P.S.NARAYANA
Chanumuri Subhaveni – Appellant
Versus
Sappa Srinivasa Rao – Respondent
( 1 ) SAPPA Srinivas, as minor represented by next friend Randhi ayyanna, the maternal grandfather, instituted the suit for partition as indigent person i. e. , O. P. No. 59/92 which was numbered as o. S. No. 78/94 on the file of Senior Civil judge, Tadepallegudem. The said minor was declared as major and next friend was discharged as per order in IA No. 593/ 2000 dated 19/7/2000. On the respective pleadings of the parties, issues were settled and PW-1 - next friend, PW-2 -Buddala ramanna, PW-3 - the plaintiff, were examined and Exs. A-1 to A-9 were marked. Likewise, DW-1 to DW-10 were examined and Exs. B-1 to B-10 were marked. The court of first instance granted a preliminary decree for partition holding that the alienations are not binding on the shares of the plaintiff and the 3rd defendant on 11-9-2000. Aggrieved by the said judgment and decree the alienees/defendants 4 to 9 preferred a. S. No. 111/2001 on the file of I Additional district Judge, West Godavari, Eluru and the appellate Court dismissed the said appeal by Judgment and decree dated 16-7-2002. Aggrieved by the same, the present second appeal is filed.
( 2 ) NO doubt, the report of the commissioner
Amarendra Mansingh v. Sanatansingh
Appalaswami v. Suryanarayanamurti
B. Ranga Rao (died) v. G. Venkata Krishna Rao
Bal Gangadhar Tilak v. Srinivas
Banga Chandra v. Jagat Kishore
Commissioner of Income Tax, Calcutta v. Paharpur Cooling Towers Private Limited
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.