1. Charges under Sections 302, 120B, 201, 341, 34 IPC and Sections 25, 27 Arms Act for facilitating the main accused's escape and providing subsequent aid. (Para 2 , 3 )
Back
Next 
2025 Supreme(SC) 52
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
M.M. SUNDRESH, ARAVIND KUMAR, JJ.
Kedar Singh – Appellant
VERSUS
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 67 of 2025 (@ SLP(CRL.) No.14739 of 2024)
Decided On : 03-01-2025
Important Points
Prolonged incarceration and hostile witness testimony can justify granting bail to an accused.
Subject
Criminal Law - Bail
Act Referred
Headnote
(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 302, 120B, 201, 341, 34 - Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25 and 27 - The appellant was accused of facilitating the escape of the main accused and aiding him thereafter. The co-accused was granted bail, and most witnesses turned hostile. The appellant has been in custody for over two years. (Paras 2-4)
(B) Bail - The court considered the circumstances of the case, including the prolonged incarceration of the appellant and the status of co-accused, leading to the decision to grant bail. (Paras 5-6)
Findings of Court:
The impugned order is set aside, and bail is granted to the appellant with conditions as determined by the Trial Court.
Issues: The main issue was whether the appellant should be granted bail considering the circumstances of the case.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the prolonged incarceration and the status of co-accused warranted the granting of bail.
Result: Appeal allowed.
(B) Bail - The court considered the circumstances of the case, including the prolonged incarceration of the appellant and the status of co-accused, leading to the decision to grant bail. (Paras 5-6)
Findings of Court:
The impugned order is set aside, and bail is granted to the appellant with conditions as determined by the Trial Court.
Issues: The main issue was whether the appellant should be granted bail considering the circumstances of the case.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the prolonged incarceration and the status of co-accused warranted the granting of bail.
Result: Appeal allowed.
Legal Category Hierarchy
Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Abhishek Amritanshu, AOR Mr. Sanchit Guru, Adv. Mr. Rahul Narang, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Amritanshu, AOR
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Vinayak Sharma, Standing Counsel, Adv. Mr. Ravinder Kumar Yadav, AOR
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Abhishek Amritanshu, AOR Mr. Sanchit Guru, Adv. Mr. Rahul Narang, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Amritanshu, AOR
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Vinayak Sharma, Standing Counsel, Adv. Mr. Ravinder Kumar Yadav, AOR
Table of Contents
2. Request for bail based on the grant of bail to co-accused, witnesses turning hostile, and the duration of incarceration. (Para 4 )
3. Consideration of co-accused's bail status, the hostile nature of examined witnesses, and the appellant's period of incarceration exceeding two years. (Para 4 )
4. Bail may be granted when co-accused are released, material witnesses turn hostile, and the accused has undergone significant incarceration. (Para 4 , 5 )
5. Impugned order set aside and bail granted to the appellant subject to conditions imposed by the Trial Court. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 )
6. What factors justify the grant of bail in the present case?
The court granted bail based on the co-accused receiving bail, the fact that most examined witnesses turned hostile, and the appellant's incarceration for over two years. (Para 4 )
ORDER
1. Leave granted.
2. The appellant has been arraigned as an accused for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 120B, 201, 341, 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 25 and 27 of the Arms Act, 1959.
3. The case against the appellant is that he facilitated the main accused’s escape from the scene of the occurrence and aided him thereafter.
4. We have been informed that the co-accused has been granted bail and most of the examined witnesses have turned hostile. The appellant is also under incarceration for more than two years.
5. Considering the above, we are inclined to set aside the impugned order and grant bail to the appellant.
6. Accordingly, the impugned order stands set aside and the appellant is granted bail, subject to the terms and conditions that may be imposed by the Trial Court.
7. The appeal is allowed accordingly.
8. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
