AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA
Sankar Padam Thapa – Appellant
Versus
Vijaykumar Dineshchandra Agarwal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH, J.
Leave granted.
2. The question for consideration in the instant appeal is as to whether in the absence of a Trust being made an accused in a complaint under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘NI Act’), when a Cheque has been issued on behalf of a Trust, the said complaint would be maintainable against the Chairman/a Trustee of the said Trust?
THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT:
3. The instant appeal arises from the Final Judgment and Order dated 21.11.2022 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Impugned Judgment’) [2022 SCC OnLine Megh 624| (2023) 1 GauLT 344], passed by a learned Single Judge of the High Court of Meghalaya, Shillong (hereinafter referred to as the ‘High Court’) in Criminal Petition No.31/2019, wherein the High Court quashed and set aside the proceedings in Criminal Case No.44(S)/2019 pending before the Court of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Shillong (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Trial Court’) and the Summoning Order dated 11.02.2019 passed against the Respondent.
4. The William Carey University (hereinafter referred to as the ‘University’), a recognized Private University, owned and sponsored by the Agriculture
[2022 SCC OnLine Megh 624 | (2023) 1 GLT 344 | 2022 Supreme(Megh) 89] – Referred.
Pratibha Pratisthan v Manager, Canara Bank
Duli Chand v M/s M P T C Charitable Trust
V Chandrasekaran v Venkatanaicker Trust
Narayana Iyer v Anandammal Adheena Trust
Kansara Abdulrehman Sadruddin v Trustees of the Maniar Jamat Ahmedabad
Vijay Sports Club v State of Bengal
SMS Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v Neeta Bhalla
Sunita Palita v Panchami Stone Quarry
D Purushotama Reddy v K Sateesh
Pranab Jyoti Dutta v Chief Branch Manager, SBI
Prana Educational and Charitable Trust v State of Kerala
Dadasaheb Rawal Co-op. Bank of Dondaicha Ltd. V Ramesh s/o Jawrilal Jain
Mukund s/o Manohar Wazalwar v Eknath s/o Bajirao Hatwar (Dead) through his L.R. Durwas Eknath Hatwar
Bijaya Manjari Satpathy v State of Orissa
Abraham Memorial Educational Trust v Suresh Babu
S P Mani and Mohan Dairy v Dr Snehalatha Elangovan
Chikkamuniyappa Memorial Trust v State
National Insurance Company Limited v Pranay Sethi
Union Territory of Ladakh v Jammu and Kashmir National Conference
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.