SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 610

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
B.V. NAGARATHNA, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, JJ.
Sh. Dayananda Saraswati Swamiji (Dead) & Ors. – Petitioners
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu & Ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition (C) No. 476 of 2012 With Writ Petition (C) No. 1432 of 2019 Writ Petition (C) No. 1147 of 2021 Writ Petition (C) No. 148 of 2024
Decided On : 01-04-2025

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s):Mr. K. R. Sasiprabhu, AOR Petitioner-in-person Mr. Vishesh Kanodia, Adv. Ms. Rashi Bansal, AOR Ms. Deepti Thapa, Adv. Mr. K. V. Muthu Kumar, AOR Ms. Sarita Kanwar, Adv. Mr. V. Chitambaresh, Sr. Adv. Mr. C. S. Vaidyanathan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Guru Krishnakumar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Suvidutt M.S., AOR Mr. Akshay Nagaraj, Adv. Ms. Deepika Singh, Adv. Ms. Disha Puri, Adv. Mr. Shikhar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rishesh Sikarwar, Adv. Mrs. Renu Yadav, Adv.
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Jaideep Gupta, Sr. Adv. Mr. R. Shunmugasundaram, Sr. Adv. Mr. N R Elango, Sr. Adv. Mr. Amit Anand Tiwari AAG, Sr. Adv. Ms. Misha Rohatgi, AOR Mr. N R R Arun Natarajan, Adv. Mr. Nakul Mohta, Adv. Mr. Amulya Upadhyay, Adv. Mr. Ayush Kashyap, Adv. Ms. Racheeta Chawla, Adv. Mr. Agilesh Kumar S, Adv. Mr. Agilely Kumar S, Adv. Ms. Tanvi Anand, Adv. Ms. Shakeena AG, Adv. Mr. Sravan Kumar Karanam, AOR Mr. Kumar Abhishek, Adv. Ms. P. Geetanjali, Adv. Mr. Aniket Singh, Adv. Mr. P. Venkatraju, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Singh Dingra, Adv. Mr. Sanjiv Kumar Jain, Adv. Mr. Amit Kumar Chawla, adv. Mr. Akhileshwar Jha, adv. Ms. Charan Jeet Sidhu, Adv. Mr. Dilip Kumar, Adv. Mr. G. N. Reddy, AOR Mr. Shyam Divan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Guntur Pramod Kumar, AOR Ms. Prerna Singh, Adv. Mr. Gautam Bhatia, Adv. Mr. Rongon Choudhary, Adv. Mr. Santosh Krishnan, AOR Mr. K.M.Nataraj, A.S.G. Mr. Aravindh S., AOR Mr. Aadithya Aravindh, Adv. Mr. Sravan Kumar Karanam, AOR Mr. Kumar Abhishek, Adv. Ms. P. Geetanjali, Adv. Mr. Aniket Singh, Adv. Mr. P. Venkatraju, Adv. Mr. Rajiv Kumar Choudhry , AOR Mr. S. Prabu Ramasubramanian, Adv. Mr. Raghunatha Sethupathy B, AOR Mr. Manoj Kumar A., Adv.

The Supreme Court directed petitioners to approach respective State High Courts for challenging provisions of various Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Acts, emphasizing the distinct nature of the Acts.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 25, 26, 31(1)(a)(b) - Challenge to various provisions of the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959, Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987, and Pondicherry Act, 1972 - Petitioners sought declarations of certain sections as ultra vires the Constitution. (Paras 1-2)

(B) Jurisdiction - The court found that the petitioners should approach the respective State High Courts for redressal of grievances regarding the provisions of the Acts, as the schemes may be distinct. (Paras 4-5)

(C) Disposition - The court disposed of the writ petitions while reserving liberty for petitioners to file petitions before the respective High Courts. (Paras 6-9)

Findings of Court:
The court emphasized the need for High Courts to appreciate the challenges in light of socio-economic, cultural, and historical aspects.

Issues: The main issue was whether the provisions of the Acts could be challenged in the Supreme Court or should be addressed in the respective State High Courts.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the distinct nature of the Acts warranted that grievances be addressed in the respective High Courts for a more effective resolution.

