SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
B.V. NAGARATHNA, UJJAL BHUYAN, JJ.
Canara Bank – Appellant
Versus
Kavita Chowdhary – Respondent
Civil Appeal No. 2587 of 2025 with Civil Appeal No. 2588 of 2025
Decided On : 15-04-2026
Key Points: - The Court held that there was deficiency in service by the bank in presenting two cheques within their validity period, leading to loss to the complainants (!) . - Compensation awarded by the Commission was modified to 6 percent of the total cheque amount to each complainant, with interest from filing, and no cost awarded; rest of the order not interfered with (!) (!) (!) (!) . - Legal framework discussed includes NI Act provisions on presentment, delay, and Section 138 conditions, as well as consumer protection definitions of service and deficiency; and application to banking services (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) .
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of appeals and commission's decision. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. facts regarding complainant's cheque deposits. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. complaints sent after cheque issues. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 4. appellant’s defense and responses. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 5. arguments by both parties regarding liability. (Para 21 , 22) |
| 6. court considerations and analysis of evidence. (Para 23 , 24) |
| 7. statutory provisions relevant to the case. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 8. understanding key statutory obligations. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 9. consumer protection legal framework. (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43) |
| 10. deficiency and compensation principles. (Para 44 , 45 , 46 , 47) |
| 11. proceedings and legal liabilities. (Para 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52) |
| 12. court's findings on negligence and service. (Para 53 , 54 , 55) |
| 13. criteria for determining reasonable time. (Para 56 , 57 , 58 , 59) |
| 14. final determination on liability. (Para 60 , 61) |
| 15. assessment of compensation. (Para 62 , 63 , 70 , 72) |
| 16. final judgments and orders. (Para 73 , 74 , 75) |
JUDGMENT :
UJJAL BHUYAN, J.
1. Facts and issue in both the civil appeals being identical, those were heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment and order.
2. The two appeals have been preferred by the Canara Bank (‘appellant or bank’ hereinafter) under Section 23 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986/ Section 67 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 assailing the judgment and order dated 24.09.2024 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi (briefly ‘the Commission’ hereinafter) allowing Consumer Complaint No. 123 of 2019 (Kavita Chowdhary vs. Canara Bank) and Consumer Complaint No. 124 of 2019 (Priya Chowdhary vs. Canara Bank).
3. It may be mentioned that vide the impugned judgment and order dated 24.09.2024, the Commission has allowed the aforesaid two complaints by directing the appellant bank to pay 10 percent of the total cheque amount alongwith interest at the rate of 8 percent per annum from the date of filing of the complaints within two months, further imposing litigation cost of Rs. 50,000.00 in favour of each of the complainants. The Commission has clarified that any delay in making the payment by the appellant bank would result in enhanced interest at the rate of 10 percent per annum till the date of final realisation.
4. For the sake of easy reference, we may refer to the facts of the first appeal i.e. Civil Appeal No. 2587/2025 (Canara Bank vs. Kavita Chowdhary). This appeal arises out of Consumer Complaint No. 123 of 2019 (Kavita Chowdhary vs. Canara Bank).
5. Respondent Kavita Chowdhary had filed Consumer Complaint No. 123 of 2019 before the Commission under Section 21 (a)(i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 alleging deficiency in service on the part of the appellant and seeking compensation alongwith interest. Prayer made in the complaint was as under:
(i) To pass necessary order directing the opposite party to pay Rs. 1,06,10,768.00 (Rupees one crore six lakhs ten thousand seven hundred sixty eight) to the complainant alongwith interest at the rate of 18 percent per annum.
(ii) To direct the opposite party to pay Rs. 25,00,000.00 (Rupees twenty five lakh) to the complainant towards interest/compensation/damages.
6. Complainant i.e. Kavita Chowdhary holds a savings bank account with the appellant at its Maharani Bagh (Ashram Chowk) Branch, New Delhi, the account number being 0349101015565. On 29.05.2018, she (respondent-complainant) had deposited two CTS cheques into this savings bank account, the details of which are as under:
(i) Cheque No. 46382 dated 03.03.2018 for Rs. 11,36,868.00.
(ii) Cheque No. 46381 dated 03.03.2018 for Rs. 94,73,900.00.
7. Both the aforesaid cheques were issued in favour of the respondent by Assotech Limited and drawn on Vijaya Bank, S.S.I. Branch, Noida.
8. Appellant credited the two cheque amounts into the aforesaid savings bank account of the respondent on 01.06.2018. The transacti
AI
Bank's failure to present deposited cheques timely constituted deficiency in service, necessitating a recalibration of awarded compensation to ensure reasonableness and justice for the consumer.
Banking services – Deficiency in service – Manifest deficiency in service on part of OP/Bank in dealing with cheques delivered by complainants, which could not have been encashed as same had become s....
Banks are liable for negligence in safeguarding customers' cheques, leading to compensation for misappropriated funds.
Presumption under NI Act S.139 arises on cheque issuance admission; rebuttable by preponderance via evidence, not S.313 statement. Security cheques liable if debt unpaid; 'account closed' dishonour a....
A bank must honor cheques against sufficient funds; failure constitutes negligence and allows for damages under the Consumer Protection Act.
Banks must adhere strictly to RBI guidelines regarding cheque processing to avoid claims of deficiency in service.
Admission of cheque issuance triggers Section 139 presumption of debt discharge, rebuttable only by probable defence on preponderance of probabilities; uncorroborated security claim fails rebuttal; r....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.