSUS PRAKASAN & ORS. ... for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 4307/2022 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 29-11-2021 in OPC No. 2290/2013 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam) SULTHAN

2021 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 44674 • India - Kerala High Court

V. G. Arun, J.

M. S. Mohamed Ibrahim VS Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu

2016 0 Supreme(Mad) 119 • India - Madras

C.S.KARNAN

Sulthan Ibrahim under a registered Sale Deed pertaining to the property in Survey No.722 of Pallikaranai Village, measuring to an extent of 6.67 Acres. From the date of purchase, the said M.S. Sulthan Ibrahim has been occupying the same till his life time. ... The first petitioner has further submitted that the said land was encroached by the Slum Dwellers comprising more than 40 families and therefore, the physical possession has not been taken neither from the wrong person Mrs. Kamal....

N. K. S. M. Shahul Hameed and Etc. VS Mohamed Ibrahim and Another, Etc.

1991 0 Supreme(Mad) 333 • India - Madras

JANARTHANAM

Judgment :- ... Abdul Hamid also known as Hamid Rowther, Mohammed Ibrahim and Sulthan are brothers. They are natives of Arasarkulam village. Jaffar Ali and I. Raj Mohammed are the sons of Mohammed Ibrahim. ... Sulthan, it is said, went to Singapore and more or less permanently settled there. He appeared to have purchased a sizable extent of arable lands in his native village and those lands were stated to have been entrusted with his other two brothers for purpose of cultivation. ... In due course of t....

N. K. S. M. Shahul Hameed VS Mohamed Ibrahim

• India - Crimes

JANARTHANAM

Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 438 - Anticipatory Bail - Cancellation - Order granting anticipatory Bail to Abdul Hamid and Mobammed Ibrahim ... what has been stated above, have no other option but to cancel the orders granting anticipatory bail to Abdul Hamid and Mohammed Ibrahim ... . - Abdul Hamid also known as Hamid Rowther, Mohammed Ibrahim and Sulthan are brothers. They are natives of Arasarkulam village. Jaffar Ali and I. Raj. Mohammed are the sons of Mohammed Ibrahim. Sulthan, ....

B.Mohammed Ibrahim vs The Commissioner of Land Adm

2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 26308 • India - High Court of Madras

Hon`ble Ms.Justice P.T.ASHA

The said Sulthan Ibrahim had brought the land under cultivation in the year 1961. ... The said inamdarar and trustee Fazullah Khan Samoji had executed a Sasvathacowle deed in favour of one Sulthan Ibrahim. The said Sulthan Ibrahim after purchasing the above property, was in possession and enjoyment of the same. ... The said Sulthan Ibrahim was included in the above sai....

2025 Supreme(Online)(DRAT) 181 • India - Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal

Anil Kumar Srivastava, CJ

The Hon’ble Apex Court in a recent judgment in Sulthan Said Ibrahim -vs- Prakasan & Others (2025 SCC OnLine SC 1218) decided on 23rd May, 2025 has placed reliance upon Bhanu Kumar Jain -vs- Archana Kumar reported in a href="./..

NSL Sugars Limited vs State Of Karnataka

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 21751 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

RAVI V.HOSMANI

Sulthan Said Ibrahim v. Prakasan and Others , [(2025) SCC OnLine SC 1218]; and vi. D.N. Mangala v. Sunanda and Others , W.P. no.25246/2017. ... On said grounds, sought for dismissal of Writ Petition. 7. ... However, said order was challenged in WAs no.529/2024 and 526/2024 and on 25.04.2024, Division Bench in WA no.526/2024 had granted an interim order of stay of order passed by learned Single Judge. ... But said order is challenged by respondents in WA no.529/2024 along with connecte....

Mr. Imran Sha Choudhury vs Punjab National Bank

2025 Supreme(Online)(DRAT) 500 • India - Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal

Anil Kumar Srivastava, J

The Hon'ble Apex Court in a recent judgment in Sulthan Said Ibrahim -vs- Prakasan & Others (2025 SCC OnLine SC 1218) decided on 23rd May, 2025 has placed reliance upon Bhanu Kumar Jain - vs- Archana Kumar reported in [(2005) 1 SCC 787] wherein it was held that:- "That the principles

Filter by Legal Phrase

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

Approbate and Reprobate: Key Legal Doctrine Explained Vague Threatening Phone Calls: Why They Fail in Court Does SCC Own Copyright on Full Text Judgments? G.O. Ms No. 108: TN Salesman & Packer Recruitment Rules Article 226 vs 227: Key Differences in High Court Powers Judgments on One-Time GNA Charges in India TIP: Judicial vs Executive Magistrate Rules Explained Can a Sole Dissenting Member Block Society Redevelopment? How to Sue Fake Facebook Accounts for Defamation in India Illustrations: Person Dominating Will in Indian Law Perusal in Court Orders: What It Means in Law Litigant Vigilance: Essential Duty in Court Proceedings What to Do If Company Suit Signatory Dies Renting House Without Rent Agreement in India: Risks Stay on Money Realization After Ejectment: Is It Possible?