Result: Writ petitions disposed of.

ORDER :

The petitioners in each of these writ petitions which were filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India have sought the following reliefs:

    “WRIT PETITION (C) NO.476/2012

    (i) declare that the Section 3(1), 3(4), 23, 24, 26, 32, 35, 36, 36-A, 36-B, 43-A, 45, 47, 49, 49-B, 50, 54 (1), 63, Sections 71-76, 92,97, 108 and 111 of the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 Act as being ultra vires Articles 14, 19 (1)(g), 25, 26 and 31 (1)(a)(b) of the Constitution of India.

    (ii) declare that the Sections 8, 12, 13, 15, 17-19 & 22, 25, 29, 41, 49, 51-55, 66, 70 and 87 of the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987 [(Act 30 of 1987) as being ultra vires Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 25, 26 and 31 (1)(a)(b) of the Constitution of India.

    (iii) declare that the Sections 3A, 4, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of the Pondicherry Act, 1972 as being ultra vires Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 25, 26 and 31 (1)(a)(b) of the Constitution of lndia.

    (iv) that pending the hearing and final disposal of the Writ Petition, the Respondents by themselves, their servants and agents be restrained from acting in furtherance of the impugned Section 3(1), 3(4), 23, 24, 26, 32, 35, 36, 36-A, 36-B, 43-A, 45, 47, 49, 49-B, 50, 54(1), 63, Sections 71-76, 92,97, 108 and 111 of the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 Act.

    (v) that pending the hearing and final disposal of the Writ Petition, the Respondents by themselves, their servants and agents be restrained from acting in furtherance of the impugned Section 8, 12, 13, 15, 17-19 & 22, 25, 29, 41, 49, 51-55, 66, 70 and 87 of the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987 [(Act 30 of 1987).

    (vi) that pending the hearing and final disposal of the Writ Petition, the Respondents by themselves, their servants and agents be restrained from acting in furtherance of the impugned Sections 3A, 4, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of the Pondicherry Act, 1972

    (vii) that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to pass such other as may be deemed fit in the facts and circumstances of the case.

    WRIT PETITION (C) NO.1432/2019

    i. Issue a writ in the nature of certiorari in quashing Sections 1(3), 3, 23, 24, 25-A, 26, 27, 34, 34A, 34B, 34C, 34D, 35, 36, 45, 47, 48, 49, 49-B, 50, 52, 53, 54, 56(2), 57, 58, 59, 61, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 69, 70, 71-76 (including 75A, 75B and 75C), 92, 97, 108 and 111 of the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 be declared ultra vires Articles 14, 19, 25, 26, 29, and 31A of the Constitution of India; and

    ii. Issue a writ in the nature of certiorari and quash the Utilization of Surplus Funds Rules (G.O. Ms. No. 4524, Revenue, dated the 5th November, 1960) framed under Section 36 of the Act as being unconstitutional; and

    iii. Issue a writ in the nature of certiorari and quash the Conditions for Appointment of Executive Officers Rules, 2015 (G.O. Ms. No. 260, Tourism, Culture and Religious Endowments (RE4-2), dated 6th November 2015) framed under Sections 43A and 45 of the Act as being unconstitutional; and

    iv. Issue a writ in the nature of certiorari and quash the Appointment of Auditors Rules (G.O. Ms. No. 3029, Revenue, dated the 20th July 1961) framed under Section 87 of the Act as being ultra vires the Act; and

    v. Issue a writ in the nature of certiorari and quash the appointment of Executive Officers made under Section 45 for the Tiruchendur Temple and the other major Temples such as Sri Kantimatisameta Sri Nellaiappar Temple, Tirunelveli, Sri Arthanareeswarar Temple, Tiruchengode, Sri Kallazhagar Temple, Azhagarkoil and Sri Kothandaramaswamy Temple, Vaduvurto which such appointments were made with effect from July 16, 1966 under Sections 75-A and 75-B of the Act; and

    vi. Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus and direct an investigation by a Special Investigation Team headed by an officer of high integrity such as Shri A.G.PonManickavel IPS, IG (Idol Theft Wing) of Tamil Nadu, in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top