ORDER

M.R. Shah, J. - Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay dated 24.06.2022 passed in First Appeal ST No. 25980 of 2021 preferred by the appellant - the Board of Control for Cricket in India (hereinafter referred to as 'BCCI') by which the High Court has dismissed the said first appeal, which was filed against the judgment and order passed by the Employees' Insurance Court at Bombay dated 09.09.2021, declaring that the BCCI is covered within the meaning of 'shop' as per notification dated 18.09.1978 issued by the Government of Maharashtra under the provisions of Section 1(5) of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the 'ESI Act') and remitted the matter for determining the contribution from BCCI, BCCI has preferred the present special leave petitions.

2. By communication dated 22.06.2011, issued by the Regional Director of Employees' State Insurance Corporation, Mumbai, it was communicated that the BCCI is covered under the provisions of ESI Act w.e.f. 01.01.2007 and it was allotted a Code number, indicating applicability of the provisions of the ESI Act to the BCCI. The