DIPANKAR DATTA, AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH
State of Odisha – Appellant
Versus
Sreepati Ranjan Dash – Respondent
JUDGMENT
DIPANKAR DATTA, J.
THE APPEALS
1. These two appeals, by special leave, at the instance of the common appellant — State of Odisha1 [State] — are directed against the common judgment and order dated 7th November, 20252 [impugned order] passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Orissa3 [High Court], dismissing two intra-court appeals4 [W.A. No.658 of 2023 and W.A. No.744 of 2023] that the State had carried from final orders dated 24th February, 2023 and 28th February, 2023 of a Single Judge allowing the writ petitions5 [W.P.(C) No.35645 of 2021 and W.P.(C) No.41042 of 2021] of the two respondents before this Court, viz. Sreepati Ranjan Dash6 [Dash] and Aditya Bhanjan Sahoo7[Sahoo], finding no infirmity therein.
FACTUAL MATRIX
2. The basic facts giving rise to the impugned orders, though uncontested, have a history of their own. To the extent germane for disposal of the present appeals, the same are adverted to briefly hereafter.
a. On 17th November 1981, the Commerce & Transport (Transport) Department, Government of Odisha issued an executive instruction (bearing No.17315) 8[Executive Instructions] for recruitment to/filling up 4 posts of Assistant Regional Transport Office
Dr. Sharmad vs. State of Kerala
Shankarshan Dash vs. Union of India & Ors
Union of Inda v. Arulmozhi Iniarasu
N. Ramachandra Reddy v. State of Telangana
Management of Narendra & Company v. Workmen of Narendra & Company
Union of India v. Glaxo India Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.