SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1000

SANDEEP MEHTA, JOYMALYA BAGCHI
Abhimanyu – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Sunil Kumar Sharma, AOR, Mr. Hitesh Singh, Adv., Ms. Tanvi Munjal, Adv., Ms. Shivani, Adv.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's request for bail. (Para 1)
2. court's denial of bail application. (Para 2)
3. direction for surrender and filing of bail application. (Para 3 , 4)

ORDER :

2. We are not inclined to extend the indulgence of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner. The Special Leave Petition is dismissed.

4. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top