B.S.A.SWAMY, G.YETHIRAJULU
John Clements – Appellant
Versus
All Concerned – Respondent
( 1 ) THESE appeals are directed against the order of the family Court, Hyderabad dated 31-5-2002 in O. P. No. 604 of 2001 dismissing the petition filed by the appellants for appointment of appellants in C. M. A. No. 2009 of 2002 as guardians of a minor girl under Sections 7 to 10 and 26 of the Guardians and Wards act, 1890 to permit them to take her to the United States of America (USA) and to adopt her as per the laws prevailing in usa.
( 2 ) THE appellants in C. M. A. No. 2009 of 2002 are the petitioners 2 and 3 and (P. 2 and P. 3) the appellant in C. M. A. (SR) no. 11727 of 2002 is the 1st petitioner (P. 1 ). The respondents 1 to 4 (R. 1 to R. 4) herein are the respondents in the petition. Since both the appeals arise out of the same order, they are clubbed and this common order is passed.
( 3 ) THE averments of the petition are briefly as under: The first petitioner is a society registered under the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Public Societies Act, 1350 fasli (Act 1 of 1350 Fasli ). The Government of India recognized the first petitioner as an agency for processing inter-country adoption and filing of applications before the competent Court. P. 2 and P.
Bakul Cashew Co. v. S.T.Officer, Quilon
Bhagirath v. Delhi Administration
Hindalco Industries Ltd. v. Union of India
Krishan Pakkanth v. Govt. of Kerala
Lakshmi Kanth Pandey v. Union of India
Manju Bha ia v. New Delhi Municipal Council
Municipal board, Pratabgarh v. M.S. Chawla
Rashpal Malhotra v. Satya Rajput
State (Delhi Administration) v. Puran Mai
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.