Abhimanyu vs State of Haryana - 2025 Supreme(SC) 1000

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(SC) 1000

SANDEEP MEHTA, JOYMALYA BAGCHI
Abhimanyu – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Sunil Kumar Sharma, AOR, Mr. Hitesh Singh, Adv., Ms. Tanvi Munjal, Adv., Ms. Shivani, Adv.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's request for bail. (Para 1)
2. court's denial of bail application. (Para 2)
3. direction for surrender and filing of bail application. (Para 3 , 4)

ORDER :

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. We are not inclined to extend the indulgence of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner. The Special Leave Petition is dismissed.

3. The petitioner shall surrender before the Trial Court within a period of three weeks from today and shall be at liberty to file a regular bail application, which shall be considered and decided on its own merits in accordance with law, without prejudice to the rights of the police to seek custody remand.

4. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document