SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(SC) 1000

K. M. JOSEPH, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA
Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur – Appellant
Versus
Akashdeep Morya – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) :Meenakshi Arora, Mukul Kumar, Advocates
For the Respondent(s):Gp. Capt. Karan Singh Bhati, Dashrath Singh, Rajesh Kumar, Nimesh Suthar, Aditya Chouhan, Gunjan Negi, Advocates

JUDGMENT :

K.M. JOSEPH, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. By the impugned judgment, the High Court has allowed the writ petition filed by the first respondent against the decision of the appellant by which it found that the first respondent did not deserve to be appointed to the Civil Judges’ cadre.

3. The appellant issued a notification dated 25.11.2013 inviting applications for filling up the post of Civil Judge (Junior Division). The respondent applied pursuant to the same. It would appear that there was no requirement in the application for indicating about involvement of the candidate in any criminal case. However, when the matter was taken for verification, the respondent volunteered with the information with regard to his being implicated in certain criminal cases. We may notice the details of the cases which are as follows :

FIR No./Police Station

Under Sections

Police Investigation

Decision of Court

81/25.06.99

341, 323, 147, 148, 149, 504, 324 IPC

Challan dated 26.07.1999

Acquitted on 05.02.2011 on the basis of compromise.

75/03.05.11

420, 4

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top