SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(SC) 661

C. T. RAVIKUMAR, SUDHANSHU DHULIA
Sandeep Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. M. Shoeb Alam, AOR Ms. Fauzia Shakil, AOR Mr. Ujjwal Singh, Adv. Ms. Purnima Krishna, AOR Mr. Shailesh Madiyal, AOR Mr. Rajnesh Singh Parihar, Adv. Mr. Anupam Raina, AOR Mr. Sunando Raha, Adv. Mr. Kunal Malik, Adv. Mr. Gm Kawoosa, Adv. Ms. Palak Mittal, Adv. Ms. Manjula Gupta, AOR Mr. Shailesh Madiyal, AOR Mr. Vaibhav Sabharwal, Adv. Mr. Akshay Kumar, Adv. Ms. S. Janani, AOR Mr. Amar Nath Singh, Adv. Mr. Shiv Singh Yadav, Adv. Mr. Priya Ranjan Kumar, Adv. Ms. Beena Goyal, Adv. Mr. Hitesh Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. S.K. Rajora, Adv. Mr. Akhileshwar Jha, Adv. Ms. Niharika Dwivedi, Adv. Mr. Amit Kumar Chawla, Adv. Mr. Mukul Kumar, AOR Mr. Anish Roy, Adv. Mr. Dileep Singh Rajpurohit, Adv. Mr. M. Shoeb Alam, Adv. Mr. Siddhant Buxy, AOR Mr. Krishna Sumanth, Adv. Mr. Agastya Sen, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

SUDHANSHU DHULIA, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. Heard Shri Ram Naresh Yadav learned Counsel for the appellant/complainant, Shri Vishal Mahajan, Deputy Advocate General for the State/Respondent No. 1 and Shri Shreeyash U. Lalit learned Counsel for Respondent No. 2.

3. The appellant before this Court was the informant in the case and was a prosecution witness (PW-9), in Sessions Trial No. 8/2018, which is being held before the Additional Sessions Judge, Sirsa, Haryana, under Sections 458, 460, 323, 302, 148, 149 and 285 of IPC, 1860 read with Section 25 of Arms Act, 1959. The incident is of 12:30 mid night dated 07.09.2017 which occurred at Sirsa, Haryana. The First Information Report reveals that there were in total fifteen assailants which had broke open the complainant’s house, in the middle of the night and had come in order to assault the inmates of the house. Out of these assailants seven have been named who were armed with lathi and three of the named assailants/accused namely Ramesh Gandhi, Kalu Jakhar and Pawan were armed with gun and pistols respectively. Police after investigation had filed chargesheet against nine persons, but not against Ramesh Gandhi, Kalu Jakhar or Pa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top