SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 656

B.S.A.SWAMY, G.YETHIRAJULU
John Clements – Appellant
Versus
All Concerned – Respondent


G. YETHIRAJULU, J.

( 1 ) THESE appeals are directed against the order of the family Court, Hyderabad dated 31-5-2002 in O. P. No. 604 of 2001 dismissing the petition filed by the appellants for appointment of appellants in C. M. A. No. 2009 of 2002 as guardians of a minor girl under Sections 7 to 10 and 26 of the Guardians and Wards act, 1890 to permit them to take her to the United States of America (USA) and to adopt her as per the laws prevailing in usa.

( 2 ) THE appellants in C. M. A. No. 2009 of 2002 are the petitioners 2 and 3 and (P. 2 and P. 3) the appellant in C. M. A. (SR) no. 11727 of 2002 is the 1st petitioner (P. 1 ). The respondents 1 to 4 (R. 1 to R. 4) herein are the respondents in the petition. Since both the appeals arise out of the same order, they are clubbed and this common order is passed.

( 3 ) THE averments of the petition are briefly as under: The first petitioner is a society registered under the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Public Societies Act, 1350 fasli (Act 1 of 1350 Fasli ). The Government of India recognized the first petitioner as an agency for processing inter-country adoption and filing of applications before the competent Court. P. 2 and P.











































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top