SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1612

MANMOHAN, DIPANKAR DATTA
Tarun Kumar Majhi – Appellant
Versus
State Of West Bengal – Respondent


Table of Content
1. appeal regarding vehicle release due to prior acquittal. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. arguments on vehicle bond and value. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
3. court’s view on vehicle confiscation procedure. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
4. final order on appeal and vehicle. (Para 16)

ORDER :

1. Leave granted.

2. Present appeal has been filed by the Appellant challenging the impugned judgment and order dated 15th July, 2024 passed by the High Court at Calcutta in C.R.R. No.1439 of 2021 by which the High Court directed furnishing of a surety bond of Rs.6,00,000/- (Rupees Six Lakhs) for release of the vehicle i.e. Hyundai X-cent belonging to the Appellant.

3. It is pertinent to mention that the aforesaid vehicle owned by the Appellant-advocate was seized in 2017 in connection with investigation of a case registered with Nandanghat P.S. Case No.180 of 2017 on 15th July, 2017 under Sections 20 (b)(ii)(C) and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short 'NDPS Act').

4. Though the name of the Appellant was initially mentioned in the First Information Report ('FIR') but after culmination of investigation, he was discharged from the said case on the basis of spec

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top