SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1548

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
PANKAJ MITHAL AND S.V.N. BHATTI, JJ.
Aryan Goel – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Punjab – Respondent
Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Criminal) No. 1415 of 2025
Decided on : 05-05-2025

Headnote:(A) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 438 - Petitioner sought pre-arrest bail which was denied by the High Court - Interim protection from arrest granted by this Court while entertaining special leave petition - Petitioner appeared before Investigating Officer, complying with directions - Court held that interim protection should be made absolute. (Paras 3-5)

(B) Cooperation with the investigation is a relevant factor in determining the granting of pre-arrest bail - Such cooperation can justify the continuance of interim protection from arrest in pending investigations. (Paras 4-5)

Facts of the case:
The High Court rejected the petitioner's application for pre-arrest bail. The petitioner was granted interim protection from arrest by the Supreme Court and was observed to be cooperating with the investigation.

Findings of Court:
The petitioner is entitled to protection from arrest as long as they continue to cooperate with the investigation.

Issues: The primary issue addressed was whether the interim protection from arrest should be made absolute based on the petitioner's cooperation with the investigation.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that continued cooperation with the investigation supports the maintenance of interim protection against arrest.

Result: Petition disposed of, with direction for no arrest, provided the petitioner cooperates with the investigation.

Table of Content
1. pre-arrest bail application and interim protection details. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. court's assessment of cooperation in investigation. (Para 4)
3. final order regarding arrest and application dispositions. (Para 5 , 6)

ORDER :

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The application seeking pre-arrest bail of the petitioner was rejected by the High Court.

3. This Court vide order dated 27.01.2025 while entertaining the present special leave petition has granted interim protection i.e., the petitioner shall not be arrested in connection with the FIR No.0167 of 2024 dated 31.07.2024. In pursuance to the aforesaid order and the subsequent orders passed by this Court, the petitioner has appeared before the Investigating Officer on 28th April, 2025, as directed by this Court as also on the subsequent dates, which on verification are found to be true.

4. We are of the opinion that as the petitioner is cooperating and participating with the investigation, the interim protection granted by this Court vide order dated 27.01.2025 deserves to be made absolute.

5. Accordingly, the present special leave petition is disposed of with the direction that the petitioner shall not be arrested in connection with FIR No.0167 of 2024 dated 31.07.2024 registered with Police Station Division No.6, District-Police Commissionerate, Ludhiana, provided the petitioner continues to cooperate and participate with the investigation as well as the subsequent trial.

6. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top