SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, PINKI
S. B. A. Services – Appellant
Versus
ICICI Bank Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainant:Mrs. Amna Darakhshan Advocate
For the Opp. Parties:Mr. Shivang Jain, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Sangita Dhingra Sehgal, President—The present Complaint has been filed by the by the Complainant before this Commission alleging deficiency in service on part of the Opposite Party-bank and has prayed for the following:—

“1. Direct the Opposite Parties to pay a compensation of Rs.98,00,000/- on account of loss incurred by the Complainant Firm due to cancellation of two agreements as mentioned in paragraph No.7 & 18 above;

2. Direct the Opposite Parties to pay litigation expenses to the Complainant;

3. Also direct the Opposite Parties to pay pendente lite and future interest to the Complainant on the amount of claim and;

4. Any other and further order(s)/direction (s) which this Hon’ble Commission may deem fit and proper may also be passed in favour of the Complainant and against the Opposite Party, in the interest of justice.”

2. Brief facts necessary for adjudication of the present Complaint are that the Complainant is a registered Firm having its office at B-291, Nandni Kunj, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, being the business of manpower supply service. The Complainant-firm has its current account bearing No.003705500370 in Opposite Party No.1-ICICI bank having its bran

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top