SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next

Telangana Monthly Digest – February 2026 - 2026-03-09

Subject :

Telangana Monthly Digest – February 2026

Supreme Today News Desk

Supreme(Online)(Tel) 2026 4294
Telangana (2000)

Chakali Agamaiah vs The State of Telangana

Subject: Criminal Law – Murder and Homicide

Keywords: conviction, appeal, insufficient evidence, contradictions, acquittal, criminal procedure, burden of proof, witness reliability, life imprisonment, sentence set aside

The court reiterated that in criminal trials, if two interpretations are possible, the one favoring the accused must be adopted, especially when prosecution evidence is found unreliable.

Headnote:

(A) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 374(2) - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 302 r/w Section 34 - Conviction under murder charge - Convicted appellants were sentenced to life imprisonment and fine, later appealed on grounds of insufficient evidence and contradictions in testimonies. (Paras 1, 24-34) (B) Evidence - Standard of proof in criminal trials - If two constructions are possible, ...


Supreme(Online)(Tel) 2026 4293

N.Somasekhar Rao vs The Central Bureau of Investigation

Subject: Criminal Law – Fraud

Keywords: criminal petition, valuation fraud, bank loan, criminal conspiracy, abuse of process, equitable mortgage, inflated valuations, specific allegations, prima facie case, criminal misconduct

The court upheld that specific allegations of fraudulent conduct can sustain criminal charges against a property valuer providing inflated valuations to facilitate loan approvals.

Headnote:

(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 482 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 120-B, 420, 468, and 471 - Quashing of proceedings - Petition dismissed as prima facie specific allegations against the valuer established that he issued inflated valuation reports to facilitate loan fraud - A.2 and A.3 used the inflated valuations to deceive the bank and obtain loans totaling Rs. 9 Crores. (Pa...


Supreme(Online)(Tel) 2026 4132

Telangana Public Service Commission vs Paramesh Matta

Subject: Administrative Law – Public Service Selection

Keywords: examination integrity, evaluations, procedural discrepancies, Public Service Commission, allegations of bias, evaluation methods, writ appeal outcome, transparency, systemic irregularity, candidate evaluations

The court held that procedural discrepancies and allegations, without substantial evidence of bias or systemic failure, do not merit interference with the integrity of the examination process.

Headnote:

(A) Telangana Public Service Commission Act - Conduct of Examinations - Writ Petition pertaining to Group-I Services Examination for 563 posts - Allegations of irregularities in conducting Mains examination, procedural aspects, and evaluation method not established. Court ruled that there was no demonstrable bias or malice. The evaluation method adopted, including measures for examiner variability...


Supreme(Online)(Tel) 2026 4134

Gorati Sunitha vs Union of India

Subject: Administrative Law – Public Utilities

Keywords: transmission lines, statutory compliance, deviation, public utility, agricultural lands, judicial restraint, grievances, alternative remedies, electricity regulations, legal contest

The court established that statutory compliance in transmission projects under the Electricity Act permits necessary adjustments while safeguarding public interests, affirming the adequacy of legal re....

Headnote:

(A) Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 68(1), 164 - Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Section 16(1) - Works of Licensees Rules, 2006 - Writ Appeal against the dismissal of writ petition seeking mandamus against erection of transmission lines over agricultural lands - Notification issued for alignment approval, but allegations of deviation from approved route denied by respondents - The learned Single Jud...


Supreme(Online)(Tel) 2026 4343

Dr. R. Prashanth Rao vs The State of Telangana

Subject: Administrative Law – Medical Regulation

Keywords: clinical establishments, regulatory authority, jurisdiction, personal responsibility, arbitrary notice, Ethics Panel, resignation, harassment, procedural fairness, representation

The authority to regulate clinical establishments lies exclusively with the designated authority under the Clinical Establishments Act, rendering actions by others unauthorized and the allegations aga....

Headnote:

(A) Clinical Establishments (Registration and Regulation) Act, 2010 - Section 33 - Indian Medical Council (Professional Conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) Regulation Act, 2002 - Notice issued by Ethics Panel challenged for lack of jurisdiction - Authority to inspect clinical establishments lies solely with designated authority under the 2010 Act, making the respondent's actions invalid. (Paras 2.2, 2....


Supreme(Online)(Tel) 2026 4308

Kottala Ashok vs Maisa Bheemavva @ Bheema Bhai

Subject: Civil Law – Land Disputes

Keywords: Advocate Commissioner, Boundary Dispute, Perpetual Injunction, Ownership, Demarcation, Possession, Jurisdiction, Evidence Collection, Civil Revision, Legal Clarity

In cases of boundary disputes, the appointment of an Advocate Commissioner is permissible to clarify boundaries, while ownership disputes demand separate adjudication.

Headnote:

(A) Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Order XXVI Rule 9 and Section 151 - Appointment of Advocate Commissioner - Trial Court allowed the petition for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner for demarcating land boundaries, held not as collection of evidence, but to resolve boundary disputes. Court upheld the lower court's order emphasizing clarity on the extent of the property each party claims and ...


