GODA RAGHURAM, V.V.S.RAO, R.SUBHASH REDDY, RAMESH RANGANATHAN, G.BHAVANI PRASAD
A. P. Civil Liberties Committee – Appellant
Versus
Government of A. P. – Respondent
(Per Goda Raghuram, J.)
Comoetina interoretations of recurrent. contemooraneous events:
Since the inception of the naxalite movement in Andhra Pradesh in 1969, 551 police personnel were killed including one DIG, two S.Ps, five D.S. Ps; 16 Inspectors and 49 Sub-Inspectors. 2928 civilians were killed; public and private property worth hundred of crores of rupees was destroyed; the extremist groups indulged in mindless violence and committed brutal murders. The naxal violence increased since 1991. They deliberately ambush and attack police with sophisticated firearms and explosives. In order to create terror the Maoists are also targeting functionaries of ruling political parties and killing them brutally - (counter affidavit of the Director General of Police in W. P. No. 154191 06 including Annexures 2 and 7)
2. The State Executive for the first time started extra-legal killing which is popularly known as Encounter since 1968 and as on today in the name of alleged encounter the State has snatched away lives of about 4000 people during the last four decades (written submissions dated 4.3.2008 of Mr. V. Raghunath, Advocate for APCLC, in W.P.Nos. 790612000, 14475102 and 440103)
3.
Romesh Chandra Mehta v. State of W.B.: AIR 1970 SC 940. (Para 105)
Dahyabhai Chhaganbhai Thakker v. State of Gujarat: AIR 1964 SC 1563. (Para 146)
Faddi v. State of M.P.: AIR 1964 SC 1850.
Narayanda Bhagwandas Madhavdas v. State of W.B.: AIR 1959 SC 1118. (Para 229)
State of M.P. v. S.B.Johari: (2000) 2 SCC 57.
(1997) 4 SCC 393 = 1997 (2) ALT 9 (DN).
Kishun Singh v. State of Punjab:(1993) 2 SCC 16. (Para 260)
Henry Greer Robinson v. State of South Australia: AIR 1931 PC 254. (Para 282)
The State of U.P. v. Raj Narain and others:(1975) 4 SCC 428. (Para 282)
2006 (2) ALT (Crl.) 106 (SC) = 2006 (3) SCJ 530. (Para 85)
2006 (3) ALT (Crl.) 256 (SC) = 2006 (7) SCJ 867. (Para 85)
2006 (3) ALT (Crl.) 185 (SC) = 2006 (7) SCJ 419. (Para 85)
T.T. Anthony v. State of Kerala and others: (2001) 6 SCC 181 = 2001 (5) ALT 3.5 (ON SC).
Ram Lal Narang v. State (Delhi Administration): (1979) 2 SCC 322. (Para 90)
Upkar Singh v. Ved Prakash:(2004) 13 SCC 292 = 2005 (1) ALT 2.2 (DN SC).(Para 92)
Seriyal Udayar v. State of Tamil Nadu: (1987) 2 SCC 359. (Para 102)
Nandini Satpathy v. P.LDani and anothers: (1978) 2 SCC 424. (Para 105)
Rishikesh Singh v. State: AIR 1970 All 51.
Vadilal Panchalv. Dattatraya Dulaji Ghadigaonkar and another: AIR 1960 SC 1113. (Para 219)
R.R. Chari v. State of UP.: AIR 1951 SC 207.(Para 229)
R. v. Clegg: (1995) 1 A.C. 482. (Para 168)
2006 (2) ALT (Cr!.) 93 (SC) = 2006 (3) SCJ 466. (Para 179)
(2003) 2 SCC 518 = 2003 (3) ALT 14.1 (ON SC).
Francis Coralie Mullin v. Union Territory Delhi
Sunil Batra v. Delhi Admn.: (1978) 4 SCC 494.
Charles Sobhraj v. Supdt., Central Jail
Hussainara Khatoon v. Home Secy.
Madhav Hayawadanrao Hoskot v. State of Maharashtra: (1978) 3 SCC 544. (Para 192)
Tula Ram v. Kishore Singh: (1989) 2 SCC 132.
M/s. India Carat Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Karnataka and another: (1977) 4 SCC 459. (Para 222)
Chief Enforcement Officer v. Videocon International Ltd.: (2008) 2 SCC 492.(Para 228)
Darshan Singh Ram Kishan v. State of Maharashtra: (1971) 2 SCC 654. (Para 229)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.