SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 253

J. B. PARDIWALA, R. MAHADEVAN
Vellore District Environment Monitoring Committee Rep. By Its Secretary Mr. R. Rajebdran – Appellant
Versus
District Collector, Vellore District – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. T. Mohan, Sr. Adv. M/S. Mitter & Mitter Co., AOR Mr. Amit Gupta, Adv. Ms. Muskan Nagpal, Adv. Mr. Kshitij Vaibhav, Adv. Mr. Arun Singh, Adv. M/S. Shakil Ahmad Syed, AOR Mr. Syed Ahmed Saud, Adv. Mr. Mohd. Parvez Dabas, Adv. Mr. Daanish Ahmed Syed, Adv. Mr. Uzmi Jameel Husain, Adv. Mr. Aqib Baig, Adv. Mr. Mohd. Shakim, Adv. Mr. Mohd. Shahib, Adv.
For the Respondent(s): Mr. T. Mohan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Gautam Narayan, Sr. Adv. Ms. Asmita Singh, AOR Mr. Yogeshwaran, Adv. Mr. Abheet Mangleek, Adv. Mr. Tushar Nair, Adv. Mr. Anirudh Anand, Adv. Mr. Punishk Handa, Adv. Mr. Pradeep Misra, AOR M/S. Shakil Ahmad Syed, AOR Mr. Syed Ahmed Saud, Adv. Mr. Mohd. Parvez Dabas, Adv. Mr. Daanish Ahmed Syed, Adv. Mr. Uzmi Jameel Husain, Adv. Mr. Aqib Baig, Adv. Mr. Mohd. Shakim, Adv. Mr. Mohd. Shahib, Adv. Mr. Ghanshyam Joshi, AOR Mr. Saurabh Mishra, AOR Mr. Shrimay Mishra, Adv. Mr. Abhinav Pandey, Adv. Mr. Nirbhay Shankar Tiwari, Adv. Mr. M.f. Philip, Adv. Ms. Purnima Krishna, AOR Mr. Karamveer Singh Yadav, Adv.

JUDGMENT

R.MAHADEVAN, J.

Leave granted. Heard all the parties and also perused the materials placed before us, including status reports/affidavits/responses filed by them. For the sake of clarity and better understanding, this judgment has been divided into the following heads :

SL. NO.

HEADS

I

PREFATORY NOTE

II

RELIEF SOUGHT

III

FACTUAL OVERVIEW

A

GENESIS OF THE LITIGATION

B

VELLORE CITIZENS WELFARE FORUM CASE

C

AFTERMATH OF VELLORE CITIZENS WELFARE FORUM JUDGMENT

IV

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AND AFFIDAVITS/REPORTS FILED BY THE AUTHORITIES

V

CONTENTIONS OF THE PARTIES

VI

ANALYSIS

A

BASIC PRINCIPLES

B

POLLUTION CAUSED BY TANNERIES

C

CURRENT STATUS OF POLLUTION

D

LIABILITY TO PAY COMPENSATION

E

DEEMING FICTION AND PRECAUTIONARY

PRINCIPLE

F

DETERMINATION OF COMPENSATION

G

GOVERNMENT PAY PRINCIPLE VIS-À-VIS

RESPONSIBILITY OF THE GOVERNMENT

H

REDUCTION OF POLLUTION

I

PROVISIONS OF THE WATER ACT

VII

ECOCIDE

VIII

DISCUSSION AND FINDINGS

IX

CONCLUSION

X

RESULT AND DIRECTIVES

I. PREFATORY NOTE

2. Nature and its e

                          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                          1
                          2
                          3
                          4
                          5
                          6
                          7
                          8
                          9
                          10
                          11
                          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                          supreme today icon
                          logo-black

                          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                          Please visit our Training & Support
                          Center or Contact Us for assistance

                          qr

                          Scan Me!

                          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                          whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
                          whatsapp-icon Back to top