Karnataka HC Notices Sri Lankan Judge's Rights Plea
07 Mar 2026
Karnataka Proposes Social Media Ban for Under-16s
07 Mar 2026
Justice Dharmadhikari Sworn In as 55th Madras HC Chief Justice
07 Mar 2026
Punjab HC Acquits Ram Rahim in Journalist Murder
07 Mar 2026
Appellate Courts Can Rely on Unexhibited Public Documents Produced by Plaintiff: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Under Section 100 CPC
07 Mar 2026
Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
P.RAMACHANDRA RAJU
Jagannadha Rao – Appellant
Versus
Y. Subba Rao – Respondent
JAGANNADHA RAO, J.
( 1 ) THIS is an assignee-decreeholders appeal preferred under Order 21, rule 103, C. P. C. (as amended) against an order made by the learned 5th Additional judge, City Civil Court, Hyd. in e A No. 60/82 filed under Order 21, Rule 97, C P C. in E P No. 6/80 in 0 S No. 121/70. while allowing E A No. 60/82, the trial Judge considered it. a fit case in which a surveyor should be sent to demarcate S No. 148 and also S Nos. 150/1 and 2 after showing the boundaries by the surveyor of s No. 148 with the aid of the village plan of Shaikpet village, the possession of the schedule mentioned property in s No. 148 is to be given to the decree holders by removing any obstruction in it. I feel in the circumstances the petition is to be allowed, ordering the surveyor to demarcate S No. 150/1 and 2 and also S No. 148 and show the boundaries to the bailiff. "
( 2 ) THE main grievance of the assignee-decree-holders is that though E. A. No. 60/82 was allowed in their favour, the aforesaid directions given by the learned trail Judge have
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Venkataseshayya Vs. Virayya
-
Read summaryGendalal Vs. Hazarilal
-
Read summaryJ. Ramanuj Vs. Lakshmi Narayana
-
Read summaryMohan Ram Vs. T L Sundaramier
-
Read summaryGHANCHI LAXMICHAND AMBARAM Vs TULSIDAS MADHAVDAS
-
Read summaryC.Ramaiah Vs Mohammadunnisa Begum
-
Read summaryKEVALDAS KALABHAI Vs CHAMPAKLAL CHIMANLAL SODAGAR
-
Read summaryKANUBHAI SANKALCHAND PATEL Vs NAYANKUNJ CO OPERATIVE HOUSING SO.LIMITED
-
Read summary
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.