J. B. PARDIWALA, R. MAHADEVAN
Bhudev Mallick Alias Bhudeb Mallick – Appellant
Versus
Ranajit Ghoshal – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.
2. Exemption Application is allowed.
3. Leave granted.
4. This appeal arises from the order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Calcutta dated 23.09.2019 in CO. No. 3283 of 2019 by which the High Court rejected the CO filed by the appellants herein (judgment debtors) and thereby affirmed the order passed by the Executing Court dated 4.9.2019 in Title Execution Case No. 1 of 2017 arising out of Title Suit No. 25 of 1965.
5. For the sake of convenience, the appellants herein shall be referred to as the judgment debtors and the respondents herein shall be referred to as the decree holders.
6. The facts giving rise to this appeal may be summarised as under:
i. In 1965, the predecessor-in-interest of the decree holders herein instituted a Title Suit No. 25 of 1965 for confirmation of possession and in the alternative for recovery of possession based on title to the suit land and for permanent injunction. The respondents herein are the legal heirs of the original plaintiffs of the Title Suit No. 25 of 1965 referred to above. The Subordinate Judge 2nd Court, Hooghly decreed the suit vide the judgment and decree dated 26.06.197
Jai Dayal And Others v. Krishan Lal Garg and Another reported in (1996) 11 SCC 588 [Para 37]
Maga Ram And Another v. Kana Ram And Others reported in AIR 1993 Raj 208 [Para 38]
Shivamurthy Mahalingappa Kuchanaur v. Dannammadevi Cycle Mart, Rabakavi
The executing court must establish wilful disobedience of a decree before ordering detention; failure to do so constitutes a jurisdictional error.
(1) Failure to present written statement – Court is not supposed to pass a mechanical judgment invoking Rule 10 of Order VIII, CPC merely on the basis of plaint, upon failure of a defendant to file a....
Objection to execution of decree must be raised at appropriate stage.
The transferee of property can execute a decree without a separate assignment of the decree as per the amended provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
The executing court is bound by the decree's terms and cannot entertain objections that do not pertain to jurisdiction, even if the decree is allegedly erroneous.
The executing Court cannot go behind the decree and must execute it according to its tenor, and cannot entertain objections to the decree's correctness in law or on facts, unless it is a nullity or p....
The court affirmed that a decree holder's rights must be enforced despite repeated technical objections from judgment debtors, underscoring the importance of expeditious justice in civil matters.
A Judgment Debtor may raise jurisdictional objections against a decree in execution proceedings only if such objections are apparent on the record, not requiring examination of facts. An erroneous ex....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.