SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(AP) 885

B.N.RAO NALLA, V.V.S.RAO
D. Tulja Devi – Appellant
Versus
Margam Shankar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Mr. Ch. Ravinder, Petitioners.
Mrs. A. Jayanthi, appointed as AlIlicus Curiae.

ORDER

(Per V.V.S..Rao, J.)

The instant civil revision petition was listed before learned single Judge. The decision in Coli Kota Reddy v. Goli Raja Gopala Reddy (1) 2000 (6) ALT 580 = 2000 (6) ALD 449 = 2000 (3) LS 423 was brought to the notice of the learned Judge, who having opined that a broad proposition cannot be laid down that under no circumstances the civil Court can direct the police to ensure due obedience of decree of perpetual injunction, referred the question to Division Bench. The question referred is whether the decision of the learned single fudge of this Court in Goli Kota Reddy v. Goli Raja Copala Reddy (1 supra) requires reconsideration?.

2. The fact of the matter is as follows. The petitioners (hereafter caned, decree holders/ D. Hrs) are the plaintiffs in O.S.No.1442 of 2001. The said suit was filed for permanent injunction. The Court of II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Warangal decreed the suit on 25.09.2002 restraining the respondent (hereafter called judgment debtor/J.Dr) from invading plaintiffs rights or otherwise interfering with peaceful possession and enjoyment of plaint schedule property. The D.Hrs., filed execution petition which is pending. Some time t























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top