SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1879

SANJAY KUMAR, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA
Lancor Holdings Limited – Appellant
Versus
Prem Kumar Menon – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Dr. A.M. Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Siddharth Bhatnagar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Amol Chitale, Adv. Mr. Kalyani Bhide Gharote, Adv. Ms. Shrika Gautam, Adv. Mr. Yuvraj Kashyap, Adv. Mr. Nadeem Afroz, Adv. Ms. Shweta Singh Parihar, Adv. Mr. Sarthak Sharma, Adv. Mrs. Pragya Baghel, AOR
For the Respondent(s): Mr. C. A. Sundaram, Sr. Adv. Mr. M. Gireesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Ankur S. Kulkarni, AOR Mr. Sanjay Singh, Adv. Mr. Tarun, Adv. Mr. P.B. Suresh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Vipin Nair, AOR Mr. Udayaditya Banerjee, Adv. Mr. Aditya Narendranath, Adv. Mr. P B Sashaankh, Adv. Ms. M.B. Ramya, Adv. Ms. Deeksha Gupta, Adv. Ms. Puspita Basak, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

SANJAY KUMAR, J

1. Two questions arise for consideration in these appeals: -

    (i) What is the effect of undue and unexplained delay in the pronouncement of an arbitral award upon its validity?

    (ii) Is an arbitral award that is unworkable, in terms of not settling the disputes between the parties finally while altering their positions irrevocably thereby leaving them no choice but to initiate further litigation, liable to be set aside on grounds of perversity, patent illegality and being opposed to the public policy of India? If so, would it be a fit case for exercise of jurisdiction under Article 142 of the Constitution?

In this case, the learned Arbitrator reserved his arbitral award on 28.07.2012 but pronounced it only on 16.03.2016, i.e., nearly three years and eight months later, with no definite resolution of the matter. Significantly, no explanation worth the name was offered by him for the delay.

2. The issue of delay in the delivery of an arbitral award is relevant now only in the context of the period prior to insertion of Section 29A in the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, ‘the Act of 1996’), which put in place stringent timelines for passing of an

              Click Here to Read the rest of this document
              1
              2
              3
              4
              5
              6
              7
              8
              9
              10
              11
              SupremeToday Portrait Ad
              supreme today icon
              logo-black

              An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

              Please visit our Training & Support
              Center or Contact Us for assistance

              qr

              Scan Me!

              India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

              For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

              whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
              whatsapp-icon Back to top