SUBBA REDDY SATTI
Dungala Yerra Patrudu – Appellant
Versus
Hahs P. Krishna Murthy – Respondent
COMMON ORDER
Subba Reddy Satti, J. - Since the issue involved in both the petitions is one and the same, they are disposed of by this common order.
2. These writ petitions are filed to declare the action of the authority in mutating the names of respondent Nos.6 to 14 in the place of petitioners, in respect of survey Nos.1 to 93, Janakirampuram Agraharam village, Rolugunta Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, and issuing pattadar passbooks and title deeds to respondent Nos.6 to 14 on public holidays on 14.08.2021 and 15.08.2021, after transfer and relieving of respondent No.1 on 14.08.2021, as illegal and arbitrary and consequently cancel pattadar passbook and other record of rights and to declare the petitioners are absolute owners, possessors and enjoyers of the subject land etc.
3. Petitioners 137 in number filed the above writ petitions.
In the affidavit it was contended, inter alia, that petitioners and their legal heirs are permanent residents and farmers of Janakirampuram Agraharam, Rolugnta Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioners are small farmers and have been in possession and enjoyment of bits of agricultural lands. Petitioners' ancestors acquired the land around 400 years ag
Anand Sharadchandra Oka v. University of Mumbai (2008) 5 SCC 217 : AIR 2008 SC 1289
Ayaaubkhan Noorkhan Pathan Vs State of Maharastra
Bharat Singh and others Vs State of Haryana and others
Calcutta Gas Co. (Proprietary) Ltd. v. State of W.B. AIR 1962 SC 1044
Narmada Bachao Andolan Vs State of M.P. and another
Rajendra Singh v. State of M.P. (1996) 5 SCC 460 : AIR 1996 SC 2736
Saghir Ahmad v. State of U.P. AIR 1954 SC 728
Shanti Kumar R. Canji v. Home Insurance Co. of New York (1974) 2 SCC 387 : AIR 1974 SC 1719
State of Orissa v. Madan Gopal Rungta 1951 SCC 1024 : AIR 1952 SC 12
State of Rajasthan v. Union of India (1977) 3 SCC 592 : AIR 1977 SC 1361
Steel Authority of India Ltd. v. National Union Water Front Workers
Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Shareholders Welfare Assn. (2) v. S.C. Sekar (2009) 2 SCC 784
A legal right in property requires proper registration as per the Transfer of Property Act; unregistered documents do not confer ownership.
The Revenue Divisional Officer lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate applications for land mutation, which must be filed before the Tahsildar according to the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pa....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the limitation on the Revenue Divisional Officer's authority to treat an application as an appeal and the requirement for parties to follow the ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.