Back
ORISSA HIGH COURT
KUANR HEMBRAM – Appellant
Versus
OAT BBSR – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
KRISHNA S. DIXIT, J.
The State & private parties are invoking the writ jurisdiction of this Court for assailing two orders dated 21.01.2014 & 13.05.2014 entered by the Orissa Administrative Tribunal in O.A. No.383 of 2013 & O.A. No.677 of 2013. By these orders, the following relief has been granted to the answering Opposite Parties, i.e. Bibhu Prasad Mishra & Rasmi Rekha Tripathy, as under:
"In O.A. No.383/2013:
In view of the above, the respondent authorities are directed to convene a review DPC for consideration of the case of the applicant if he comes within the zone of consideration in respect of the remaining 58 vacancies along with other similarly situated persons belonging to Orissa Subordinate Finance Service cadre (ACTO) as per their ratio for their promotion to the cadre of Orissa Taxation & Accounts Service, within a period of two months from the date of communication of this order and if the decision of the DPC goes in favour of the applicant, give him promotion from the date the candidates who were promoted as per the recommendation of the DPC dated 22.12.2012.
However, it need not be said that since the applicant is not working in the promotional post, even thou
Writ jurisdiction maintains that promotions must reflect the existing cadre strength at DPC meetings, invalidating limits set by prior requisition dates.
Promotion processes under service rules must consider both existing and anticipated vacancies, ensuring all eligible candidates are fairly assessed for their rightful place, while no financial benefi....
Promotion processes must adhere to established guidelines, ensuring fair consideration for all eligible candidates. Clubbing of vacancies across years violates process integrity, and resultant promot....
The eligibility for promotion and consideration in DPCs is determined by the rules prevalent at the time of consideration, and vacancies are not to be filled invariably by the law existing on the dat....
The court affirmed that executive instructions regarding promotions remain effective for cases initiated before new rules, emphasizing the need for eligibility consideration based on existing rules a....
A review application can only succeed on grounds available at initial adjudication; new developments post-decision do not constitute sufficient grounds for review.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
