SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back Icon Back Next Next Icon
AI icon Copy icon AI Message Bookmarks icon Share icon Up Arrow icon Down Arrow icon Zoom in icon Zoom Out icon Print Search icon Print icon Download icon Expand icon Close icon
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Sound Icon
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(AP) 188

P.RAMACHANDRA RAJU
Jagannadha Rao – Appellant
Versus
Y. Subba Rao – Respondent


JAGANNADHA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an assignee-decreeholders appeal preferred under Order 21, rule 103, C. P. C. (as amended) against an order made by the learned 5th Additional judge, City Civil Court, Hyd. in e A No. 60/82 filed under Order 21, Rule 97, C P C. in E P No. 6/80 in 0 S No. 121/70. while allowing E A No. 60/82, the trial Judge considered it. a fit case in which a surveyor should be sent to demarcate S No. 148 and also S Nos. 150/1 and 2 after showing the boundaries by the surveyor of s No. 148 with the aid of the village plan of Shaikpet village, the possession of the schedule mentioned property in s No. 148 is to be given to the decree holders by removing any obstruction in it. I feel in the circumstances the petition is to be allowed, ordering the surveyor to demarcate S No. 150/1 and 2 and also S No. 148 and show the boundaries to the bailiff. "

( 2 ) THE main grievance of the assignee-decree-holders is that though E. A. No. 60/82 was allowed in their favour, the aforesaid directions given by the learned trail Judge have

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top