SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(SC) 625

B. R. GAVAI, VIKRAM NATH, SANJAY KAROL
Jaya Thakur – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For parties Mr. Tushar Mehta,Solicitor General Mr. S.V. Raju,A.S.G. Mr. Zoheb Hossain,Adv. Mr. Kanu Agrawal,Adv. Mr. Udai Khanna,Adv. Mr. Mayank Pandey,Adv. Mr. Adit Khorana,Adv. Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Gopal Sankarnarayanan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Shrutanjaya Bhardwaj, Adv. Ms. Tanya Srivastava, Adv. Ms. Nupur Kumar, AOR Mr. Anup G. Choudhary,Sr.Adv. Mr. Varun Thakur,Adv. Mr. Ramkaran,Adv. Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Abishek Manu Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Muhammad Ali Khan, Adv. Mr. Omar Hoda, Adv. Mr. Abishek Jebaraj, AOR Ms. Eesha Bakshi, Adv. Mr. Uday Bhatia, Adv. Mr. Kamran Khan, Adv. Ms. A. Reyna Shruti, Adv. Mr. Ravi Raghunath,AOR Mr. Prashant Bhushan, AOR Ms. Alice Raj, Adv. Mr. Braj Kishore Mishra, AOR Mr. Sarim Naved, Adv. Mr. Aakarsh Kamra, AOR Mr. Muhammad Ali Khan, Adv. Mr. Omar Hoda, Adv. Mr. Abishek Jebaraj, AOR Ms. Eesha Bakshi, Adv. Mr. Uday Bhatia, Adv. Mr. Kamran Khan, Adv. Ms. A. Reyna Shruti, Adv. Petitioner-in-person Mr. Vishal Jogdand,Adv. Mr. Sharangouda Patil,Adv. Mr. Randhir Kumar Ojha, AOR Ms. Vanshaja Shukla, AOR

JUDGMENT :

B.R. GAVAI, J.

1. This batch of writ petitions seeks a writ, order or directions in the nature of certiorari for quashing of order dated 17th November 2021 passed by the respondent No. 1 for further extension of tenure of the respondent No. 2. In Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1106 of 2022, a further extension granted to respondent No. 2 vide order dated 17th November 2022 has also been challenged. All these petitions also challenge the validity of Central Vigilance Commission (Amendment) Act, 2021, the Delhi Special Police Establishment (Amendment) Act, 2021 and the Fundamental (Amendment) Rules, 2021.

2. The facts, in brief, giving rise to the present writ petitions are as under. The reference hereinafter to the parties would be made as found in the cause-title of Writ Petition (Civil) No. 456 of 2022.

3. The respondent No. 2-Sanjay Kumar Mishra in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 456 of 2022, who was working as Principal Special Director in the Directorate of Enforcement (“ED” for short) was appointed as Director of Enforcement for a period of two years from the date of his assum


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top