SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(AP) 1230

CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
Gorla Manasa – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
K R Srinivas, Advocate, Harinath N, Advocate, S V R Subrahmanyam, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Cheekati Manavendranath Roy, J. - This Writ Petition for mandamus is filed to declare the action of the 3rd respondent in not considering the application dated 15.11.2022 of the petitioner to enroll her as an Advocate on the ground of non-production of cancellation of B.Sc. Nursing Certificate of Registration, dated 18.11.2013, issued by the 5th respondent, as illegal and consequently, sought direction to respondent No.3 to consider the application of the petitioner for enrolment as an Advocate.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Maheswara Rao Kuncheam, learned Standing Counsel for 2nd respondent Bar Council of India; Sri S.V.R. Subrahmanyam, learned Standing Counsel for 3rd respondent Bar Council of Andhra Pradesh; and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Medical, Health and Family Welfare, for respondents 4 and 5.

3. At the time of hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Medical, Health and Family Welfare, appearing for respondents 4 and 5, has produced copy of the proceedings issued for cancellation of the Nursing Certificate of Registration issued in favour of the petitioner.

4. Therefore, the hurdle to consider the application of the petitio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top