SHARAD KUMAR SHARMA
SANTOSH AGGARWAL – Appellant
Versus
ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER, GARHWAL MANDAL, PAURI – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Hon'ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J (Oral)
Apparently the issue, which has been raised by the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner, seems to be too trifle in nature, but owing to the circumstances of the proceedings, and the stage at which, it has been agitated before this Court, by virtue of the present writ petition, it deals with a very prime issue which had been sought to be addressed by the petitioner pertaining to the competence of the courts created under the Land Revenue Act, 1901, for the purposes of grant of an interim order, in a proceedings particularly which are being held at the stage of the revision under Section 219 of the Land Revenue Act, 1901.
2. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner has harped upon a question, that when the entire proceedings which are contemplated under the Land Revenue Act, 1901, which emanates from the principle proceedings under Section 34/35 of the Land Revenue Act, 1901, for the purposes of making the alterations of the revenue entries of rights, in the revenue records, or pertaining to the devolvement of rights over the land, by virtue of succession or by virtue of transfer, and when the ultimate order which had been passed by
Chintamani Sharan Nath Sahadeo Vs. State of Bihar & ors
Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi Vs. Bansi Dhar & Sons
Ganga Saran Vs. Civil Judge, Hapur, Ghaziabad & others
Hakam Devi and others Vs. Phuman Singh, Buta Singh
Indra Narayan Kundu Vs. Girindra Nath Mitra
Mool Chand Yadav & anr Vs. Raza Buland Sugar Co. Ltd. Rampur & ors
Ramchandra Ganpatrao Hande @ Handege Vs. Vithalrao Hande & ors
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.