SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 114

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
J.B. Pardiwala, R. Mahadevan, JJ.
Rajeeb Kalita – Petitioner
Versus
Union of India & Ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition (C) No. 538 of 2023
Decided On : 15-01-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Ms. Charu Ambwani, AOR
For the Respondents: Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, A.S.G. Ms. Swarupama Chaturvedi, Sr. Adv. Ms. Ruchi Kohli, Adv. Ms. Ameyavikrama Thanvi, Adv. Mr. Aman Sharma, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Dr. Ravindra Chingale, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Dharmadhikari, Adv. Mr. Aaditya Aniruddha Pande, AOR Mr. Anando Mukherjee, AOR Mr. Adarsh Upadhyay, AOR Mr. Amit Singh, Adv. Mr. Aman Pathak, Adv. Ms. Pallavi Kumari, Adv. Mr. Shashank Pachauri, Adv. Mr. Ramesh Babu M. R., AOR Mr. Yashvardhan, Adv. Mr. Apoorv Shukla, AOR Mr. Prashant Shrikant Kenjale, AOR Mr. Kunal Chatterji, AOR Ms. Maitrayee Banerjee, Adv. Mr. Rohit Bansal, Adv. Ms. Mrinalini Mukherjee, Adv. Mr. Apoorv Kurup, AOR Mr. Amit Gupta, AOR Mr. Malak Manish Bhatt, AOR Mr. P. I. Jose, AOR Mr. Anupam Raina, AOR Ms. Osheen Bhat, Adv. Mr. Ashok Mathur, AOR Mr. E. C. Vidya Sagar, AOR Mr. Hemant Kumar Sagar, Adv. Mr. Shailendra Singh, Adv. Mr. P. S. Sudheer, AOR Mr. Rishi Maheshwari, Adv. Mr. Bharat Sood, Adv. Ms. Anne Mathew, Adv. Mr. Jai Govind M J, Adv. Mr. Gautam Narayan, AOR Mr. Arjun Garg, AOR Ms. Kriti Gupta, Adv. Ms. Sagun Srivastava, Adv. Mr. Saaransh Shukla, Adv. Mr. Sanjai Kumar Pathak, AOR Mrs. Shashi Pathak, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Tripathi, Adv. Mr. Ahanthem Henry, Adv. Mr. Mohan Singh, Adv. Mr. Aniket Rajput, Adv. Ms. Khoisnam Nirmala Devi, Adv. Mr. Kumar Mihir, AOR Ms. Asmita Singh, AOR Ms. Garima Bajaj, AOR Ms. Aakanksha Kaul, Adv. Mr. Gopal Jha, AOR Ms. Enakshi Mukhopadhyay Siddhanta, AOR Mr. Ravi Kumar S, Adv. Mr. Venkata Raghuvamsy D., AOR Mr. Pai Amit, AOR Ms. Pankhuri Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. Tathagata Dutta, Adv. Mr. Abhiyudaya Vats, Adv. Mr. Kushal Dube, Adv. Mr. Nikhil Pahwa, Adv. Ms. Radhika Gautam, AOR

Access to proper sanitation is a fundamental right under Article 21, requiring the State to provide and maintain adequate toilet facilities in judicial premises for all genders.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Articles 21, 47, and 48A - Public Interest Litigation for basic toilet facilities in Courts - The right to live with dignity includes access to sanitation, which is essential for public health and hygiene - The State has a duty to provide adequate facilities for all genders, including transgenders and persons with disabilities - The Supreme Court emphasized the need for separate, accessible toilets in all court premises. (Paras 2, 3, 4, 10, 11)

(B) Public Health - The absence of adequate washroom facilities undermines equality and poses a barrier to the fair administration of justice - The Court directed the establishment of a committee in each High Court to oversee the construction and maintenance of toilet facilities. (Paras 10, 11)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, a practicing Advocate, filed a PIL under Article 32 for ensuring basic toilet facilities in all Courts/Tribunals, arguing that sanitation is a fundamental right under Article 21. (Paras 2, 3)

Findings of Court:
The Court held that access to proper sanitation is a fundamental right and directed the construction of separate toilet facilities for all genders in court premises. (Paras 11, 12)

Issues: The main issues included the adequacy of toilet facilities in courts and the need for separate provisions for different genders and persons with disabilities. (Paras 10, 11)

Ratio Decidendi: The Court ruled that the right to life includes the right to a hygienic environment, emphasizing the State's duty to provide adequate sanitation facilities in judicial premises. (Paras 10, 11)

Result: The writ petition was disposed of with directions for compliance. (Para 13)

JUDGMENT

R. MAHADEVAN, J.

1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the materials placed before us.

2. This writ petition styled as “Public Interest Litigation” has been filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India for the following reliefs:

    (i) To issue a Writ of Mandamus directing all the States and Union Territories to ensure that basic toilet facilities are made available in all Courts/Tribunals in the Country for men, women and handicapped persons including transgenders, and to provide and maintain urinals and similar conveniences at appropriate locations in every Court premises as envisaged under Article 21 of the Constitution of India; and

    (ii) To issue a Writ of Mandamus directing all the States and Union Territories to construct public toilets and public conveniences in all the Courts/ Tribunals and the same should be identifiable and accessible by the advocates/ litigants/ court staff etc. for men and women (including transgender persons) and to provide amenities for persons with disabilities and maintain the same.

3. The Petitioner is a practicing Advocate enrolled with the Bar Council of Assam and practicing in the Courts in Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram, Arunachal Pradesh and Sikkim. He has stated that the scope of the fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution of India includes the right to live with dignity and all the necessities of life, such as, adequate nutrition, clothing, health, etc., and no human being can live with dignity unless there are facilities to maintain basic hygiene.

4. It is also averred in the writ petition that the Constitution of India imposes a duty on the State to improve public health, raise the standard of living, and increase the level of nutrition, which is outlined in Article 47 under the Directive Principles of State Policy. Sanitation is also a part of Article 48A of the Constitution that mandates the State to protect and improve the environment.

5. Adding further, the petitioner stated that the Government of India, Ministry of Urban Development has initiated the ‘Swachh Bharat Mission (SBM)’, which has set out certain guidelines, amongst others, for the purpose of construction of public toilets in general. That apart, the World Health Organization (WHO) of which, India is a member, considers the health of human beings as the most basic and essential asset, regardless of age, gender, socio-economic/ethnic background.

6. That apart, the petitioner also pointed out the international policies framed with respect to construction of public toilets for men, women and handicapped persons including transgenders, and maintenance of hygienic condition. To substantiate the averments made in the writ petition, the petitioner placed reliance on a catena of decisions rendered by this Court as well as by other High Courts.

6.1. Ultimately, the petitioner submitted that it is just and necessary that clean and hygienic toilets are to be provided not only in the places, such as, markets, train stations, tourist places, near office complexes, or other public areas where there are considerable number of people passing by, but also in the Court complex/ premises, where advocates/litigants/ staff members are working in a large number, otherwise, the right conferred by Article 21 cannot be meaningful. Thus, this writ petition by the petitioner is before us.

7. This Court by order dated 08.05.2023 1 [1 1.On the request of the counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, we grant permission to implead the High Courts as party respondents to these proceedings.

2. Notice shall issue to all the High Courts through their Registrars General.

3. The High Courts shall file tabular statements on affidavit before the next date of listing indicating all relevant details pertaining to:

(a) Availability of toilets for men, women and transgenders;

(b) Steps taken for maintenance of toilets;

(c) Whether separate toilet facilities are made available to litigants, lawyers and judicial officers; a

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top