D. RAMESH
T. G. Jaya Chandra Naidu – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
Since the issue involved in both the writ petitions arise out of same cause of action, these two writ petitions disposed of together with a common order.
W.P.No.10799 of 2020:
2. This Writ petition is filed assailing the action of the respondents more particularly the 4th Respondent-Tahsildar, failing to re-enter the name of the Petitioner in the Web-Land Records (Revenue Records) who is the absolute and lawful owner of land admeasuring an extent of Ac. 1.50 cents in Survey No.271/1A, of Tiruchanoor Village, Tirupathi Rural Mandal, Chittoor District notwithstanding the application dated 24.02.2021 made by petitioner and seeking a direction to the 4th respondent to re-enter the name of the petitioner in the revenue records with respect to the said land.
W.P.No.943 of 2020:
3. This writ petition is filed assailing the order of the 4th respondent herein i.e., the Revenue Divisional Officer, vide D.Dis.No.G/867/2018 dated 09.12.2019 in setting aside the order of mutation passed by the 5th respondent-Tahsildar in D.Dis.A/142/2018 and the action of the 2nd respondent in not taking up the appeal and stay petition filed on 27.12.2019 against the orders of the 4th respondent herein dated
Sudershan Reddy and Ors. v. Joint Collector, R.R. District and Others
Erroju Brahmachary Vs. the Revenue Divisional Officer
A. Ranga Bhashyam Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh and Others
Veerabhathini Mallesham and Ors. Vs. The State of A.P. and Others
Thripuravaram Krishna Reddy Vs. Joint Collector, Cuddapah and Others
Veerabhathini Mallesham and Ors. Vs. The State of A.P. and Others
The central legal point established in the judgment is the limitation on the Revenue Divisional Officer's authority to treat an application as an appeal and the requirement for parties to follow the ....
The judgment emphasizes the importance of establishing legal right and title to the lands in question and highlights the significance of pleadings in a writ petition. It also emphasizes the need for ....
The Revenue Divisional Officer lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate applications for land mutation, which must be filed before the Tahsildar according to the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pa....
Point of Law- Section 11 (a) of the Act it is clear that every ryot who claims for grant of ryotwari patta under Section 11 (a) of the Act has to fulfill the following requirements.(i) the land claim....
Land granted under Inams Abolition Act confers ownership, which cannot be revoked without due process; arbitrary state action is unlawful.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.