Back
J. B. PARDIWALA, R. MAHADEVAN
U. Sudheera – Appellant
Versus
C. Yashoda – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
R. MAHADEVAN, J.
Leave granted.
2. The challenge made in this appeal is to the interim order dated 20.09.2024 passed by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi1[Hereinafter referred to as “the High Court”] in the Second Appeal bearing No.518/2023. For the sake of clarity and ease of reference, the order impugned herein is reproduced below:
Therefore, service of respondent No.8 is ‘held sufficient’.
Learned counsel for the appellant is permitted to take out steps for filing substitute service against the respondent Nos.4, 6 and 7.
It was represented by the learned Senior Counsel for the appellant, Sri S. Rajendra Prasad that the appellant is in possession and enjoyment of the scheduled property as on today and the respondents are making efforts for interfering with the possession of the appellant.
Considering the representation made by the learned Senior Counsel for the appellant, both parties are directed to maintain status-quo till 25.09.2024.
List the matter on 25.09.2024.”
3. The Respondent No.1 is the plaintiff in the suit in O.S.No.48 of 2011; Appellant Nos.1 to 3 are the l
(1) Second Appeal – High Court cannot pass any ad interim order for a limited period, before framing substantial question(s) of law, while dealing with a second appeal filed under Order XLI r/w Secti....
The suit for injunction is not maintainable when the title of the plaintiff is under a cloud, requiring a declaration of title for proper adjudication.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the limited scope of interference by the High Court in a second appeal under Section 100 of CPC, emphasizing that findings of fact will generally n....
The possession is a pure question of fact, and the findings of fact recorded by the lower courts cannot be interfered with unless they are based on no evidence or are perverse.
(1) Redemption of usufructuary mortgage – Defective counter claim of defendant would not take away statutory right to redeem usufructuary mortgage.(2) First appeal can be filed against decree and not....
Under section 100 CPC, after the 1976 amendment, it is essential for the High Court to formulate a substantial question of law and it is not permissible to reverse the judgment of the first appellate....
Second appeal – Existence of substantial question of law is sine qua non for exercise of this jurisdiction – Jurisdiction under second appeal not to be exercised merely because an alternate view is p....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
