SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 1509

P.S.NARAYANA
Lagudu Anuradha – Appellant
Versus
Gorrepotu chellayyamma – Respondent


P. S. NARAYANA, J.

( 1 ) THE rival parties to the present lis are represented by Sri G. Rama gopal and Sri Gudapati Venkateswar Rao. The said learned Counsel representing the respective parties made submissions at length virtually touching all the questions involved in the present lis. The simple question in controversy between the parties is the order impugned ordering recounting of votes in E. O. P. No. 60/2001 on the file of Election Tribunal/senior Civil Judge, vizianagaram.

( 2 ) SMT. LAGUDU Anuradha, revision petitioner is 1st respondent in E. O. P. No. 60/ 2001 aforesaid and 1st respondent herein gorrepotu Chellayyamma is the petitioner in the said E. O. P. In E. O. P. No. 60/2001 the relief prayed for at Para-6 reads as hereunder:a. Declaring that the Election of the 1st respondent as Member of Z. P. T. C. of Jani z. P. T. C. as null and void and also invalid;b. Declaring that the petitioner is duly elected member of Jami Z. P. T. C. by ordering re- counting of the ballot papers;the pleadings of the respective parties need not be elaborately dealt with in the present context. At Para-5 of the impugned order, the Election Tribunal framed the following Point for consideration







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top