Back
J. B. PARDIWALA, SANDEEP MEHTA
Fertilizer Corporation Of India Limited – Appellant
Versus
Coromandal Sacks Private Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background information on the case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 2. appeal process and judicial decisions taken in the earlier courts. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 3. arguments presented by original defendants and their context. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 4. rebuttal by the original plaintiff. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 5. court analysis on the legislative framework. (Para 39 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51) |
| 6. interpretation of interest applicable during sick company status. (Para 62 , 88) |
| 7. interpretation and implications of section 22 of the 1985 act. (Para 102 , 103 , 106 , 108 , 110) |
| 8. final decisions and implications. (Para 142 , 143 , 144 , 145 , 146) |
JUDGMENT :
| INDEX |
| A. FACTUAL MATRIX |
| i. Case of the original plaintiff before the trial court |
| ii. Case of the original defendants before the trial court |
| iii. Appeals before the High Court |
| B. SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE APPELLANTS/ORIGINAL DEFENDANTS |
| C. SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENT/ORIGINAL PLAINTIFF |
| D. ANALYSIS |
| i. Proceedings in respect of FCIL before the BIFR |
| ii. Is |
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