Supreme(Online)(Tel) 2026 4606

Ramanthapuram Krishna vs The State of Telangana

Subject: Criminal Law – Criminal Procedure

Keywords: FIR, quash, civil suit, criminal allegations, public property, investigation, obstruction, mandatory procedure, property rights, public convenience

Criminal proceedings cannot be quashed merely due to related civil disputes; both can coexist if criminal allegations substantiate independent wrongful conduct.

Headnote:

(A) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 - Sections 324, 285, 270, 223, and 3(5) - Quashing of FIR - Pending civil suit - Allegations relate to obstruction and damage to Nakshabata, allegedly arising from civil disputes - Criminal complaint considered a counterblast to civil suit; mere existence of civil dispute not grounds for quashing FIR - Legal procedures under Section 35(3) of BNSS must be followed ...


Supreme(Online)(Tel) 2026 4341

Ms. BNR Infra and Leasing vs Union of India

Subject: Banking Law – Fraudulent Transactions

Keywords: fraud, forged documents, SARFAESI Act, banking regulations, natural justice, declaration, loan account, One Time Settlement, NPA, legal proceedings

The classification of a loan account as 'fraud' based on forged documents is valid if it adheres to the existing regulatory framework and does not require a pre-decisional hearing.

Headnote:

(A) Banking Regulation Act - SARFAESI Act - Master Directions on Frauds issued by Reserve Bank of India - Declaration of loan account as 'fraud' due to submission of forged documents for credit facilities - Bank's declaration of fraud based on objective verification upheld. (Paras 2.1, 6, 7, and 8) (B) Principles of Natural Justice - Lack of mandatory pre-decisional hearing prior to classification...


Supreme(Online)(Tel) 2026 4344

Sri Balvinder Singh vs The Union of India

Subject: Passport Law – Passport Issuance and Renewal

Keywords: passport, renewal, criminal proceedings, personal liberty, GSR 570(E), Passports Act, court order, refusal, natural justice, lawful grounds

The court affirmed that a passport may be denied if criminal proceedings are pending, reinforcing the requirement for a court order for permission to travel abroad as per Gazette Notification GSR 570(....

Headnote:

(A) Passports Act, 1967 - Section 6(2)(f) - Gazette Notification GSR 570(E) dated 25.08.1993 - Refusal of passport renewal - Petitioner contended that pending criminal cases cannot be grounds for denial of passport renewal as it violates right to personal liberty - The Court ruled that regulations permit refusal if criminal proceedings are pending, and no order from courts permitting travel was su...


Supreme(Online)(Tel) 2026 4342

Dr. P. Swamy Goud vs The State of Telangana

Subject: Medical Law – Medical Negligence and Ethics

Keywords: disciplinary action, medical practitioner, negligence, due process, ethical violations, complaints, procedural requirements, explanation, medical council, regulations

The notice issued for disciplinary action against a medical practitioner must comply with mandatory procedural requirements, failing which it is considered void and unenforceable.

Headnote:

(A) Andhra Pradesh Medical Practitioners Registration Act, 1968 - Rules Regulating the Procedure at an Enquiry held under Sections 15 and 17 - India Medical Council (Professional Conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations, 2002 - Allegations of medical negligence and ethical violations - Notice issued by Medical Council alleged violations of Regulations 1.4.2 and 7.20 for improper treatment of a c...


Supreme(Online)(Tel) 2026 2635

Mr. Syed Zainul Abideen Hussaini Quadri vs Syed Mohammed Mohiuddin Quadri

Subject: Waqf Law – Dispute Resolution

Keywords: Waqf Board, Compromise Deed, Maintainability, Writ Petition, Jurisdiction, Family Succession, Legal Heirs, Waqf Tribunal, Article 14, Statutory Remedies

Writ jurisdiction cannot be exercised when statutory remedies under the Waqf Act are available, affirming the exclusive jurisdiction of Waqf Tribunal over disputes concerning Waqf properties.

Headnote:

(A) Waqf Act, 1995 - Section 63 and Section 83 - Writ Appeal against Single Judge's order setting aside proceedings of Waqf Board regarding appointment of Towliath Committee - The appointment was made ignoring the preferential claim outlined in a Compromise Deed - Writ Petition was deemed non-maintainable due to availability of an alternative statutory remedy - The Tribunal is the proper forum to ...


Supreme(Online)(Tel) 2026 5015

Sirigiri Shanker and two others vs The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana and another

Subject: Criminal Law – Quashing of Proceedings

Keywords: quash, criminal petition, deceptive intent, PDS rice, IPC, Essential Commodities Act, jurisdiction, tendency, court's observation, abuse of process

Criminal liability under IPC and EC Act requires clear evidence of deceptive intent, which was absent in this case.

Headnote:

The Court analyzed Section 420 of IPC and Section 7 of the EC Act in the context of the allegations against the petitioners, specifically regarding the procurement and sale of PDS rice. The Court noted the lack of a beneficiary complaint and referenced prior decisions where similar proceedings were quashed, concluding the actual criminal intent was absent. The prosecution's claims were deemed unte...


Breaking News

View All
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top