Back
M. M. SUNDRESH, RAJESH BINDAL
Ravi – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. accusation of criminal offenses (Para 2) |
| 2. set aside impugned order due to ongoing civil suit (Para 3) |
| 3. granting of anticipatory bail and conclusion (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
ORDER :
2. The appellant has been accused of committing offences punishable under Sections 120B, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860.
4. Considering the above, the impugned order stands set aside. The appellant is granted anticipatory bail, subject to the terms and conditions that may be imposed by the Trial Court as it deems fit for the purpose.
6. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
Anticipatory bail granted due to the appellant's cooperation in the investigation, negating the need for custodial interrogation.
The court granted anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code, emphasizing the need for cooperation in the investigation while addressing the validity of serious allegations.
Custodial interrogation not required for bail in anticipation of arrest under specific legal circumstances.
Anticipatory bail can be granted when custodial interrogation is not necessary, considering the nature of allegations and cooperation from the applicant.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
