SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(AP) 1533

P.S.NARAYANA
Kaligotla Suryanarayana Murthy – Appellant
Versus
P. V. Ramanaiah – Respondent


P. S. NARAYANA, J.

( 1 ) THE respondent in the Civil Revision petition filed under Section 22 of A. P. Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control act, 1960, in short referred to as "act" hereinafter, is the landlord and the petitioner in R. C. C. No. 1/93 on the file of Rent Controller-District Munsif, bheemunipatnam. The Revision Petitioners are tenants and the legal representatives of the tenants since certain parties died pending litigation.

( 2 ) FOR the purpose of convenience, the parties will be referred to as "landlord" and "tenants".

( 3 ) THE landlord filed R. C. C. No. 1/93 as petitioner in the said R. C. C. seeking the relief of eviction of the tenants pleading in the eviction petition as follows: the petitioner herein is the owner of the petition schedule property for which he has been regularly paying the taxes on the property to the Bheemunipatnam municipality under Assessment No. 259 and the said schedule building was given on lease under a registered lease deed dated 1-7-1940 to one Kaligotla Suryanarayana on a monthly rent of Rs. 2. 13 annas and in or about 1974, the said Suryanarayana died and the respondents herein being the legal heirs of the deceased attorned












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top