SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(SC) 1121

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
DIPANKAR DATTA, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA
Babu Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Neeraj Sharma, Sr. Adv. Mr. Shinom Prashar, Adv. Mr. Amol Chitravanshi, AOR Mr. Mool Singh, Adv. Mr. Kailas Bajirao Autade, AOR Mr. Bhupender Singh, AOR Mr. Nishant Kumar, AOR Mr. Alok Vajpayee, AOR Mr. Naresh Kumar Tomar, Adv. Mr. Rajeev Gupta, Adv. Mr. Parminder Singh Bhullar, AOR Mr. Ajay Marwah, AOR Mr. Swaroopananda Mishra, Adv. Mr. Parantap Singh, Adv. Ms. Tajender Virdi, Adv. Mr. Swaroopanada Mishra, Adv. Ms. Tajinder Virdi, Adv. Mr. Tarun Rajput, Adv. Mr. Mrigank Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. Mirgank Bharwaj, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Shukla, Adv. Mr. Gourave Kumar Agarwal, AOR Mr. Abhinav Mukerji, Sr. Adv. Mrs. Bihu Sharma, Adv. Mr. Vikrant Thakur, Adv. Ms. Khushboo Hora, Adv. Ms. Archita Nigam, Adv. Mr. Shubham Singh Guleria, Adv. Ms. Mrinal Gopal Elker, AOR
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Anup Kumar Rattan, A.G. Mr. Arman Sharma, Adv. Ms. Shimpy Sharma, Adv. Mr. Vishwanathan Iyer, Adv. Ms. Alexandra Celestine, Adv. Mr. Puneet Rasta, Adv. Ms. Swati Daraik, Adv. Mr. Shalab Thakur, Adv. Ms. Anuradha Arputham, AOR Mr. Divyanshu Kumar Srivastava, AOR Mr. Yash Jain, Adv.

Table of Content
1. eviction proceedings under 1971 act (Para 5)
2. appellants' claims regarding unauthorized occupation (Para 7 , 8)
3. deficiencies in the eviction order (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
4. requirement of fair procedures in eviction (Para 15 , 17)
5. demarcation exercise ordered for unauthorized occupants (Para 16 , 18)
6. restoration of status-quo ante in eviction appeals (Para 21 , 22 , 23)

ORDER

1. Permission to file special leave petition in SLP (c) Dy No. 47646/2024 is granted.

2. Delay in filing application(s) for setting aside abatement is condoned. Abatement is set aside. Application(s) for Substitution are allowed.

3. Leave granted.

4. Since issues of law and fact in this batch of appeals are identical, we propose to dispose of the same by this common judgment and order.

5. These appeals arise out of orders passed in eviction proceedings under the Himachal Pradesh Public Premises and Land (Eviction and Rent Recovery) Act, 1971 [1971 Act]. All the appellants suffered findings that they were in unauthorized occupation of ‘forest land’. Eviction orders passed under Section 5 of the 1971 Act recording such findings together with appellate orders passed under section 9 the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top